Appraisal of Agricultural Policy in the Sudan

I. Mohamed, Farah Adil, Dr Ayat Abubakr Mohamed
{"title":"Appraisal of Agricultural Policy in the Sudan","authors":"I. Mohamed, Farah Adil, Dr Ayat Abubakr Mohamed","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3560093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy: is a set of interrelated decision by actor(s) concerning the selection of goals and the means of achieving them within a specified situation where those decisions should, in principle, be within the power of those actors to achieve, as rational and theoretical product that replies to the demands of the powerful majority of the population. Public policies in the Sudan since independence in 1956 are generally a continuation of those adopted in colonial time of high government-led development, land acquisition, production controls and emphasis on irrigated agriculture. Land and crop taxes, especially indirect ones, formed the bulk of government budget revenue at that time. Agriculture is a cutting-edge sector of the economy that is both prosperous and innovative, yet the government has continued to ignore free-market principles by preserving an endless array of macroeconomic policies, credit and financing policy that centrally plan agriculture by controlling supply and thereby raising prices for consumers and increases the cost of production for producers. In general there are not a well-documented agricultural policies, but depending on the general economic policies that dictates the agricultural policies.","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"57 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3560093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy: is a set of interrelated decision by actor(s) concerning the selection of goals and the means of achieving them within a specified situation where those decisions should, in principle, be within the power of those actors to achieve, as rational and theoretical product that replies to the demands of the powerful majority of the population. Public policies in the Sudan since independence in 1956 are generally a continuation of those adopted in colonial time of high government-led development, land acquisition, production controls and emphasis on irrigated agriculture. Land and crop taxes, especially indirect ones, formed the bulk of government budget revenue at that time. Agriculture is a cutting-edge sector of the economy that is both prosperous and innovative, yet the government has continued to ignore free-market principles by preserving an endless array of macroeconomic policies, credit and financing policy that centrally plan agriculture by controlling supply and thereby raising prices for consumers and increases the cost of production for producers. In general there are not a well-documented agricultural policies, but depending on the general economic policies that dictates the agricultural policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏丹农业政策评价
政策:是行为者关于在特定情况下选择目标和实现这些目标的手段的一系列相互关联的决定,这些决定原则上应该在这些行为者的权力范围内实现,作为回应人口中强大的大多数人的要求的理性和理论产品。自1956年独立以来,苏丹的公共政策总体上延续了殖民时期政府主导的发展、土地征用、生产控制和强调灌溉农业的政策。土地和农作物税,特别是间接税,构成了当时政府预算收入的主要部分。农业是经济的一个前沿部门,既繁荣又创新,但政府继续忽视自由市场原则,保留了一系列无休止的宏观经济政策、信贷和融资政策,通过控制供应来集中计划农业,从而提高了消费者的价格,增加了生产者的生产成本。一般来说,没有一个完善的农业政策,但取决于一般的经济政策,决定了农业政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and State-Building in the World’s Most Agricultural Countries The heterogeneous effects of agricultural conservation easements on the loss of farmland to development in New England Displacement Risk in Agricultural Commodity Markets: The Impact of Plant-Based Meat Interest Group Responses to Reform Efforts in the U.S. House of Representatives: The Case of Big Sugar Fishing under the Radar: Illuminating the Compliance Gap of Fishing Bans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1