Helping older pedestrians navigate in the city: comparisons of visual, auditory and haptic guidance instructions in a virtual environment

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Behaviour & Information Technology Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1519035
Angélique Montuwy, Aurélie Dommes, B. Cahour
{"title":"Helping older pedestrians navigate in the city: comparisons of visual, auditory and haptic guidance instructions in a virtual environment","authors":"Angélique Montuwy, Aurélie Dommes, B. Cahour","doi":"10.1080/0144929X.2018.1519035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Preserving older pedestrians’ navigation skills in urban environments is a challenge for maintaining their quality of life. However, existing aids do not take into account older people’s perceptual and cognitive declines nor their user experience, and they call upon sensory modalities that are already used during walking. The present study was aimed at comparing different guidance instructions using visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in order to identify the most efficient and best accepted one(s). Sixteen middle-age (non-retired) adults, 21 younger-old (young-retired) adults, and 21 older-old (old-retired) adults performed a navigation task in a virtual environment. The task was performed with visual feedback (directional arrows superimposed on the visual scenes), auditory feedback (sounds in the left/right ear), haptic feedback (vibrotactile information delivered by a wristband), combinations of different types of sensory feedback, or a paper map. The results showed that older people benefited from the sensory guidance instructions, as compared to the paper map. Visual and auditory feedbacks were associated with better performance and user experience than haptic feedback or the paper map, and the benefits were the greatest among the older-old participants, even though the paper-map familiarity was appreciated. Several recommendations for designing pedestrian navigation aids are proposed.","PeriodicalId":55392,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour & Information Technology","volume":"43 1","pages":"150 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour & Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1519035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT Preserving older pedestrians’ navigation skills in urban environments is a challenge for maintaining their quality of life. However, existing aids do not take into account older people’s perceptual and cognitive declines nor their user experience, and they call upon sensory modalities that are already used during walking. The present study was aimed at comparing different guidance instructions using visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in order to identify the most efficient and best accepted one(s). Sixteen middle-age (non-retired) adults, 21 younger-old (young-retired) adults, and 21 older-old (old-retired) adults performed a navigation task in a virtual environment. The task was performed with visual feedback (directional arrows superimposed on the visual scenes), auditory feedback (sounds in the left/right ear), haptic feedback (vibrotactile information delivered by a wristband), combinations of different types of sensory feedback, or a paper map. The results showed that older people benefited from the sensory guidance instructions, as compared to the paper map. Visual and auditory feedbacks were associated with better performance and user experience than haptic feedback or the paper map, and the benefits were the greatest among the older-old participants, even though the paper-map familiarity was appreciated. Several recommendations for designing pedestrian navigation aids are proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帮助老年行人在城市中导航:虚拟环境中视觉、听觉和触觉引导指令的比较
在城市环境中保护老年行人的导航能力是维持他们生活质量的一个挑战。然而,现有的辅助设备没有考虑到老年人的知觉和认知能力下降,也没有考虑到他们的使用体验,它们需要在行走时已经使用的感觉模式。本研究的目的是比较不同的指导指令使用视觉,听觉和触觉反馈,以确定最有效和最容易接受的一个(s)。16名中年(未退休)成年人、21名年轻(年轻退休)成年人和21名年长(年老退休)成年人在虚拟环境中执行导航任务。这项任务是通过视觉反馈(叠加在视觉场景上的方向箭头)、听觉反馈(左/右耳的声音)、触觉反馈(由腕带传递的振动触觉信息)、不同类型感官反馈的组合或纸质地图来完成的。结果表明,与纸质地图相比,老年人从感官引导指令中受益。与触觉反馈或纸质地图相比,视觉和听觉反馈与更好的表现和用户体验有关,而且在年龄较大的参与者中,好处最大,尽管熟悉纸质地图的人受到赞赏。对行人导航设备的设计提出了几点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour & Information Technology
Behaviour & Information Technology 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Behaviour & Information Technology (BIT) puts people before technology. As such it deviates from other related journals. It is the primary scientific venue for peer-reviewed publications on human-centred IT. BIT reports original research studies, practical case studies, and thoughtful articles on: • usability and user experience (UX) • human computer interaction (HCI) • human-centred and user-centred design • the social, business and human aspects of the digital world. The Journal attracts authors and readers from a variety of disciplines (e.g., usability, user experience, psychology, ergonomics, computer science, and sociology), originating from both academics and industry. All papers are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, will undertake rigorous double blind peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the effects of knowledge-sharing dynamics on crowdsourcing contest participation. The feasibility of passively tracking children's TV viewing and mobile device use in naturalistic settings. User-centred design and evaluation of an mHealth app for fathers' perinatal mental health: a feasibility, acceptability, and usability study. Cognitive evaluation based on regression and eye-tracking for layout on human–computer multi-interface The promise and challenges of generative AI in education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1