Coverage and equity of maternal and newborn health care in rural Nigeria, Ethiopia and India

IF 11.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Canadian Medical Association journal Pub Date : 2019-10-28 DOI:10.1503/cmaj.190219
Tanya Marchant, E. Beaumont, K. Makowiecka, D. Berhanu, T. Tessema, M. Gautham, Kultar Singh, N. Umar, A. Usman, K. Tomlin, S. Cousens, Elizabeth Allen, J. Schellenberg
{"title":"Coverage and equity of maternal and newborn health care in rural Nigeria, Ethiopia and India","authors":"Tanya Marchant, E. Beaumont, K. Makowiecka, D. Berhanu, T. Tessema, M. Gautham, Kultar Singh, N. Umar, A. Usman, K. Tomlin, S. Cousens, Elizabeth Allen, J. Schellenberg","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.190219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Despite progress toward meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, a large burden of maternal and neonatal mortality persists for the most vulnerable people in rural areas. We assessed coverage, coverage change and inequity for 8 maternal and newborn health care indicators in parts of rural Nigeria, Ethiopia and India. METHODS: We examined coverage changes and inequity in 2012 and 2015 in 3 high-burden populations where multiple actors were attempting to improve outcomes. We conducted cluster-based household surveys using a structured questionnaire to collect 8 priority indicators, disaggregated by relative household socioeconomic status. Where there was evidence of a change in coverage between 2012 and 2015, we used binomial regression models to assess whether the change reduced inequity. RESULTS: In 2015, we interviewed women with a birth in the previous 12 months in Gombe, Nigeria (n = 1100 women), Ethiopia (n = 404) and Uttar Pradesh, India (n = 584). Among the 8 indicators, 2 positive coverage changes were observed in each of Gombe and Uttar Pradesh, and 5 in Ethiopia. Coverage improvements occurred equally for all socioeconomic groups, with little improvement in inequity. For example, in Ethiopia, coverage of facility delivery almost tripled, increasing from 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9%–25%) to 43% (95% CI 33%–54%). This change was similar across socioeconomic groups (p = 0.2). By 2015, the poorest women had about the same facility delivery coverage as the least poor women had had in 2012 (32% and 36%, respectively), but coverage for the least poor had increased to 60%. INTERPRETATION: Although coverage increased equitably because of various community-based interventions, underlying inequities persisted. Action is needed to address the needs of the most vulnerable women, particularly those living in the most rural areas.","PeriodicalId":9609,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Association journal","volume":"84 1","pages":"E1179 - E1188"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190219","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite progress toward meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, a large burden of maternal and neonatal mortality persists for the most vulnerable people in rural areas. We assessed coverage, coverage change and inequity for 8 maternal and newborn health care indicators in parts of rural Nigeria, Ethiopia and India. METHODS: We examined coverage changes and inequity in 2012 and 2015 in 3 high-burden populations where multiple actors were attempting to improve outcomes. We conducted cluster-based household surveys using a structured questionnaire to collect 8 priority indicators, disaggregated by relative household socioeconomic status. Where there was evidence of a change in coverage between 2012 and 2015, we used binomial regression models to assess whether the change reduced inequity. RESULTS: In 2015, we interviewed women with a birth in the previous 12 months in Gombe, Nigeria (n = 1100 women), Ethiopia (n = 404) and Uttar Pradesh, India (n = 584). Among the 8 indicators, 2 positive coverage changes were observed in each of Gombe and Uttar Pradesh, and 5 in Ethiopia. Coverage improvements occurred equally for all socioeconomic groups, with little improvement in inequity. For example, in Ethiopia, coverage of facility delivery almost tripled, increasing from 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9%–25%) to 43% (95% CI 33%–54%). This change was similar across socioeconomic groups (p = 0.2). By 2015, the poorest women had about the same facility delivery coverage as the least poor women had had in 2012 (32% and 36%, respectively), but coverage for the least poor had increased to 60%. INTERPRETATION: Although coverage increased equitably because of various community-based interventions, underlying inequities persisted. Action is needed to address the needs of the most vulnerable women, particularly those living in the most rural areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚、埃塞俄比亚和印度农村地区孕产妇和新生儿保健的覆盖面和公平性
背景:尽管在实现可持续发展目标方面取得了进展,但农村地区最脆弱人群的孕产妇和新生儿死亡率负担仍然很大。我们评估了尼日利亚、埃塞俄比亚和印度部分农村地区8项孕产妇和新生儿卫生保健指标的覆盖率、覆盖率变化和不平等。方法:我们检查了2012年和2015年3个高负担人群的覆盖变化和不公平,这些人群中有多个参与者试图改善结果。我们进行了基于集群的家庭调查,使用结构化问卷收集了8个优先指标,按家庭相对社会经济地位分类。在2012年至2015年间,有证据表明覆盖率发生了变化,我们使用二项回归模型来评估这种变化是否减少了不平等。结果:2015年,我们在尼日利亚贡贝(n = 1100)、埃塞俄比亚(n = 404)和印度北方邦(n = 584)访问了过去12个月内分娩的妇女。在8项指标中,贡贝和北方邦各有2项积极的覆盖率变化,埃塞俄比亚有5项。所有社会经济群体的覆盖率都得到了同样的改善,而不平等状况几乎没有改善。例如,在埃塞俄比亚,设施交付的覆盖率几乎增加了两倍,从15%(95%置信区间[CI] 9%-25%)增加到43%(95%置信区间[CI] 33%-54%)。这种变化在不同的社会经济群体中也相似(p = 0.2)。到2015年,最贫困妇女的设施分娩覆盖率与最贫困妇女在2012年的覆盖率大致相同(分别为32%和36%),但最贫困妇女的覆盖率已增加到60%。解释:尽管由于各种基于社区的干预措施,覆盖率公平地增加了,但潜在的不平等仍然存在。需要采取行动解决最脆弱妇女的需要,特别是生活在最农村地区的妇女的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Medical Association journal
Canadian Medical Association journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) is a peer-reviewed general medical journal renowned for publishing original research, commentaries, analyses, reviews, clinical practice updates, and editorials. Led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kirsten Patrick, it has a significant impact on healthcare in Canada and globally, with a 2022 impact factor of 17.4. Its mission is to promote knowledge vital for the health of Canadians and the global community, guided by values of service, evidence, and integrity. The journal's vision emphasizes the importance of the best evidence, practice, and health outcomes. CMAJ covers a broad range of topics, focusing on contributing to the evidence base, influencing clinical practice, and raising awareness of pressing health issues among policymakers and the public. Since 2020, with the appointment of a Lead of Patient Involvement, CMAJ is committed to integrating patients into its governance and operations, encouraging their content submissions.
期刊最新文献
Chutes chez les personnes âgées. Clinician entrepreneurs should be supported to address Canada's health care challenges. Crise de santé mentale chez les étudiantes et étudiants. Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis to prevent bacterial sexually transmitted infections. Effect of single-entry referral models and team-based care on wait times for hip and knee joint replacement in Ontario: a simulation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1