Assessment of Port-Specific Pain After Gynecological Laparoscopy: A Prospective Cohort Clinical Trial.

Qianqian Wang, Lu Huang, Wenjie Zeng, Lifeng Chen, Xiaofeng Zhao
{"title":"Assessment of Port-Specific Pain After Gynecological Laparoscopy: A Prospective Cohort Clinical Trial.","authors":"Qianqian Wang, Lu Huang, Wenjie Zeng, Lifeng Chen, Xiaofeng Zhao","doi":"10.1089/lap.2016.0340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the association between pain related to laparoscopic port sites and different incision sizes after gynecological laparoscopy.\n\n\nDESIGN\nProspective, cohort trial Canadian Task Force classification 2-II.\n\n\nSETTING\nZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, China.\n\n\nPATIENTS\nTwo hundred patients who underwent three-port laparoscopic gynecological procedures for benign indications.\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nIn total, 200 patients underwent laparoscopic gynecological procedures. Each patient had three incisions, one in the left lower abdomen, measuring 5, 10, or 15 mm based on the type of surgery, another measuring 10 mm in the umbilical port, and the third one measuring 5 mm, in the right lower abdomen. Port-related pain was registered and measured by visual analogue score (VAS).\n\n\nMEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS\nThe VAS score showed statistically significant differences between 5-, 10-, and 15-mm port sites at each time point (24 and 72 hours) (P < .05); the score elevated as the size of the incision increased. Pain was significantly lower at the umbilical port sites at 24 hours than in the left lower abdominal port sites with incisions of the same (10 mm) size (P = .013) and also significantly lower in the right lower abdominal port sites than in the left lower abdominal port sites with incisions of the same (5 mm) size (P = .041). Specimen extraction port significantly affected the 24-hour pain intensity, while specimen extraction port, surgical time, and previous abdominal surgery affected the 72-hour pain intensity.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe size of port sites is the most important factor related to port-specific pain.","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the association between pain related to laparoscopic port sites and different incision sizes after gynecological laparoscopy. DESIGN Prospective, cohort trial Canadian Task Force classification 2-II. SETTING Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, China. PATIENTS Two hundred patients who underwent three-port laparoscopic gynecological procedures for benign indications. INTERVENTIONS In total, 200 patients underwent laparoscopic gynecological procedures. Each patient had three incisions, one in the left lower abdomen, measuring 5, 10, or 15 mm based on the type of surgery, another measuring 10 mm in the umbilical port, and the third one measuring 5 mm, in the right lower abdomen. Port-related pain was registered and measured by visual analogue score (VAS). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The VAS score showed statistically significant differences between 5-, 10-, and 15-mm port sites at each time point (24 and 72 hours) (P < .05); the score elevated as the size of the incision increased. Pain was significantly lower at the umbilical port sites at 24 hours than in the left lower abdominal port sites with incisions of the same (10 mm) size (P = .013) and also significantly lower in the right lower abdominal port sites than in the left lower abdominal port sites with incisions of the same (5 mm) size (P = .041). Specimen extraction port significantly affected the 24-hour pain intensity, while specimen extraction port, surgical time, and previous abdominal surgery affected the 72-hour pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS The size of port sites is the most important factor related to port-specific pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估妇科腹腔镜术后端口特异性疼痛:一项前瞻性队列临床试验。
目的探讨妇科腹腔镜术后不同切口大小与腹腔镜口部疼痛的关系。前瞻性队列试验加拿大特遣部队分类2-II。单位:浙江省人民医院病人200名接受三孔腹腔镜妇科手术的良性指征的病人。干预总共有200名患者接受了腹腔镜妇科手术。每位患者有三个切口,一个在左下腹,根据手术类型分别为5、10或15毫米,另一个在脐口,10毫米,第三个在右下腹,5毫米。采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score, VAS)对左端相关疼痛进行记录和测量。VAS评分在每个时间点(24和72小时)5、10和15 mm端口位点之间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);随着切口大小的增加,评分也随之升高。24小时时,脐口部位的疼痛明显低于切口相同(10 mm)的左侧下腹口部位(P = 0.013),右侧下腹口部位的疼痛也明显低于切口相同(5 mm)的左侧下腹口部位(P = 0.041)。取标本口对24小时疼痛强度有显著影响,取标本口、手术时间、既往腹部手术对72小时疼痛强度有显著影响。结论端口部位的大小是影响端口特异性疼痛的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of External Distractions on Simulated Laparoscopic Performance. Commentary: Innovations in the Management of Lung Cancer. Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, after Percutaneous Gall Bladder Drainage, for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis TG18 in Patients with Concomitant Cardiopulmonary Disease. Initial Experience with Disposable Single-Use Cholangioscope During Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration. Telescopic Dissection as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Balloon Trocar for Preperitoneal Dissection in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1