Function Testing for Chemical Brain Damage: A Review

K. Kilburn
{"title":"Function Testing for Chemical Brain Damage: A Review","authors":"K. Kilburn","doi":"10.1080/00039890109604064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Testing of neurobehavioral functions for evaluation of the effects of chemicals on the human brain from community (i.e., environmental) exposures is logical and may be a preferred initial step. Sensitivity is improved (1) by adjusting individual tests for influential factors, found by regression modeling and by retaining significant coefficients; and (2) by the calculation of predicted values for each test for each subject. This two-part approach allows for adjustments in age, sex, educational level, and other factors before comparisons are made. Visual fields, color discrimination, reaction time, balance, and digit symbol are the most sensitive tests, followed by 6 sensitive psychological tests and less-discriminating physiological measurements. Hydrogen sulfide, polychlorinated biphenyls, and arsenic are the most toxic chemicals, followed by chlorine, chlorpyrifos, formaldehyde, nickel carbonyl, and ammonia. The least toxic chemicals, which are hydrochloric acid and chlorine, were determined 7 wk following a community spill. The least toxic chemical among those identified herein is methyl ter butyl ether.","PeriodicalId":8276,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"132 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00039890109604064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract Testing of neurobehavioral functions for evaluation of the effects of chemicals on the human brain from community (i.e., environmental) exposures is logical and may be a preferred initial step. Sensitivity is improved (1) by adjusting individual tests for influential factors, found by regression modeling and by retaining significant coefficients; and (2) by the calculation of predicted values for each test for each subject. This two-part approach allows for adjustments in age, sex, educational level, and other factors before comparisons are made. Visual fields, color discrimination, reaction time, balance, and digit symbol are the most sensitive tests, followed by 6 sensitive psychological tests and less-discriminating physiological measurements. Hydrogen sulfide, polychlorinated biphenyls, and arsenic are the most toxic chemicals, followed by chlorine, chlorpyrifos, formaldehyde, nickel carbonyl, and ammonia. The least toxic chemicals, which are hydrochloric acid and chlorine, were determined 7 wk following a community spill. The least toxic chemical among those identified herein is methyl ter butyl ether.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化学脑损伤的功能检测研究进展
通过测试神经行为功能来评估来自社区(即环境)暴露的化学物质对人类大脑的影响是合乎逻辑的,并且可能是首选的初始步骤。通过调整回归建模发现的影响因素的个体测试并保留显著系数,提高了灵敏度(1);(2)通过计算每个被试每次测试的预测值。这种分为两部分的方法允许在进行比较之前对年龄、性别、教育水平和其他因素进行调整。视野、辨色、反应时间、平衡和数字符号是最敏感的测试,其次是6项敏感的心理测试和不太敏感的生理测试。硫化氢、多氯联苯和砷是毒性最大的化学物质,其次是氯、毒死蜱、甲醛、羰基镍和氨。毒性最小的化学物质是盐酸和氯,是在社区泄漏7周后确定的。在这些鉴定中毒性最小的化学物质是甲基叔丁基醚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index to Volume 59 Mold Conference Objectives and Summary Diisocyanates and Nonoccupational Disease: A Review Index to volume 57 The Archives—a New Beginning Every Month
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1