Vertical and Horizontal Wage Dispersion and Mobility Outcomes: Evidence from the Swedish Microdata

Aleksandra J. Kacperczyk, Chanchal Balachandran
{"title":"Vertical and Horizontal Wage Dispersion and Mobility Outcomes: Evidence from the Swedish Microdata","authors":"Aleksandra J. Kacperczyk, Chanchal Balachandran","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using employer–employee matched data from Sweden between 2001 and 2008, we test hypotheses designed to assess the contingent nature of the relationship between wage dispersion and cross-firm mobility. Whereas past research has mostly established that dispersed wages increase interfirm mobility, we investigate the conditions under which pay variance might have the opposite effect, serving to retain workers. We propose that the effect of wage dispersion is contingent on organizational rank and that it depends on whether wages are dispersed vertically (between job levels) or horizontally (within the same job level). We find that vertical wage dispersion suppresses cross-firm mobility because it is associated with outcomes beneficial for employees, such as attractive advancement opportunities. By contrast, horizontal wage dispersion increases cross-firm mobility because it is associated with outcomes harmful for employees, such as inequity concerns. We further find that the vertical-dispersion effect is ampli...","PeriodicalId":93599,"journal":{"name":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","volume":"44 1","pages":"17-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Using employer–employee matched data from Sweden between 2001 and 2008, we test hypotheses designed to assess the contingent nature of the relationship between wage dispersion and cross-firm mobility. Whereas past research has mostly established that dispersed wages increase interfirm mobility, we investigate the conditions under which pay variance might have the opposite effect, serving to retain workers. We propose that the effect of wage dispersion is contingent on organizational rank and that it depends on whether wages are dispersed vertically (between job levels) or horizontally (within the same job level). We find that vertical wage dispersion suppresses cross-firm mobility because it is associated with outcomes beneficial for employees, such as attractive advancement opportunities. By contrast, horizontal wage dispersion increases cross-firm mobility because it is associated with outcomes harmful for employees, such as inequity concerns. We further find that the vertical-dispersion effect is ampli...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵向和横向工资分散和流动性结果:来自瑞典微观数据的证据
利用瑞典2001年至2008年的雇主-雇员匹配数据,我们检验了旨在评估工资分散与跨企业流动性之间关系的偶然性质的假设。尽管过去的研究大多已经确定,分散的工资增加了企业间的流动性,但我们调查了薪酬差异可能产生相反效果的条件,有助于留住工人。我们提出,工资分散的影响取决于组织级别,它取决于工资是垂直分散(在工作级别之间)还是水平分散(在同一工作级别内)。我们发现,纵向工资分散抑制了跨公司的流动性,因为它与对员工有利的结果有关,比如有吸引力的晋升机会。相比之下,横向工资分散增加了公司间的流动性,因为它与对员工有害的结果有关,比如不平等问题。我们进一步发现,垂直色散效应是放大的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees' Problem Solving Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory The Lasting Benefits of Teams: Tie Vitality After Teams Disband Falling Not Far from the Tree: Entrepreneurs and Organizational Heritage Blurred Lines: How the Collectivism Norm Operates Through Perceived Group Diversity to Boost or Harm Group Performance in Himalayan Mountain Climbing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1