Evaluating pressure gauges as a potential future replacement for electromagnetic cable observations of the Florida Current transport at 27°N

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2020-06-16 DOI:10.1080/1755876X.2020.1780757
C. Meinen, Ryan H. Smith, Rigoberto F. García
{"title":"Evaluating pressure gauges as a potential future replacement for electromagnetic cable observations of the Florida Current transport at 27°N","authors":"C. Meinen, Ryan H. Smith, Rigoberto F. García","doi":"10.1080/1755876X.2020.1780757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For 30+ years, submarine cable voltage measurements have been a critical measurement system used to produce a highly valuable time series of daily Florida Current volume transport at 27°N in the Florida Straits. However, the high cost associated with replacing the measurement system, should the existing telecommunications cable break, represents a significant vulnerability to the continuation of this important transport time series. Six years of data from tide gauges near the ends of the cable at 27°N have been used to test the potential of a paired tide gauge system to replace the cable in the event of a future problem. Validations against the daily cable observations, and against snapshot transport estimates from ship sections, suggest that the tide gauges do represent a viable replacement, however, the accuracy of the transports determined from the tide gauges is lower than for the cable observations (2.7 Sv vs. 1.7 Sv, respectively). The tide gauges capture roughly 55% of the total variance observed by the cable. The correlation between the cable data and the tide gauge differences is fairly constant (r ≈ 0.75) after low-pass filtering the data at periods from 3 to 365 days, illustrating a lack of coherence sensitivity to those time scales.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2020.1780757","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT For 30+ years, submarine cable voltage measurements have been a critical measurement system used to produce a highly valuable time series of daily Florida Current volume transport at 27°N in the Florida Straits. However, the high cost associated with replacing the measurement system, should the existing telecommunications cable break, represents a significant vulnerability to the continuation of this important transport time series. Six years of data from tide gauges near the ends of the cable at 27°N have been used to test the potential of a paired tide gauge system to replace the cable in the event of a future problem. Validations against the daily cable observations, and against snapshot transport estimates from ship sections, suggest that the tide gauges do represent a viable replacement, however, the accuracy of the transports determined from the tide gauges is lower than for the cable observations (2.7 Sv vs. 1.7 Sv, respectively). The tide gauges capture roughly 55% of the total variance observed by the cable. The correlation between the cable data and the tide gauge differences is fairly constant (r ≈ 0.75) after low-pass filtering the data at periods from 3 to 365 days, illustrating a lack of coherence sensitivity to those time scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估压力表作为未来27°N佛罗里达洋流输送电磁电缆观测的潜在替代
30多年来,海底电缆电压测量一直是一个关键的测量系统,用于产生27°N佛罗里达海峡每日佛罗里达电流体积输送的非常有价值的时间序列。但是,如果现有的电信电缆断裂,更换测量系统的费用很高,这对这一重要的运输时间序列的继续是一个重大的弱点。在北纬27°电缆两端附近的潮汐测量仪收集了六年的数据,用于测试配对潮汐测量系统在未来出现问题时取代电缆的潜力。根据每日电缆观测和根据船段的快照传输估计进行验证,表明潮汐计确实是一种可行的替代方案,但是,潮汐计确定的传输精度低于电缆观测(分别为2.7 Sv和1.7 Sv)。潮汐计捕获了电缆观测到的总方差的大约55%。低通滤波后的数据周期为3 ~ 365天,电缆数据与验潮差之间的相关性相当恒定(r≈0.75),说明对这些时间尺度缺乏相干性敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1