A study regarding the effect of a belief in school meritocracy in a system justification belief and teacher social justice advocacy: focusing on elementary school teachers born in the 1990s

Hanbyul Seo, JoonJong Son
{"title":"A study regarding the effect of a belief in school meritocracy in a system justification belief and teacher social justice advocacy: focusing on elementary school teachers born in the 1990s","authors":"Hanbyul Seo, JoonJong Son","doi":"10.14333/kjte.2022.38.5.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to ascertain how the belief in school meritocracy (BSM) of teachers relates to their system justification belief (SJB), and how it affects teacher social justice advocacy, focusing on elementary school teachers born in the 1990s. \nMethods: This study surveyed 406 elementary school teachers working in ten cities nationwide. Multiple regression was utilized to analyze which factors affect BSM and SJB. Multiple mediation analysis was then conducted to confirm the mediating effect of SJB between BSM and teacher social justice advocacy. \nResults: The results of the analyses would appear to indicate that the higher the degree of the BSM of a teacher is, the higher the degree of the SJB is. On the other hand, the BSM of the teachers born in the 90s was formed regardless of their personal characteristics, while the BSM of the teachers of other ages was mainly influenced by political orientation. Lastly, the BSM of the teachers of other ages had an indirect effect of reducing teachers' social justice advocacy (TSJA) mediated by economic system justification. In contrast, the BSM of teachers born in the 90s directly promoted teacher social justice advocacy, and there was no indirect effect through the SJB. \nConclusion: The findings show that the BSM, which is believed to serve as a principle of education fairness, is associated with system justification that rationalizes status quo. On the other hand, the finding that the BSM of the teachers born in 90s increased the TSJA implies that the BSM does not always lead to the result of legitimizing an unfair social structure even though the BSM connects to a system justification motive. Therefore, It is argued that, by discerning what meritocratic assumption teachers are supporting as their educational belief, their BSM could work as norms not for inegalitarian structure, but for advocating just education.","PeriodicalId":22672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2022.38.5.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to ascertain how the belief in school meritocracy (BSM) of teachers relates to their system justification belief (SJB), and how it affects teacher social justice advocacy, focusing on elementary school teachers born in the 1990s. Methods: This study surveyed 406 elementary school teachers working in ten cities nationwide. Multiple regression was utilized to analyze which factors affect BSM and SJB. Multiple mediation analysis was then conducted to confirm the mediating effect of SJB between BSM and teacher social justice advocacy. Results: The results of the analyses would appear to indicate that the higher the degree of the BSM of a teacher is, the higher the degree of the SJB is. On the other hand, the BSM of the teachers born in the 90s was formed regardless of their personal characteristics, while the BSM of the teachers of other ages was mainly influenced by political orientation. Lastly, the BSM of the teachers of other ages had an indirect effect of reducing teachers' social justice advocacy (TSJA) mediated by economic system justification. In contrast, the BSM of teachers born in the 90s directly promoted teacher social justice advocacy, and there was no indirect effect through the SJB. Conclusion: The findings show that the BSM, which is believed to serve as a principle of education fairness, is associated with system justification that rationalizes status quo. On the other hand, the finding that the BSM of the teachers born in 90s increased the TSJA implies that the BSM does not always lead to the result of legitimizing an unfair social structure even though the BSM connects to a system justification motive. Therefore, It is argued that, by discerning what meritocratic assumption teachers are supporting as their educational belief, their BSM could work as norms not for inegalitarian structure, but for advocating just education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校精英信仰对制度辩护信仰和教师社会正义倡导的影响研究——以90后小学教师为例
目的:本研究以90后小学教师为研究对象,探讨教师的学校精英信仰与制度辩护信仰之间的关系,以及制度辩护信仰对教师社会正义倡导的影响。方法:对全国10个城市的406名小学教师进行问卷调查。采用多元回归分析影响BSM和SJB的因素。在此基础上,通过多元中介分析来验证SJB在BSM与教师社会正义倡导之间的中介作用。结果:分析结果似乎表明,教师的BSM程度越高,其SJB程度也越高。另一方面,90后教师的BSM的形成与他们的个人特征无关,而其他年龄段教师的BSM主要受政治取向的影响。最后,其他年龄段教师的BSM对经济制度正当性介导的教师社会正义倡导(TSJA)有间接降低作用。90后教师的BSM直接促进了教师的社会正义倡导,通过SJB没有产生间接影响。结论:研究结果表明,被认为是教育公平原则的BSM与使现状合理化的制度正当性有关。另一方面,90后教师的BSM增加了TSJA,这表明BSM并不总是导致不公平社会结构合法化的结果,尽管BSM与制度正当化动机有关。因此,本文认为,通过识别教师支持的精英主义假设作为他们的教育信仰,他们的BSM可以作为规范,而不是不平等的结构,而是倡导公正的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Life Respect in Elementary School Education with the Morals Subject from the Perspective of Population Education The Effects of Microteaching on English T eachers’ Efficacy with Pre-service Elementary School Teachers Exploring the meaning of movement according to pre-service teachers’ acquisition of exercise skills Defect and Compensation: An Inquiry of Methodological Principles for a Moral Instructional Activity Based on L. S. Vygotsky’s Theory An Exploration of the Operation Cases and Improvement Methods in a Small Middle School Joint Physical Education Curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1