Assessment of Losses in Harvesting and Threshing by Manual Method for Wheat and Maize Crop in Samastipur District, Bihar, India

D. Rajak, G. Immanuel, R. Jat
{"title":"Assessment of Losses in Harvesting and Threshing by Manual Method for Wheat and Maize Crop in Samastipur District, Bihar, India","authors":"D. Rajak, G. Immanuel, R. Jat","doi":"10.23910/2/2022.ijep0482b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted at Borlaug Institute of South Asia (BISA) Pusa, Bihar to assess the losses in harvesting and threshing by manual methods for wheat and maize. 5 farmers from 15 identified villages were selected from Samastipur district of Bihar for assessing harvesting and threshing losses of wheat and maize crop. A total of 75 farmers were selected for this study from Kabargama Phulhara, Ajana, Gopalpur, Maniarpur, Rampura, Ladaura, Birsingpur, Kalyanpur, Akbarpur, Pratapur, Basudevpur, Dhruvgama, Tera, Mirjapur, Samastipur. A pre-procedure for loss assessment was used to record the details of the harvesting and threshing loss practices. It was observed that the total harvesting loss in all 15 villages were 1.65% and threshing loss 2.30% and maize 1.20%, respectively. Wheat Threshing Loss was found highest at 3.35% in Mirjapur village and the lowest at 1.18% in Rampura. Maize threshing loss was found to be highest in Pratapur village by 1.66% and lowest at 0.85% in Ladaura. The threshing loss was found less in Maize as compared to the harvesting and threshing loss of wheat and Maize due to the low loss, it is because of the long-stalked cubs of corn, in which there is no settling loss. The increase in losses was probably due to delays in harvesting due to unseasonal rains and storms, when the crop was ready for harvesting in some cases and less use of technologies at the agricultural level. There is a need for training farmers while harvesting and threshing of wheat and maize to reduce the loss of grain.","PeriodicalId":13829,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economic Plants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economic Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23910/2/2022.ijep0482b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was conducted at Borlaug Institute of South Asia (BISA) Pusa, Bihar to assess the losses in harvesting and threshing by manual methods for wheat and maize. 5 farmers from 15 identified villages were selected from Samastipur district of Bihar for assessing harvesting and threshing losses of wheat and maize crop. A total of 75 farmers were selected for this study from Kabargama Phulhara, Ajana, Gopalpur, Maniarpur, Rampura, Ladaura, Birsingpur, Kalyanpur, Akbarpur, Pratapur, Basudevpur, Dhruvgama, Tera, Mirjapur, Samastipur. A pre-procedure for loss assessment was used to record the details of the harvesting and threshing loss practices. It was observed that the total harvesting loss in all 15 villages were 1.65% and threshing loss 2.30% and maize 1.20%, respectively. Wheat Threshing Loss was found highest at 3.35% in Mirjapur village and the lowest at 1.18% in Rampura. Maize threshing loss was found to be highest in Pratapur village by 1.66% and lowest at 0.85% in Ladaura. The threshing loss was found less in Maize as compared to the harvesting and threshing loss of wheat and Maize due to the low loss, it is because of the long-stalked cubs of corn, in which there is no settling loss. The increase in losses was probably due to delays in harvesting due to unseasonal rains and storms, when the crop was ready for harvesting in some cases and less use of technologies at the agricultural level. There is a need for training farmers while harvesting and threshing of wheat and maize to reduce the loss of grain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度比哈尔邦Samastipur地区小麦和玉米作物人工收割和脱粒损失评估
这项研究是在比哈尔邦普萨的博洛格南亚研究所(BISA)进行的,目的是评估小麦和玉米人工收割和脱粒的损失。从比哈尔邦Samastipur区15个确定村庄中选出5名农民,评估小麦和玉米作物的收获和脱粒损失。共有75名农民被选中参加这项研究,他们来自Kabargama Phulhara、Ajana、Gopalpur、Maniarpur、Rampura、Ladaura、Birsingpur、Kalyanpur、Akbarpur、Pratapur、Basudevpur、Dhruvgama、Tera、Mirjapur、Samastipur。损失评估预程序用于记录收获和脱粒损失做法的细节。结果表明,15个村的收获损失为1.65%,脱粒损失为2.30%,玉米损失为1.20%。Mirjapur村小麦脱粒损失率最高,为3.35%,Rampura村最低,为1.18%。Pratapur村玉米脱粒损失最高,为1.66%,Ladaura村最低,为0.85%。玉米的脱粒损失比小麦和玉米的收获和脱粒损失要小,因为玉米的脱粒损失小,这是因为玉米的幼崽长茎,没有沉淀损失。损失的增加可能是由于非季节性降雨和风暴造成的收获延迟,而在某些情况下,作物已经准备好收割了,而且在农业一级使用的技术较少。有必要在小麦和玉米收割和脱粒时对农民进行培训,以减少粮食损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Paddy Profitability Trends: A Comparative Analysis Across Five Major Growing States of India Residue Retention and Potassium Nitrate Improvise the Yield and Economics of Wheat Crop Biology of Plassey Borer, Chilo tumidicostalis (Hampson) (Crambidae: Lepidoptera) Effect of Nano-urea on Growth, Productivity and Economics of Transplanted Rice Performance of Guava Stem Cutting – A Review of Successful Though Non-commercial Propagation Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1