Self-forming Dynamic Membranes for Wastewater Treatment

J. Millanar-Marfa, L. Borea, F. Castrogiovanni, S. Hasan, K. Choo, G. Korshin, M. D. Luna, F. Ballesteros, V. Belgiorno, Vincenzo Naddeo
{"title":"Self-forming Dynamic Membranes for Wastewater Treatment","authors":"J. Millanar-Marfa, L. Borea, F. Castrogiovanni, S. Hasan, K. Choo, G. Korshin, M. D. Luna, F. Ballesteros, V. Belgiorno, Vincenzo Naddeo","doi":"10.1080/15422119.2021.1887223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Self-forming dynamic membrane (SFDM) technology has been gaining significant interest due to its potential advantages, notably lower capital and operational cost and easier fouling control, over conventional membranes used in membrane bioreactors. SFDM technology utilizes inexpensive support material integrated with a dynamic membrane (DM) made of suspended solids and biomass to provide high effluent quality. Objectives This paper aims to bridge the gap between the previous reviews and the current studies to provide a comprehensive review on SFDM applications to both aerobic and anaerobic bioreactors. Literature review The historical development of DMs since the 1960s up to the present is presented. Specific attention was given to DM formation mechanisms, deposition time, impacts of design, and operational factors (mesh characteristics and sludge properties) on DM formation and performances and on DM-based integrated systems. Abbreviations AnDMBR, anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor; CFV,crossflow velocity; COD,chemical oxygen demand; DM,dynamic membrane; DO,dissolved oxygen; EPS,extracellular polymeric substances; F/M,food to microorganisms ratio; HRT,hydraulic retention time; J,flux; MBR,membrane bioreactor; MF,microfiltration; MLSS,mixed liquor suspended solids; PSD,particle size distribution; RO,reverse osmosis; SEM,scanning electron microscopy; SFDM,self-forming dynamic membrane; SMP,soluble microbial products; SRT,sludge retention time; SS,suspended solids; TMP,transmembrane pressure; TN,total nitrogen; TP,total phosphorus; TSS,total suspended solids; UF,ultrafiltration","PeriodicalId":21744,"journal":{"name":"Separation & Purification Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation & Purification Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2021.1887223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Self-forming dynamic membrane (SFDM) technology has been gaining significant interest due to its potential advantages, notably lower capital and operational cost and easier fouling control, over conventional membranes used in membrane bioreactors. SFDM technology utilizes inexpensive support material integrated with a dynamic membrane (DM) made of suspended solids and biomass to provide high effluent quality. Objectives This paper aims to bridge the gap between the previous reviews and the current studies to provide a comprehensive review on SFDM applications to both aerobic and anaerobic bioreactors. Literature review The historical development of DMs since the 1960s up to the present is presented. Specific attention was given to DM formation mechanisms, deposition time, impacts of design, and operational factors (mesh characteristics and sludge properties) on DM formation and performances and on DM-based integrated systems. Abbreviations AnDMBR, anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor; CFV,crossflow velocity; COD,chemical oxygen demand; DM,dynamic membrane; DO,dissolved oxygen; EPS,extracellular polymeric substances; F/M,food to microorganisms ratio; HRT,hydraulic retention time; J,flux; MBR,membrane bioreactor; MF,microfiltration; MLSS,mixed liquor suspended solids; PSD,particle size distribution; RO,reverse osmosis; SEM,scanning electron microscopy; SFDM,self-forming dynamic membrane; SMP,soluble microbial products; SRT,sludge retention time; SS,suspended solids; TMP,transmembrane pressure; TN,total nitrogen; TP,total phosphorus; TSS,total suspended solids; UF,ultrafiltration
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于废水处理的自形成动态膜
自形成动态膜(SFDM)技术由于其潜在的优势,特别是比膜生物反应器中使用的传统膜更低的资本和操作成本以及更容易的污染控制,已经获得了极大的兴趣。SFDM技术利用廉价的支撑材料与由悬浮固体和生物质制成的动态膜(DM)相结合,提供高质量的废水。本文旨在弥合以往研究和目前研究的差距,全面综述SFDM在好氧和厌氧生物反应器中的应用。文献综述介绍了自20世纪60年代至今的dm的历史发展。特别关注了DM的形成机制、沉积时间、设计和操作因素(网格特性和污泥特性)对DM形成和性能以及基于DM的集成系统的影响。AnDMBR,厌氧动态膜生物反应器;CFV横向气流速度;COD,化学需氧量;DM、动态膜;做,溶解氧;EPS,胞外聚合物质;F/M:食物与微生物比;HRT:液压停留时间;J,通量;MBR膜生物反应器;MF,微量过滤;MLSS,混合液悬浮物;PSD:粒度分布;RO反渗透;扫描电子显微镜;SFDM,自成型动态膜;SMP:可溶性微生物产物;SRT:污泥滞留时间;党卫军,悬浮物;TMP,跨膜压力;TN、总氮;TP,总磷;TSS:总悬浮固体;超滤,超滤
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Latest Development of Matrix Solid Phase Dispersion Extraction and Microextraction for Natural Products from 2015-2021 Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Hydrometallurgical Methods Separation of Plutonium from Other Actinides and Fission Products in Ionic Liquid Medium Fixed Bed Adsorption of Water Contaminants: A Cautionary Guide to Simple Analytical Models and Modeling Misconceptions Application of Aqueous Biphasic Systems Extraction in Various Biomolecules Separation and Purification: Advancements Brought by Quaternary Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1