Assessment of Groundwater Quality and Soil Salinity/Status Under Various Irrigation Systems in Arid Region of Jamshoro District

A. H. Memon, A. G. Soomro, Reena Majid Memon, B. Lashari, M. Babar, K. Ansari
{"title":"Assessment of Groundwater Quality and Soil Salinity/Status Under Various Irrigation Systems in Arid Region of Jamshoro District","authors":"A. H. Memon, A. G. Soomro, Reena Majid Memon, B. Lashari, M. Babar, K. Ansari","doi":"10.52763/PJSIR.PHYS.SCI.64.3.2021.214.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nThe agricultural lands are being affected due to groundwater (GW) quality issues. To address this worldwide problematic situation, various irrigation studies have been practiced to identify the effects on the soil conditions. The current study has been designed to assess the GW quality and soil salinity/sodicity by different irrigation techniques in the remote mountainous area of Jamshoro district at Gul Muhammad Khaskheli farm Thana Boula Khan. The experimental plot was designed under furrow, pitcher and poly ethylene bag irrigation system. These soil characteristics indicated that the drain-ability of the soil was high, with an infiltration rate of 1.60 cm/h and water holding capacity was low. Water samples were collected at each irrigation time from sowing to harvest. The soil understudy was non-saline (ECe < 4.0 dS/m) and non-sodic (pH < 8.0, SAR < 7.5 and ESP < 15.0) before crop sowing in all the three methods of irrigation at all the three sampling depths, i.e., 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm and 30-60 cm. Thus, the quality of water used for cultivation of ladyfinger/Okra crop under all irrigation methods was Class-I quality water.The investigated results shown that ECw (electrical conductivity of water) was < 1.5 dS/m, pH < 8.0, SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) < 10.0 and RSC (residual sodium carbonate) were non detective. After crop harvest changed a little bit, change was observed in the soil, i.e., under furrow and pitcher irrigation method, the ECe, SAR. and ESP (exchangeable sodium percentage) decreased in the wetted zone and increased at the wetted periphery. Under the polyethylene bag irrigation method, ECe, SAR and ESP decreased at depths 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm but these increased at lower depth, i.e., 30-60 cm after crop harvest. However, the soil remained non-saline and non-sodic. \n ","PeriodicalId":19924,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research Series A: Physical Sciences","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research Series A: Physical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52763/PJSIR.PHYS.SCI.64.3.2021.214.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  The agricultural lands are being affected due to groundwater (GW) quality issues. To address this worldwide problematic situation, various irrigation studies have been practiced to identify the effects on the soil conditions. The current study has been designed to assess the GW quality and soil salinity/sodicity by different irrigation techniques in the remote mountainous area of Jamshoro district at Gul Muhammad Khaskheli farm Thana Boula Khan. The experimental plot was designed under furrow, pitcher and poly ethylene bag irrigation system. These soil characteristics indicated that the drain-ability of the soil was high, with an infiltration rate of 1.60 cm/h and water holding capacity was low. Water samples were collected at each irrigation time from sowing to harvest. The soil understudy was non-saline (ECe < 4.0 dS/m) and non-sodic (pH < 8.0, SAR < 7.5 and ESP < 15.0) before crop sowing in all the three methods of irrigation at all the three sampling depths, i.e., 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm and 30-60 cm. Thus, the quality of water used for cultivation of ladyfinger/Okra crop under all irrigation methods was Class-I quality water.The investigated results shown that ECw (electrical conductivity of water) was < 1.5 dS/m, pH < 8.0, SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) < 10.0 and RSC (residual sodium carbonate) were non detective. After crop harvest changed a little bit, change was observed in the soil, i.e., under furrow and pitcher irrigation method, the ECe, SAR. and ESP (exchangeable sodium percentage) decreased in the wetted zone and increased at the wetted periphery. Under the polyethylene bag irrigation method, ECe, SAR and ESP decreased at depths 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm but these increased at lower depth, i.e., 30-60 cm after crop harvest. However, the soil remained non-saline and non-sodic.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jamshoro干旱区不同灌溉方式下地下水水质和土壤盐分状况评价
由于地下水质量问题,农业用地受到影响。为了解决这一世界性的问题,人们进行了各种灌溉研究,以确定对土壤条件的影响。目前的研究旨在评估Gul Muhammad Khaskheli农场Thana Boula Khan的Jamshoro地区偏远山区不同灌溉技术的土壤质量和土壤盐分/碱度。试验小区采用沟灌、罐灌和聚乙烯袋灌方式。这些特征表明,土壤具有较高的排水性,入渗速率为1.60 cm/h,持水量较低。从播种到收获,每个灌溉时间采集水样。在0 ~ 15 cm、15 ~ 30 cm和30 ~ 60 cm 3个采样深度上,3种灌溉方式下作物播种前的土壤底质均为非盐碱化(ECe < 4.0 dS/m)和非盐碱化(pH < 8.0, SAR < 7.5, ESP < 15.0)。因此,在所有灌溉方式下,秋葵作物的水质均为i类优质水。结果表明:ECw(水的电导率)< 1.5 dS/m, pH < 8.0, SAR(钠吸附比)< 10.0,RSC(残余碳酸钠)不能检测。作物收获后土壤变化不大,沟灌和罐灌方式下土壤ECe、sar和ESP(交换性钠百分比)在湿润区降低,在湿润外围升高。聚乙烯袋灌方式下,土壤ECe、SAR和ESP在作物收获后30 ~ 60 cm深度下降,而在0 ~ 15 cm深度下降。然而,土壤保持不含盐和不含钠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Durability Studies on High Strength Concrete Health Monitoring and Breathing Support System Water Quality Modeling Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool: A Case Study of Rawal Watershed Design and Analysis of Wave Energy Converter Technologies Analysis of Vulnerabilities in System by Penetration Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1