Scotland's public libraries are nothing but practical when it comes to deselection

IF 0.1 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-11 DOI:10.29173/lirg795
Kath Rowley, Rebekah Willson
{"title":"Scotland's public libraries are nothing but practical when it comes to deselection","authors":"Kath Rowley, Rebekah Willson","doi":"10.29173/lirg795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is based on results from qualitative research into Scotland’s public libraries collection development practices and the thoughts of library staff in regards to deselection (referred to in this paper as weeding). An open-text online survey promoted through professional newsletters, word of month, and social media, solicited rich, personal input from practicing library staff on the role, practice, and future of deselection in public libraries. From 36 responses, three main themes were developed: public perception, the role of governance, and continunity concerns. With pressure to provide the latest technology and published works for users, all in safe, usable spaces, Scotland’s libraries are weeding to remain relevant and responsive. Governance structures controlled policy and implementation of weeding practices, with respondents from Scottish public libraries overwhelming weeding via stock exchanges or with assistance from library headquarter teams/professional staff. The larger concern for collection development staff was having the budget, time and staff to make weeding a continuous, efficient process.  ","PeriodicalId":41898,"journal":{"name":"Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal","volume":"254 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is based on results from qualitative research into Scotland’s public libraries collection development practices and the thoughts of library staff in regards to deselection (referred to in this paper as weeding). An open-text online survey promoted through professional newsletters, word of month, and social media, solicited rich, personal input from practicing library staff on the role, practice, and future of deselection in public libraries. From 36 responses, three main themes were developed: public perception, the role of governance, and continunity concerns. With pressure to provide the latest technology and published works for users, all in safe, usable spaces, Scotland’s libraries are weeding to remain relevant and responsive. Governance structures controlled policy and implementation of weeding practices, with respondents from Scottish public libraries overwhelming weeding via stock exchanges or with assistance from library headquarter teams/professional staff. The larger concern for collection development staff was having the budget, time and staff to make weeding a continuous, efficient process.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当涉及到取消选举时,苏格兰的公共图书馆非常实用
本文是基于对苏格兰公共图书馆馆藏发展实践和图书馆工作人员关于去选择(本文中称为除草)的想法的定性研究结果。一项开放文本在线调查通过专业通讯、月度词汇和社交媒体进行推广,向图书馆从业人员征求关于公共图书馆取消选举的作用、做法和未来的丰富个人意见。从36个回应中,我们得出了三个主题:公众认知、治理的作用和对连续性的关注。在为用户提供最新技术和出版作品的压力下,所有这些都在安全、可用的空间里,苏格兰的图书馆正在努力保持相关性和响应性。治理结构控制着政策和除草实践的实施,苏格兰公共图书馆的受访者通过证券交易所或在图书馆总部团队/专业人员的协助下,压倒性地进行了除草。收集开发人员更关心的是,是否有预算、时间和人员使除草成为一个持续、有效的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: LIBRES is an international refereed electronic journal devoted to new research in Library and Information Science. Libres is distributed through a listserver, and an ftp site. Listserver subscribers are notified of new issues through the distribution of a table of contents to LIBRES, LIBREF-L, and any other e-conferences requesting the service.
期刊最新文献
Peer-led literacy: a prison library’s collaboration with the Shannon Trust Beyond the search process: Exploring the affective stages in developing a research proposal A reach/significance cross-over: a strategy for demonstrating the impact of our research Blended professionals: the problem of legitimacy for UK librarians as teachers in Higher Education Scotland's public libraries are nothing but practical when it comes to deselection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1