Stakeholder Perception of Health Resources and Village-Funds Optimizing for Maternal and Child Health Program

A. Sriatmi, S. Jati, M. Martini, Syamsulhuda Budi Mustofa, B. Budiyono
{"title":"Stakeholder Perception of Health Resources and Village-Funds Optimizing for Maternal and Child Health Program","authors":"A. Sriatmi, S. Jati, M. Martini, Syamsulhuda Budi Mustofa, B. Budiyono","doi":"10.15294/kemas.v17i4.34334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The low support on cross-sectoral commitment of village stakeholders to health programs was one of factors contributed maternal and infant mortality in Tegal Regency. Although village funds have been rolled out since 2015, its implementation hadn’t been optimal due to orientation focus on infrastructure development. The study aims to analyze perceptions and attitudes of village stakeholders towards village level resources and optimizing village funds for MCH programs based on 3 groups stakeholder (Decision Maker, Provider and Clients-Representatives). It’s quantitative research, population of all village level stakeholders with 300 people as samples from 30 selected villages. Data collected with interview using questionnaire and being analyzed with frequency distribution and statistically using Kruskal-Wallis test. Most of three group stakeholders had good perception of their health resources and positive attitude towards MCH programs, but different results were seen for attitudes towards optimizing village funds. Decision Maker group and Clients-Representatives group showed tendency refusing, while Provider group tend to agree on village funds optimizing for MCH programs. Statistically, there were differences in attitudes towards optimizing village funds for MCH program between three groups. Attitude differences was mainly due to lack of understanding from external health stakeholders about health programs, especially village’s MCH program.","PeriodicalId":30682,"journal":{"name":"KEMAS Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEMAS Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v17i4.34334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The low support on cross-sectoral commitment of village stakeholders to health programs was one of factors contributed maternal and infant mortality in Tegal Regency. Although village funds have been rolled out since 2015, its implementation hadn’t been optimal due to orientation focus on infrastructure development. The study aims to analyze perceptions and attitudes of village stakeholders towards village level resources and optimizing village funds for MCH programs based on 3 groups stakeholder (Decision Maker, Provider and Clients-Representatives). It’s quantitative research, population of all village level stakeholders with 300 people as samples from 30 selected villages. Data collected with interview using questionnaire and being analyzed with frequency distribution and statistically using Kruskal-Wallis test. Most of three group stakeholders had good perception of their health resources and positive attitude towards MCH programs, but different results were seen for attitudes towards optimizing village funds. Decision Maker group and Clients-Representatives group showed tendency refusing, while Provider group tend to agree on village funds optimizing for MCH programs. Statistically, there were differences in attitudes towards optimizing village funds for MCH program between three groups. Attitude differences was mainly due to lack of understanding from external health stakeholders about health programs, especially village’s MCH program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对卫生资源和乡村资金优化妇幼保健项目的看法
村庄利益攸关方对保健方案跨部门承诺的支持度低是造成法政地区孕产妇和婴儿死亡率的因素之一。尽管自2015年以来已经推出了乡村基金,但由于其重点放在基础设施建设上,实施效果并不理想。本研究旨在分析基于3组利益相关者(决策者、提供者和客户代表)的村庄利益相关者对村级资源的看法和态度,并优化村庄妇幼保健项目的资金。这是一项定量研究,所有村级利益相关者的人口,从30个选定的村庄中抽取300人作为样本。采用问卷访谈法收集数据,采用频率分布法和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计分析。三个群体的利益相关者大多对自己的卫生资源有良好的认知,对妇幼保健项目有积极的态度,但对优化乡村资金的态度有不同的结果。决策者组和客户代表组倾向于拒绝,而提供者组倾向于同意农村资金优化妇幼保健项目。统计上,三组妇女对优化农村妇幼保健资金的态度存在差异。态度差异主要是由于外部卫生利益相关者对卫生项目,特别是村妇幼保健项目缺乏了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Stress Levels on the Eating Behavior of Elementary School Aged Children Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic Analysis of risk Factors for Commercial Sex Workers and the Prevalence of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) ASSESSMENT OF SELF-CARE ACTIVITIES USING DIABETES SELF- MANAGEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE IN DIABETES PATIENTS IN SURAKARTA Compliance with the COVID-19 Protocol for Pregnant Women in Pagelaran Characteristic Lesions of Chest X-ray as Predictor for Multi Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1