Sildenafil Citrate Versus Nifedipine and Dydrogesreone in Prevention of Preterm Labor with Short Cervix

Abd El-Naser Abd El-Gaber Ali, Khaled M Abdallah, A. Abdelhamid
{"title":"Sildenafil Citrate Versus Nifedipine and Dydrogesreone in Prevention of Preterm Labor with Short Cervix","authors":"Abd El-Naser Abd El-Gaber Ali, Khaled M Abdallah, A. Abdelhamid","doi":"10.31579/2578-8965/009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prevention of the premature birth occurrence remains is considered one of the most tough challenges for obstetricians worldwide, mainly to avoid neonatal prematurity complications leading to short and long term morbidities additionally prematurity prevention will reduce premature neonatal mortality rates which is considered a major health concern of obstetricians, neonatologists and families. Objective: To compare and contrast the efficacy of Sildenafil citrate, Nifedipine and Dydrogesrone in prevention of premature labor in gestations with short cervix. Setting: Obstetrics & Gynecology Departments, Faculties of medicine, south Valley and Al-Azhar (Asyut) Universities, Egypt. Duration: from September 2014 to March 2018. Patients And Methds: the study was conducted on 300 pregnant women who randomly divided into three groups: Group I included 100 cases received Sildenafil citrate (Respatio tablet 20mg twice daily orally), Group II included 100 cases received Nifedipine (Epilat retard tablets 20mg twice daily orally) and Group III included 100 pregnant women received dydrogesreone 10 mg (Duphaston) twice daily orally. Results: incidence of preterm labor was (9.37, 8.51 and 14.28) in (Group I, Group II and Group II) respectively. Mean ± SD of cervical length at 32 weeks of gestation was mildly statistically significant among groups (p value <0.05) but no significance in neonatal outcome (p value >0.05) except birth weight which had a highly statistically significant difference (p value < 0.001). There was a highly statistically significant difference among studied groups as regard to drug side effects in (p value <0.001). Conclusion: Sildenafil citrate was as effective as Nifedipine and better than oral Dydrogesterone on myometrial relaxation and prevention of preterm birth in pregnant women who had short cervix.","PeriodicalId":19413,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Prevention of the premature birth occurrence remains is considered one of the most tough challenges for obstetricians worldwide, mainly to avoid neonatal prematurity complications leading to short and long term morbidities additionally prematurity prevention will reduce premature neonatal mortality rates which is considered a major health concern of obstetricians, neonatologists and families. Objective: To compare and contrast the efficacy of Sildenafil citrate, Nifedipine and Dydrogesrone in prevention of premature labor in gestations with short cervix. Setting: Obstetrics & Gynecology Departments, Faculties of medicine, south Valley and Al-Azhar (Asyut) Universities, Egypt. Duration: from September 2014 to March 2018. Patients And Methds: the study was conducted on 300 pregnant women who randomly divided into three groups: Group I included 100 cases received Sildenafil citrate (Respatio tablet 20mg twice daily orally), Group II included 100 cases received Nifedipine (Epilat retard tablets 20mg twice daily orally) and Group III included 100 pregnant women received dydrogesreone 10 mg (Duphaston) twice daily orally. Results: incidence of preterm labor was (9.37, 8.51 and 14.28) in (Group I, Group II and Group II) respectively. Mean ± SD of cervical length at 32 weeks of gestation was mildly statistically significant among groups (p value <0.05) but no significance in neonatal outcome (p value >0.05) except birth weight which had a highly statistically significant difference (p value < 0.001). There was a highly statistically significant difference among studied groups as regard to drug side effects in (p value <0.001). Conclusion: Sildenafil citrate was as effective as Nifedipine and better than oral Dydrogesterone on myometrial relaxation and prevention of preterm birth in pregnant women who had short cervix.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枸橼酸西地那非与硝苯地平、地屈孕酮预防短宫颈早产的比较
背景:预防早产仍然被认为是全世界产科医生面临的最严峻挑战之一,主要是为了避免新生儿早产并发症导致短期和长期发病率,此外,预防早产将降低早产儿死亡率,这被认为是产科医生、新生儿学家和家庭关注的主要健康问题。目的:比较枸橼酸西地那非、硝苯地平和地屈酮预防短宫颈妊娠早产的疗效。地点:埃及南谷大学和爱资哈尔(阿斯尤特)大学医学院妇产科。工作时间:2014年9月至2018年3月。患者与方法:将300例孕妇随机分为3组:1组100例给予枸橼酸西地那非(呼吸片20mg,每日2次口服),2组100例给予硝苯地平(Epilat迟缓片20mg,每日2次口服),3组100例给予地氢孕酮10mg (Duphaston),每日2次口服。结果:ⅰ组、ⅱ组、ⅱ组的早产发生率分别为9.37、8.51、14.28。各组妊娠32周宫颈长度均值±SD差异有轻度统计学意义(p值0.05),但出生体重差异有高度统计学意义(p值< 0.001)。在药物副作用方面,研究组之间的差异具有高度统计学意义(p值<0.001)。结论:枸橼酸西地那非对短宫颈孕妇子宫肌层松弛及预防早产的效果与硝苯地平相当,优于口服地屈孕酮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of In-vitro Fertilization Procedures on Alpha-fetoprotein Levels in Second Trimester Screening for Fetal Defects Medical Management of Uterine Fibroids-A hope for Fertile Women! Evaluation of Antithrombin-III Activity and Platelet Count in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension among Pregnant Women attending Antenatal care in a Tertiary Health Facility in Southeast, Nigeria Male Infertility – An Overview of Management Comparison of Two Types of Endometrial Scratch before Embryo Transfer and Patient-Reported Pain Scores: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1