Differential evolution for early-phase offshore oilfield design considering uncertainties in initial oil-in-place and well productivity

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Upstream Oil and Gas Technology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100055
Bilal , Millie Pant , Milan Stanko , Leonardo Sales
{"title":"Differential evolution for early-phase offshore oilfield design considering uncertainties in initial oil-in-place and well productivity","authors":"Bilal ,&nbsp;Millie Pant ,&nbsp;Milan Stanko ,&nbsp;Leonardo Sales","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During the early phases of offshore oil field development, field planners must decide upon general design features such as the required number of wells and maximum oil processing capacity (field plateau rate), usually by performing sensitivity studies. These design choices are then locked in subsequent development stages and often prevent from achieving optimal field designs in later planning stages when more information is available and uncertainties are reduced.</p><p>In the present study, we propose using numerical optimization of net present value (NPV) to advice field planners when deciding on the appropriate number of wells, maximum oil processing capacity (plateau rate) in a Brazilian offshore oil field. Differential Evolution (DE) is employed for solving the optimization models. The uncertainties considered are well productivity and initial oil-in-place, handled by (1) using the mean of the distributions and (2) Monte Carlo simulation. A multi-objective optimization was also formulated and solved including ultimate recovery factor in addition to net present value.</p><p>The proposed method successfully computes probability distributions of optimal number of wells, plateau rate and NPV. If one wishes to compute the mean of such distributions only, for most cases it is adequate to run an optimization using the mean of the input values instead of performing Monte Carlo sampling. The multi-objective optimization allows to find field designs with high ultimate recovery factor and high NPV. In this case, the value of NPV is similar to the optimum NPV value when optimizing NPV only. The methods described could provide decision support to field planners in early stages of field development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260421000256/pdfft?md5=433f7d4b7039ed44d4d566144500441a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666260421000256-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260421000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

During the early phases of offshore oil field development, field planners must decide upon general design features such as the required number of wells and maximum oil processing capacity (field plateau rate), usually by performing sensitivity studies. These design choices are then locked in subsequent development stages and often prevent from achieving optimal field designs in later planning stages when more information is available and uncertainties are reduced.

In the present study, we propose using numerical optimization of net present value (NPV) to advice field planners when deciding on the appropriate number of wells, maximum oil processing capacity (plateau rate) in a Brazilian offshore oil field. Differential Evolution (DE) is employed for solving the optimization models. The uncertainties considered are well productivity and initial oil-in-place, handled by (1) using the mean of the distributions and (2) Monte Carlo simulation. A multi-objective optimization was also formulated and solved including ultimate recovery factor in addition to net present value.

The proposed method successfully computes probability distributions of optimal number of wells, plateau rate and NPV. If one wishes to compute the mean of such distributions only, for most cases it is adequate to run an optimization using the mean of the input values instead of performing Monte Carlo sampling. The multi-objective optimization allows to find field designs with high ultimate recovery factor and high NPV. In this case, the value of NPV is similar to the optimum NPV value when optimizing NPV only. The methods described could provide decision support to field planners in early stages of field development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑初始产油和油井产能不确定性的早期海上油田设计差分演化
在海上油田开发的早期阶段,油田规划者必须通过进行敏感性研究来确定一般设计特征,例如所需的油井数量和最大石油处理能力(油田平台率)。然后,这些设计选择被锁定在随后的开发阶段,并且在后期规划阶段,当更多的信息可用且不确定性减少时,往往无法实现最佳的现场设计。在本研究中,我们建议使用净现值(NPV)的数值优化来建议油田规划者在决定巴西海上油田的适当井数,最大石油处理能力(平台率)时。采用差分进化方法求解优化模型。考虑的不确定性是油井产能和初始产油量,处理方法是(1)使用分布的平均值和(2)蒙特卡罗模拟。建立了包括最终采收率和净现值在内的多目标优化问题。该方法成功地计算了最优井数、平台率和净现值的概率分布。如果只希望计算这些分布的均值,在大多数情况下,使用输入值的均值而不是执行蒙特卡罗抽样来运行优化就足够了。多目标优化可以找到具有高最终采收率和高净现值的油田设计。此时,仅优化NPV时的NPV值与最优NPV值相近。所描述的方法可以为现场规划人员在现场开发的早期阶段提供决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of pump jacks with theories and experiments Well perforating—More than reservoir connection A new method for predicting casing wear in highly deviated wells using mud logging data Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1