The Open Access Observatory

Q2 Social Sciences LIBER Quarterly Pub Date : 2019-10-15 DOI:10.18352/lq.10295
Anna Rovira, I. Labastida
{"title":"The Open Access Observatory","authors":"Anna Rovira, I. Labastida","doi":"10.18352/lq.10295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open Access seems to have reached a flipping point and become a real option when researchers decide where to publish. However the figures provided when someone gives percentages are not clear because there is a lack of coincidence when defining open access. In this paper we would like to explain the project initiated by two Catalan universities, the Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and the Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC), which decided to use a common methodology to measure the different levels of open access in their institution. A methodology that can be used by any institution around the world to make visible their evolution and trends in the Open Access movement. Moreover, we also share a methodology to estimate the expenditure on fees to publish open access. In these two research institutions there is not a central system for processing those payments and therefore we need to make estimations in order to know how much we pay each year. Again, we think this methodology can be used worldwide. Both initiatives configure the initial work of what we called the Open Access Observatory, a project that was created aimed at providing and sharing evidences, methodologies and data in relation to open access publications.","PeriodicalId":39179,"journal":{"name":"LIBER Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBER Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Open Access seems to have reached a flipping point and become a real option when researchers decide where to publish. However the figures provided when someone gives percentages are not clear because there is a lack of coincidence when defining open access. In this paper we would like to explain the project initiated by two Catalan universities, the Universitat de Barcelona (UB) and the Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC), which decided to use a common methodology to measure the different levels of open access in their institution. A methodology that can be used by any institution around the world to make visible their evolution and trends in the Open Access movement. Moreover, we also share a methodology to estimate the expenditure on fees to publish open access. In these two research institutions there is not a central system for processing those payments and therefore we need to make estimations in order to know how much we pay each year. Again, we think this methodology can be used worldwide. Both initiatives configure the initial work of what we called the Open Access Observatory, a project that was created aimed at providing and sharing evidences, methodologies and data in relation to open access publications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放获取天文台
开放获取似乎已经达到了一个转折点,当研究人员决定在哪里发表论文时,它成为了一个真正的选择。然而,当有人给出百分比时提供的数字并不清楚,因为在定义开放获取时缺乏一致性。在本文中,我们想解释由两所加泰罗尼亚大学,巴塞罗那大学(UB)和加泰罗尼亚理工大学(UPC)发起的项目,这两所大学决定使用一种共同的方法来衡量其机构的不同开放获取水平。这是一种可以被世界上任何机构使用的方法,可以让人们看到他们在开放获取运动中的演变和趋势。此外,我们还分享了一种估算开放获取出版费用支出的方法。在这两个研究机构中,没有一个处理这些付款的中央系统,因此我们需要作出估计,以便知道我们每年支付多少钱。同样,我们认为这种方法可以在世界范围内使用。这两项倡议都为我们所谓的开放获取观察站(Open Access Observatory)奠定了基础,这是一个旨在提供和共享与开放获取出版物相关的证据、方法和数据的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LIBER Quarterly
LIBER Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nitpicking online knowledge representations of governmental leadership. The case of Belgian prime ministers in Wikipedia and Wikidata. Applied and conceptual approaches to evidence-based practice in research and academic libraries Revealing Reviewers’ Identities as Part of Open Peer Review and Analysis of the Review Reports Lessons From the Open Library of Humanities Patterns for searching data on the web across different research communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1