Effects of traditional tenderization treatments on Transversus abdominis muscles obtained from Holstein carcasses

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE South African Journal of Animal Science Pub Date : 2022-05-09 DOI:10.4314/sajas.v51i6.4
H. Benli, L.A. Tokgoz
{"title":"Effects of traditional tenderization treatments on Transversus abdominis muscles obtained from Holstein carcasses","authors":"H. Benli, L.A. Tokgoz","doi":"10.4314/sajas.v51i6.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of traditional tenderization treatments on Transversus abdominis (TrA) muscles (inside skirts) of Holstein carcasses. The muscles were collected from carcasses of 12 healthy 18- to 22-month-old Holstein steers that had been subjected to similar care and nutrition programmes. A replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design was used to compare the effects of the treatments of blade tenderization, enzymatic tenderization, marination and control. Blade tenderization and enzymatic tenderization had statistically similar colour values to the control, whereas marination had negative effects on the colour of raw and cooked samples. Blade tenderization had the lowest mean Warner-Bratzler shear force value (37.88 N), whereas enzymatic tenderization had the second lowest value (42.87 N). In sensory evaluation, significant differences were observed when the samples cooked to an internal temperature of 82 °C. A simple ranking test indicated that the most preferred sample was obtained with the blade tenderization. Also, blade tenderization and then enzymatic tenderization had the highest scores for tenderness in sensory evaluation. Although Holstein cattle are known for superior milk production and may not be a suitable breed for high-quality meat production, the results indicated that blade tenderization and enzymatic tenderization could be used to improve the tenderness of TrA steaks from Holstein carcasses and use them better.","PeriodicalId":21869,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Animal Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v51i6.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of traditional tenderization treatments on Transversus abdominis (TrA) muscles (inside skirts) of Holstein carcasses. The muscles were collected from carcasses of 12 healthy 18- to 22-month-old Holstein steers that had been subjected to similar care and nutrition programmes. A replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design was used to compare the effects of the treatments of blade tenderization, enzymatic tenderization, marination and control. Blade tenderization and enzymatic tenderization had statistically similar colour values to the control, whereas marination had negative effects on the colour of raw and cooked samples. Blade tenderization had the lowest mean Warner-Bratzler shear force value (37.88 N), whereas enzymatic tenderization had the second lowest value (42.87 N). In sensory evaluation, significant differences were observed when the samples cooked to an internal temperature of 82 °C. A simple ranking test indicated that the most preferred sample was obtained with the blade tenderization. Also, blade tenderization and then enzymatic tenderization had the highest scores for tenderness in sensory evaluation. Although Holstein cattle are known for superior milk production and may not be a suitable breed for high-quality meat production, the results indicated that blade tenderization and enzymatic tenderization could be used to improve the tenderness of TrA steaks from Holstein carcasses and use them better.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统嫩化处理对荷斯坦鼠腹横肌的影响
本研究的目的是评估传统嫩化处理对荷斯坦鼠胴体腹横肌(TrA)(裙内)的影响。这些肌肉是从12头健康的18至22个月大的荷斯坦阉牛的尸体上收集的,这些阉牛接受了类似的护理和营养计划。采用重复的4 × 4拉丁方设计比较叶片嫩化、酶化嫩化、腌制和对照处理的效果。叶片嫩化和酶嫩化的颜色值与对照组有统计学上的相似,而腌制对生和熟样品的颜色有负面影响。叶片嫩化的平均Warner-Bratzler剪切力值最低(37.88 N),而酶嫩化的平均Warner-Bratzler剪切力值次之(42.87 N)。在感官评价中,当样品煮至内部温度为82°C时,观察到显著差异。简单的排序试验表明,叶片嫩化得到了最优的试样。在感官评价中,叶片嫩化的嫩度得分最高,其次是酶嫩化。虽然荷斯坦牛的产奶量很好,但可能不是优质肉制品的合适品种,但结果表明,叶片嫩化和酶嫩化可以提高荷斯坦牛胴体TrA牛排的嫩度,并更好地利用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Animal Science
South African Journal of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Animal Science is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for publication of original scientific articles and reviews in the field of animal science. The journal publishes reports of research dealing with production of farmed animal species (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry and ostriches), as well as pertinent aspects of research on aquatic and wildlife species. Disciplines covered nutrition, genetics, physiology, and production systems. Systematic research on animal products, behaviour, and welfare are also invited. Rigorous testing of well-specified hypotheses is expected.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the efficiency of smallholder wool farmers in the changing paradigms of the Free State province of South Africa In vitro ruminal fermentation parameters of canola meal protein in response to incremental doses of gamma irradiation Effects of yeast hydrolysate versus plasma powder on growth, immunity, and intestinal morphology of weanling piglets Performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on diets with different levels of concentrate Synthesis and antibacterial activity of a ZnO-fibre complex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1