{"title":"Regulatory Factors that Contributed to the Global Financial Crisis","authors":"Nestor A. Espenilla","doi":"10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The source of the global financial crisis of 2008 may be viewed from two ideological perspectives: regulatory failure in the credit risk transfer (CRT) market; and monetary laxity, pointing to the inherent nature of financial regulation. This paper is an exposition of the regulatory factors that contributed to the global financial crisis by highlighting the weaknesses in the CRT market believed to have catalyzed the present economic slowdown. These factors include active involvement of unregulated entities in the market; divergent regulatory treatment of CRT transactions across different financial institutions; insufficient supervisory data on CRT transactions; and insufficient capital requirement for CRT transactions. The paper addresses the presence of monetary laxity evidenced by the procyclical nature of some policies that reinforced the market downturn. It looks into each factor closely before concluding that regulations are by no means, an easy task. They have to constantly strike a balance between allowing innovations for the development of the financial markets to support further development in the real economy and ensuring a stable financial system. The bottom line is for regulators to caution themselves against over-regulation that would inhibit innovation which is a tempting proposition amidst all these issues on regulatory failure.","PeriodicalId":39323,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The source of the global financial crisis of 2008 may be viewed from two ideological perspectives: regulatory failure in the credit risk transfer (CRT) market; and monetary laxity, pointing to the inherent nature of financial regulation. This paper is an exposition of the regulatory factors that contributed to the global financial crisis by highlighting the weaknesses in the CRT market believed to have catalyzed the present economic slowdown. These factors include active involvement of unregulated entities in the market; divergent regulatory treatment of CRT transactions across different financial institutions; insufficient supervisory data on CRT transactions; and insufficient capital requirement for CRT transactions. The paper addresses the presence of monetary laxity evidenced by the procyclical nature of some policies that reinforced the market downturn. It looks into each factor closely before concluding that regulations are by no means, an easy task. They have to constantly strike a balance between allowing innovations for the development of the financial markets to support further development in the real economy and ensuring a stable financial system. The bottom line is for regulators to caution themselves against over-regulation that would inhibit innovation which is a tempting proposition amidst all these issues on regulatory failure.
期刊介绍:
The Asia-Pacific Social Science Review (APSSR) is an internationally refereed journal published biannually (June and December) by De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. It aims to be a leading venue for authors seeking to share their data and perspectives on compelling and emerging topics in the social sciences with, and to create an impact on, the region’s communities of academics, researchers, students, civil society, policymakers, development specialists, among others. Topics related to or with implications for the region that are pursued employing sound methodologies and comparative, and inter, multi and transdisciplinary approaches are of particular interest.