Less Damaging Drilling Fluids: Development and Lab Testing

Sara Alkhalaf, Mohammed B. Al-Awami, V. Wagle, A. Al-Yami
{"title":"Less Damaging Drilling Fluids: Development and Lab Testing","authors":"Sara Alkhalaf, Mohammed B. Al-Awami, V. Wagle, A. Al-Yami","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19205-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The properties of the selected drilling fluid must be carefully planned to have minimal effects on the near-wellbore pore spaces. Proper mixing, monitoring, and maintenance of the drilling fluid throughout the drilling operations are as critical as the careful planning. Solids control equipment should be operated to remove the cuttings and maintain the density and rheological properties consistent.\n The characteristics of an effective reservoir fluid system include stability at high pressures and temperatures, proper and stable density, good filtration control, ability to transport cuttings, and minimal damage to formation pore spaces, Davidson et al. 1997. Selection of the most suitable drilling fluid additives takes into consideration numerous factors such as downhole conditions (pressure and temperature), formation type and petro physical properties, and the objective of the drilling operation.\n The experimental work in this paper involved rheological properties, thermal stability, API and HT/HP filtration and acid filter cake removal efficiency.\n Tangentional flooding showed that water based Mn3O4 drill-in fluid has the highest return permeability compared to the typical drill-in fluids (KCl/CaCO3/Barite and potassium drill-in fluids). Potassium formate drill-in fluid filtrate was not compatible with brine. This incompatibility explained its low return permeability in spite of its low solids content. Oil based drilling fluid was developed and tested with good acceptable results. Filter cake removal efficiency was showing more than 95%, indicating its removable formation damage.","PeriodicalId":11267,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19205-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The properties of the selected drilling fluid must be carefully planned to have minimal effects on the near-wellbore pore spaces. Proper mixing, monitoring, and maintenance of the drilling fluid throughout the drilling operations are as critical as the careful planning. Solids control equipment should be operated to remove the cuttings and maintain the density and rheological properties consistent. The characteristics of an effective reservoir fluid system include stability at high pressures and temperatures, proper and stable density, good filtration control, ability to transport cuttings, and minimal damage to formation pore spaces, Davidson et al. 1997. Selection of the most suitable drilling fluid additives takes into consideration numerous factors such as downhole conditions (pressure and temperature), formation type and petro physical properties, and the objective of the drilling operation. The experimental work in this paper involved rheological properties, thermal stability, API and HT/HP filtration and acid filter cake removal efficiency. Tangentional flooding showed that water based Mn3O4 drill-in fluid has the highest return permeability compared to the typical drill-in fluids (KCl/CaCO3/Barite and potassium drill-in fluids). Potassium formate drill-in fluid filtrate was not compatible with brine. This incompatibility explained its low return permeability in spite of its low solids content. Oil based drilling fluid was developed and tested with good acceptable results. Filter cake removal efficiency was showing more than 95%, indicating its removable formation damage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低破坏性钻井液:开发和实验室测试
必须仔细规划所选钻井液的性质,使其对近井孔隙空间的影响最小。在整个钻井作业过程中,钻井液的适当混合、监测和维护与精心规划一样至关重要。应使用固控设备去除岩屑,并保持密度和流变性能的一致性。Davidson等人,1997年,有效的储层流体体系的特征包括在高压和高温下的稳定性、适当和稳定的密度、良好的过滤控制、输送岩屑的能力以及对地层孔隙空间的最小破坏。选择最合适的钻井液添加剂需要考虑许多因素,如井下条件(压力和温度)、地层类型和石油物理性质,以及钻井作业的目的。本文的实验工作包括流变性能、热稳定性、原料药、高温高压过滤和酸滤饼去除效率。切向驱油结果表明,与典型钻井液(KCl/CaCO3/重晶石和钾钻井液)相比,水基Mn3O4钻井液具有最高的回渗性。甲酸钾钻井液滤液与卤水不相容。这种不相容性解释了尽管其固体含量低,但其回渗率却很低。开发并测试了油基钻井液,取得了良好的效果。滤饼去除效率达95%以上,表明其可去除地层损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Modified Plane of Weakness Method Enables Drilling Horizontal Wells Successfully in Ordos Basin, China A Practical Method to Match Trajectories of a Horizontal Well in Time Domain and in Depth in Ancient Buried Hill 3D Permeability Characterization Based on Pore Structure Analysis and Multi-Parameters Seismic Inversion and Its Application in H Oilfield Research and Application on Intensive Drilling Model of Large Platforms Disclose Hidden Hydrocarbon HC Reserves from Additional Zone of Interest AZIs Using dT LogR Method in Lunar Field, Gulf of Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1