Forecasting Financial Crashes: A Dynamic Risk Management Approach

J-C Gerlach, Dongshuai Zhao, CFA, D. Sornette
{"title":"Forecasting Financial Crashes: A Dynamic Risk Management Approach","authors":"J-C Gerlach, Dongshuai Zhao, CFA, D. Sornette","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3744816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2009, stock markets have resided in a long bull market regime. Passive investment strategies \nhave succeeded during this low-volatility growth period. From 2018 on, however, there was a transition into a more volatile market environment interspersed by corrections increasing in amplitude and frequency. This calls for more adaptive dynamic risk management strategies, as opposed to static buy-and-hold strategies. To hedge against market drawdowns, the greatest source of risk that should accurately be estimated is crash risk. \n \nThis article applies the Log-Periodic Power Law Singularity (LPPLS) model of endogenous asset price bubbles to monitor crash risk. The model is calibrated to 15 years market history for five relevant equity country indices. Particular emphasis is put on the US S&P 500 Composite Index and the recent market history of the \"Corona\" year 2020. The results show that relevant historical bubble events, including the Corona crash, could be detected with the model and derived indicators. Many of these events were predicted in advance in monthly reports by the Financial Crisis Observatory (FCO) at ETH Zurich. The Corona crash, as the most recent event of interest, is discussed in further detail. Our conclusion is that unsustainable price dynamics leading to an unstable bubble, fuelled by quantitative easing and other policies, already existed well before the pandemic started. Thus, the bubble bursting in February 2020 as a reaction to the Corona pandemic was of endogenous nature and burst in response to the exogenous Corona crisis, which was predictable to some degree based on the endogenous price dynamics. Following the crash, a fast recovery of the price to pre-crisis levels ensued in the following months. This lets us conclude that, as long as the underlying origins and the macroeconomic environment that created this bubble do not change, the bubble will continue to grow and potentially spread to other sectors. This may cause even more hectic market behaviour, overreaction and volatile corrections in the future.","PeriodicalId":11800,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2009, stock markets have resided in a long bull market regime. Passive investment strategies have succeeded during this low-volatility growth period. From 2018 on, however, there was a transition into a more volatile market environment interspersed by corrections increasing in amplitude and frequency. This calls for more adaptive dynamic risk management strategies, as opposed to static buy-and-hold strategies. To hedge against market drawdowns, the greatest source of risk that should accurately be estimated is crash risk. This article applies the Log-Periodic Power Law Singularity (LPPLS) model of endogenous asset price bubbles to monitor crash risk. The model is calibrated to 15 years market history for five relevant equity country indices. Particular emphasis is put on the US S&P 500 Composite Index and the recent market history of the "Corona" year 2020. The results show that relevant historical bubble events, including the Corona crash, could be detected with the model and derived indicators. Many of these events were predicted in advance in monthly reports by the Financial Crisis Observatory (FCO) at ETH Zurich. The Corona crash, as the most recent event of interest, is discussed in further detail. Our conclusion is that unsustainable price dynamics leading to an unstable bubble, fuelled by quantitative easing and other policies, already existed well before the pandemic started. Thus, the bubble bursting in February 2020 as a reaction to the Corona pandemic was of endogenous nature and burst in response to the exogenous Corona crisis, which was predictable to some degree based on the endogenous price dynamics. Following the crash, a fast recovery of the price to pre-crisis levels ensued in the following months. This lets us conclude that, as long as the underlying origins and the macroeconomic environment that created this bubble do not change, the bubble will continue to grow and potentially spread to other sectors. This may cause even more hectic market behaviour, overreaction and volatile corrections in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测金融危机:动态风险管理方法
自2009年以来,股市一直处于长期牛市状态。被动投资策略在这一低波动性增长时期取得了成功。然而,从2018年开始,市场进入了一个更加动荡的市场环境,其间穿插着幅度和频率增加的修正。这需要更具适应性的动态风险管理策略,而不是静态的买入并持有策略。为了对冲市场下跌,应该准确估计的最大风险来源是崩盘风险。本文应用内生资产价格泡沫的对数周期幂律奇点(LPPLS)模型来监测崩盘风险。该模型是根据5个相关国家股票指数的15年市场历史进行校准的。特别强调的是美国标准普尔500综合指数和“Corona”2020年的近期市场历史。结果表明,该模型和衍生指标可以检测到相关的历史泡沫事件,包括Corona崩溃。苏黎世联邦理工学院的金融危机观察站(FCO)在月度报告中提前预测了其中的许多事件。作为最近有趣的事件,我们将进一步详细讨论Corona的崩溃。我们的结论是,在量化宽松和其他政策的推动下,导致不稳定泡沫的不可持续的价格动态在大流行开始之前就已经存在。因此,作为对冠状病毒大流行的反应,2020年2月的泡沫破裂具有内生性质,是对外源性冠状病毒危机的反应,而外源性危机在一定程度上是可以根据内生价格动态预测的。在崩盘之后的几个月里,金价迅速回升至危机前的水平。这让我们得出结论,只要产生泡沫的根本根源和宏观经济环境没有改变,泡沫就会继续增长,并有可能蔓延到其他领域。这可能会导致未来市场行为更加混乱、反应过度和波动性调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Risk-Return Tradeoff Among Equity Factors Predictive Regressions under Arbitrary Persistence and Stock Return Predictability News and Trading After Hours High-Frequency Arbitrage and Market Illiquidity President’s Confidence and the Stock Market Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1