Diffusion: Transmission and Acceptance

Q4 Social Sciences Yearbook of Physical Anthropology Pub Date : 1955-01-01 DOI:10.1086/yearanth.0.3031144
W. Koppers
{"title":"Diffusion: Transmission and Acceptance","authors":"W. Koppers","doi":"10.1086/yearanth.0.3031144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"lution.\"1 It is hardly necessary to say that evolution, thus understood, is very differ? ent from the organic evolution of natural history and that it means evolution due to human action and to the unfolding of all that the spirit of man has devised and the power of man has created. Evolution, thus defined, belongs to the realm of history. Are historically minded ethnologists justified in claiming the same principle for their own field? In other words: are the","PeriodicalId":49351,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of Physical Anthropology","volume":"95 1","pages":"169 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1955-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of Physical Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/yearanth.0.3031144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

lution."1 It is hardly necessary to say that evolution, thus understood, is very differ? ent from the organic evolution of natural history and that it means evolution due to human action and to the unfolding of all that the spirit of man has devised and the power of man has created. Evolution, thus defined, belongs to the realm of history. Are historically minded ethnologists justified in claiming the same principle for their own field? In other words: are the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩散:传播与接受
全局。“几乎没有必要说,这样理解的进化是非常不同的。”它来自自然历史的有机进化,它意味着人类行为的进化,以及人类精神所设计的一切和人类力量所创造的一切的展开。这样定义的进化属于历史的范畴。具有历史意识的民族学家在他们自己的领域中主张同样的原则是正当的吗?换句话说:是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of Physical Anthropology
Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 生物-进化生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward Communication between Sociology and Anthropology Chronology and Dating Processes The Study of Complex Civilizations New World Culture History Dissertations in Anthropology: Submitted to Educational Institutions of the World in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Ph.D. Degree or Equivalent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1