The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Care of Treatment-Naïve Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Receiving Intravitreal Aflibercept.

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Journal of Geophysical Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1055/a-1830-0505
Reinhard Angermann, Alexander Franchi, Katharina Frede, Julia Rettenwander, Tanja Rettenwander, Julia Neyer, Martin Stattin, Martina Kralinger, Claus Zehetner
{"title":"The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Care of Treatment-Naïve Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Receiving Intravitreal Aflibercept.","authors":"Reinhard Angermann, Alexander Franchi, Katharina Frede, Julia Rettenwander, Tanja Rettenwander, Julia Neyer, Martin Stattin, Martina Kralinger, Claus Zehetner","doi":"10.1055/a-1830-0505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the quality of care received by treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who received intravitreal aflibercept therapy before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with patients who received the same therapy during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and anatomical outcomes at diagnosis and at each follow-up, was collected on 297 treatment-naïve patients who received intravitreal aflibercept. Therapy-naïve patients who started therapy at least 24 months prior to the first pandemic-related lockdown and were thus treated exclusively prior to the pandemic (n = 123) were compared with patients who started therapy within 12 months prior to the first lockdown and were thus treated during the pandemic (n = 174). Both groups were followed over a two-year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients treated before the COVID-19 pandemic, VA remained stable (0.58 ± 0.41 logMAR) compared to baseline (0.54 ± 0.34 logMAR; p = 0.228) until the end of the observation period. In patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic, BCVA dropped below the baseline (0.56 ± 0.35 logMAR) within 24-month of follow-up (0.79 ± 0.43 logMAR; p = 0.010). Compared to the patients treated prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the latter group showed a significantly worse VA at the 6-month (p = 0.041), 12-month (p = 0.040), 18-month (p = 0.024), 21-month (p = 0.035), and 24-month (p = 0.004) follow-up. Additionally, the group treated during the COVID-19 pandemic received significantly fewer aflibercept injections (3,94 ± 1,9 vs. 3,30 ± 1,6; p = 0,007) and fewer follow-up examinations (2,71 ± 1,2 vs. 2,16 ± 0,9; p < 0,001) in the second year compared to the group that was treated before the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We confirmed significantly worse VA outcomes in the group of nAMD patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Impeded access to care could be attributed to the restrictions imposed owing to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":15836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research","volume":"107 1","pages":"1246-1254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1830-0505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of care received by treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who received intravitreal aflibercept therapy before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with patients who received the same therapy during the pandemic.

Methods: Data, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and anatomical outcomes at diagnosis and at each follow-up, was collected on 297 treatment-naïve patients who received intravitreal aflibercept. Therapy-naïve patients who started therapy at least 24 months prior to the first pandemic-related lockdown and were thus treated exclusively prior to the pandemic (n = 123) were compared with patients who started therapy within 12 months prior to the first lockdown and were thus treated during the pandemic (n = 174). Both groups were followed over a two-year period.

Results: In patients treated before the COVID-19 pandemic, VA remained stable (0.58 ± 0.41 logMAR) compared to baseline (0.54 ± 0.34 logMAR; p = 0.228) until the end of the observation period. In patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic, BCVA dropped below the baseline (0.56 ± 0.35 logMAR) within 24-month of follow-up (0.79 ± 0.43 logMAR; p = 0.010). Compared to the patients treated prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the latter group showed a significantly worse VA at the 6-month (p = 0.041), 12-month (p = 0.040), 18-month (p = 0.024), 21-month (p = 0.035), and 24-month (p = 0.004) follow-up. Additionally, the group treated during the COVID-19 pandemic received significantly fewer aflibercept injections (3,94 ± 1,9 vs. 3,30 ± 1,6; p = 0,007) and fewer follow-up examinations (2,71 ± 1,2 vs. 2,16 ± 0,9; p < 0,001) in the second year compared to the group that was treated before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion: We confirmed significantly worse VA outcomes in the group of nAMD patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Impeded access to care could be attributed to the restrictions imposed owing to the COVID-19 pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行对Treatment-Naïve新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者玻璃体内注射阿非利赛普的护理质量的影响
目的:本研究的目的是比较treatment-naïve新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)患者在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行前接受玻璃体腔内治疗与在大流行期间接受相同治疗的患者所接受的护理质量。方法:收集297例(treatment-naïve)玻璃体内注射阿夫利塞普的患者在诊断和每次随访时的解剖学结果,包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)作为最小分辨角(logMAR)的对数。Therapy-naïve将在第一次与大流行相关的封锁之前至少24个月开始治疗并因此在大流行之前完全接受治疗的患者(n = 123)与在第一次封锁之前12个月内开始治疗并因此在大流行期间接受治疗的患者(n = 174)进行比较。两组人都接受了为期两年的随访。结果:在COVID-19大流行前接受治疗的患者中,与基线(0.54±0.34 logMAR)相比,VA保持稳定(0.58±0.41 logMAR);P = 0.228),直至观察期结束。在COVID-19大流行期间接受治疗的患者中,BCVA在随访24个月内降至基线(0.56±0.35 logMAR)以下(0.79±0.43 logMAR;p = 0.010)。与COVID-19大流行前治疗的患者相比,后者在随访6个月(p = 0.041)、12个月(p = 0.040)、18个月(p = 0.024)、21个月(p = 0.035)和24个月(p = 0.004)时的VA明显更差。此外,在COVID-19大流行期间治疗的组接受阿非利西普注射的次数明显减少(3,94±1,9比3,30±1,6;P = 0,007)和较少的随访检查(2,71±1,2 vs. 2,16±0,9;结论:我们证实,在COVID-19大流行期间接受治疗的nAMD患者组的VA结果明显更差。获得医疗服务受到阻碍可归因于因COVID-19大流行而实施的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research
Journal of Geophysical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) publishes original scientific research on the physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the understanding of the Earth, Sun, and solar system and all of their environments and components. JGR is currently organized into seven disciplinary sections (Atmospheres, Biogeosciences, Earth Surface, Oceans, Planets, Solid Earth, Space Physics). Sections may be added or combined in response to changes in the science.
期刊最新文献
The Human Mitochondrial Genome Encodes for an Interferon-Responsive Host Defense Peptide. Comparative study on the bioavailability of peptide extracts from Jeju black pigs and three-way crossbred pigs. Comparative Efficacy of Epley, Semont and Gans Maneuver in Treating Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. Evaluation of Medial Retrotympanum by High-Resolution Computed Tomography and Endoscopy - A Descriptive Study. Heparin Binding Protein in Early Differential Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1