Toward a Structural Model of Organizational-Level Institutional Pluralism and Logic Interconnectedness

Dennis Jancsary, Renate E. Meyer, Markus A. Höllerer, V. Barberio
{"title":"Toward a Structural Model of Organizational-Level Institutional Pluralism and Logic Interconnectedness","authors":"Dennis Jancsary, Renate E. Meyer, Markus A. Höllerer, V. Barberio","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we develop a structural model for studying how constellations of multiple institutional logics are instantiated at the organizational level. Conceptually, we complement an institutional logics perspective with structural interactionism and network theory and model a constellation as a nexus of organizational role identities and counterroles. The structure of such a nexus reveals degrees of differentiation and interconnectedness between logics as well as distinct interfaces. We validate and further develop our model through qualitative content analysis and semantic network analytical methods applied to the website of a large organization. Our study contributes to recent literature on institutional pluralism by further specifying the structural aspects of constellations of logics and different types of institutional pluralism (monolithic, fragmented, and modular). Specifically, we show how systems of role categories enable the identification of logics, and how multivocal roles create interf...","PeriodicalId":93599,"journal":{"name":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","volume":"293 1","pages":"1150-1167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

In this article, we develop a structural model for studying how constellations of multiple institutional logics are instantiated at the organizational level. Conceptually, we complement an institutional logics perspective with structural interactionism and network theory and model a constellation as a nexus of organizational role identities and counterroles. The structure of such a nexus reveals degrees of differentiation and interconnectedness between logics as well as distinct interfaces. We validate and further develop our model through qualitative content analysis and semantic network analytical methods applied to the website of a large organization. Our study contributes to recent literature on institutional pluralism by further specifying the structural aspects of constellations of logics and different types of institutional pluralism (monolithic, fragmented, and modular). Specifically, we show how systems of role categories enable the identification of logics, and how multivocal roles create interf...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论组织层面的制度多元化与逻辑互联性的结构模型
在本文中,我们开发了一个结构模型,用于研究如何在组织层面实例化多个制度逻辑的星座。在概念上,我们用结构互动主义和网络理论补充了制度逻辑的观点,并将星座模型作为组织角色认同和反角色的联系。这种联系的结构揭示了逻辑之间的分化和相互联系的程度,以及不同的接口。我们通过应用于大型组织网站的定性内容分析和语义网络分析方法来验证和进一步发展我们的模型。我们的研究通过进一步明确逻辑星座的结构方面和不同类型的制度多元主义(整体、碎片化和模块化),为最近关于制度多元主义的文献做出了贡献。具体来说,我们展示了角色类别系统如何能够识别逻辑,以及多声音角色如何创建接口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees' Problem Solving Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory The Lasting Benefits of Teams: Tie Vitality After Teams Disband Falling Not Far from the Tree: Entrepreneurs and Organizational Heritage Blurred Lines: How the Collectivism Norm Operates Through Perceived Group Diversity to Boost or Harm Group Performance in Himalayan Mountain Climbing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1