Can Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Predict Lupus Nephritis Flares?

S. Fouad, M. Farris, Eman R. Mansour, Mayada Moneer
{"title":"Can Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Predict Lupus Nephritis Flares?","authors":"S. Fouad, M. Farris, Eman R. Mansour, Mayada Moneer","doi":"10.21608/ejmm.2023.281033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune multisystem disease with an array of variable presentations in which the kidney is the most affected organ and influences the overall outcome of the patients. Methodology: The study is a case control study conducted on 90 SLE patients diagnosed according to ACR criteria grouped into three subgroups. It aims at evaluating the role of serum tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in diagnosing renal flares and predicting the prognosis in lupus nephritis patients. Results: A highly significant difference was observed between both the SLE starting dialysis group, the SLE nephritis ( LN ) group, and the control group regarding neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and TNFα (p<0.001 & ˂ 0.001, respectively). The median serum Neutrophil/Lymphocyte and TNFα were statistically significantly higher in the SLE starting dialysis patient group than the LN patients and the control group. A cut-off value of ≤ 200 for serum TNFα level and of ≤ 4.8 for Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio sufficiently differentiated between the LN patients and the SLE patients starting dialysis. TNFα cut-off value showed sensitivity of 76.67%, specificity of 96.67%, positive predictive value of 95.8% and negative predictive value of 80.6 %. Neutrophil/Lymphocyte cut-off showed sensitivity of 70.00%, specificity of 70.00%, positive predictive value of 70.00% and negative predictive value of 70.00 %. Conclusion: NLR and TNFα serum levels appear to be useful biomarkers for disease flares and tissue injury in LN patients. Both can identify disease activities, relapses and remissions in lupus nephritis patients.","PeriodicalId":22549,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2023.281033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune multisystem disease with an array of variable presentations in which the kidney is the most affected organ and influences the overall outcome of the patients. Methodology: The study is a case control study conducted on 90 SLE patients diagnosed according to ACR criteria grouped into three subgroups. It aims at evaluating the role of serum tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in diagnosing renal flares and predicting the prognosis in lupus nephritis patients. Results: A highly significant difference was observed between both the SLE starting dialysis group, the SLE nephritis ( LN ) group, and the control group regarding neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and TNFα (p<0.001 & ˂ 0.001, respectively). The median serum Neutrophil/Lymphocyte and TNFα were statistically significantly higher in the SLE starting dialysis patient group than the LN patients and the control group. A cut-off value of ≤ 200 for serum TNFα level and of ≤ 4.8 for Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio sufficiently differentiated between the LN patients and the SLE patients starting dialysis. TNFα cut-off value showed sensitivity of 76.67%, specificity of 96.67%, positive predictive value of 95.8% and negative predictive value of 80.6 %. Neutrophil/Lymphocyte cut-off showed sensitivity of 70.00%, specificity of 70.00%, positive predictive value of 70.00% and negative predictive value of 70.00 %. Conclusion: NLR and TNFα serum levels appear to be useful biomarkers for disease flares and tissue injury in LN patients. Both can identify disease activities, relapses and remissions in lupus nephritis patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值和肿瘤坏死因子α能否预测狼疮性肾炎的发作?
背景:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种慢性自身免疫性多系统疾病,具有一系列不同的表现,其中肾脏是受影响最大的器官,影响患者的整体预后。方法:本研究为病例对照研究,将90例符合ACR标准的SLE患者分为3个亚组。目的探讨血清肿瘤坏死因子α (TNFα)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在狼疮性肾炎患者肾脏病变诊断及预后预测中的作用。结果:在SLE开始透析组、SLE肾炎(LN)组和对照组之间,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和TNFα有高度显著性差异(p<0.001和小于0.001)。SLE开始透析患者组中位血清中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞和TNFα高于LN患者和对照组,具有统计学意义。LN患者与开始透析的SLE患者的血清TNFα水平临界值≤200,中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值临界值≤4.8。TNFα截断值敏感性为76.67%,特异性为96.67%,阳性预测值为95.8%,阴性预测值为80.6%。中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞切断的敏感性为70.00%,特异性为70.00%,阳性预测值为70.00%,阴性预测值为70.00%。结论:NLR和TNFα血清水平似乎是LN患者疾病发作和组织损伤的有用生物标志物。两者都可以识别狼疮性肾炎患者的疾病活动、复发和缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights into Biofilm-based Multidrug Resistance in Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolated from Patients Hospitalized in Benha University Intensive Care Unit Association between Dysbiosis of Key Species of Nasal Microbiome and Allergic Rhinitis in Adult Patients Invasive Versus Noninvasive Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori infection Detection of Vancomycin Resistance among Hospital and Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Biofilm Formation by Acinetobacter Species Isolated from Intensive Care Units: Unveiling the Impact on Antibiotic Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1