Sedation-free upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and its cost-effectiveness

Kubilay Oztutuncu
{"title":"Sedation-free upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and its cost-effectiveness","authors":"Kubilay Oztutuncu","doi":"10.5455/medscience.2023.06.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the success rate of sedation-free upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this drug-free approach.The study included patients who underwent gastroscopy between February 2020 and December 2022. Demographic information such as age and gender, along with clinical data including whether the procedure was performed with sedation and the patients' tolerance status, were recorded. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the sedation and sedation-free groups in terms of procedural success. Interestingly, a notable cost difference of 43% was observed between the two groups, with the sedation-free group demonstrating higher cost-effectiveness. Despite the nearly 50% higher cost associated with administering sedation, there was no significant disparity in the successful completion of the procedure between the two groups. The findings of this study indicate that sedation-free upper GI endoscopy can achieve comparable success rates to the sedation-assisted approach. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness analysis highlights the economic advantage of the drug-free alternative, given the substantial cost reduction observed in the sedation-free group. This study underscores the feasibility of implementing sedation-free procedures as a cost-effective and successful option for upper GI endoscopy","PeriodicalId":18541,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2023.06.090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the success rate of sedation-free upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this drug-free approach.The study included patients who underwent gastroscopy between February 2020 and December 2022. Demographic information such as age and gender, along with clinical data including whether the procedure was performed with sedation and the patients' tolerance status, were recorded. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the sedation and sedation-free groups in terms of procedural success. Interestingly, a notable cost difference of 43% was observed between the two groups, with the sedation-free group demonstrating higher cost-effectiveness. Despite the nearly 50% higher cost associated with administering sedation, there was no significant disparity in the successful completion of the procedure between the two groups. The findings of this study indicate that sedation-free upper GI endoscopy can achieve comparable success rates to the sedation-assisted approach. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness analysis highlights the economic advantage of the drug-free alternative, given the substantial cost reduction observed in the sedation-free group. This study underscores the feasibility of implementing sedation-free procedures as a cost-effective and successful option for upper GI endoscopy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无镇静上消化道内窥镜检查及其成本效益
本研究旨在确定无镇静上消化道内镜的成功率,并评估这种无药物方法的成本-效果。该研究包括在2020年2月至2022年12月期间接受胃镜检查的患者。记录了年龄和性别等人口统计信息,以及临床数据,包括手术是否使用镇静和患者的耐受性状况。统计分析显示镇静组和非镇静组在手术成功率方面无显著差异。有趣的是,在两组之间观察到43%的显著成本差异,无镇静组表现出更高的成本效益。尽管使用镇静的费用高出近50%,但两组在成功完成手术方面没有显着差异。本研究结果表明,无镇静的上消化道内镜可以达到与镇静辅助入路相当的成功率。此外,成本效益分析强调了无药物替代方案的经济优势,因为在无镇静组中观察到大量的成本降低。本研究强调了在上消化道内镜检查中实施无镇静手术的可行性,这是一种经济有效且成功的选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The beneficial effects of ivabradine against myocardial damage induced by isoproterenol in rats Assessment of enteral nutrition through feeding stomas or gastric tubes in digestive surgery What had changed in patient incoming to ear, nose and throat policlinics during COVID-19 Pandemic? The impact of statin therapy in the COVID-19 patients with very high cardiovascular risk Three-dimentional reposition of tibial tubercle and surgical procedure of permanent dislocation of the patella
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1