Muslim minorities and bank loans between interest and necessity: الأقليات المسلمة والقروض المصرفية بين المصلحة والضرورة

Asmaa Fathy Abdel Azeez Shehata Asmaa Fathy Abdel Azeez Shehata
{"title":"Muslim minorities and bank loans between interest and necessity: الأقليات المسلمة والقروض المصرفية بين المصلحة والضرورة","authors":"Asmaa Fathy Abdel Azeez Shehata Asmaa Fathy Abdel Azeez Shehata","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.g161121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aimed at clarify the ruling on Muslim minorities dealing with banks through loans, and to determine the nature of the interest that accrues to them, and the extent to which necessity is considered or not in this issue.  The research method is represented in the deductive approach, by comparing the approved schools of jurisprudence, discussing the difference between them, and clarifying the most correct ones. The research concludes with several results, the most important of which are: that Muslim minorities represent a group of people who share the religiosity of Islam, and live in a society in which non-Islamic laws are applied and are less in number than the majority in that society that does not owe this religion, and that lending and bank borrowing with interest are prohibited by Sharia; because they involve usury, and that dealing with Muslim minorities with bank loans is not permissible if they are in a state of capacity and choice, while it is permissible for them temporarily in the case of necessity only if the halal doors are closed in their faces, and with specific restrictions. The expected interest from dealing in usury with regard to those with high incomes among the Muslim minorities is considered an illusory interest, and it is in the right of those in need among them if other permissible ways to achieve it are found, and that the considered necessity is the real necessity that is in the basic matters of life, and it is a permission for Muslim minorities in individual cases only, and does not include matters that are in excess of what life does.","PeriodicalId":17009,"journal":{"name":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.g161121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research aimed at clarify the ruling on Muslim minorities dealing with banks through loans, and to determine the nature of the interest that accrues to them, and the extent to which necessity is considered or not in this issue.  The research method is represented in the deductive approach, by comparing the approved schools of jurisprudence, discussing the difference between them, and clarifying the most correct ones. The research concludes with several results, the most important of which are: that Muslim minorities represent a group of people who share the religiosity of Islam, and live in a society in which non-Islamic laws are applied and are less in number than the majority in that society that does not owe this religion, and that lending and bank borrowing with interest are prohibited by Sharia; because they involve usury, and that dealing with Muslim minorities with bank loans is not permissible if they are in a state of capacity and choice, while it is permissible for them temporarily in the case of necessity only if the halal doors are closed in their faces, and with specific restrictions. The expected interest from dealing in usury with regard to those with high incomes among the Muslim minorities is considered an illusory interest, and it is in the right of those in need among them if other permissible ways to achieve it are found, and that the considered necessity is the real necessity that is in the basic matters of life, and it is a permission for Muslim minorities in individual cases only, and does not include matters that are in excess of what life does.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穆斯林少数民族之间和银行贷款利息和必要性:الأقلياتالمسلمةوالقروضالمصرفيةبينالمصلحةوالضرورة
本研究旨在澄清穆斯林少数民族通过贷款与银行打交道的裁决,并确定他们所产生的利息的性质,以及在这个问题上考虑必要性的程度。研究方法以演绎法为代表,通过比较公认的法理学流派,讨论它们之间的差异,并澄清最正确的方法。这项研究得出了几个结论,其中最重要的是:穆斯林少数民族代表了一群信奉伊斯兰教的人,他们生活在一个适用非伊斯兰法律的社会中,人数少于该社会中不信奉伊斯兰教的多数人;伊斯兰教法禁止贷款和银行有息借款;因为它们涉及高利贷,如果穆斯林少数民族有能力和选择的情况下,银行贷款是不允许的,而在必要的情况下,只有在清真之门在他们面前关闭并有具体限制的情况下,才允许他们暂时获得银行贷款。预期的兴趣从事高利贷对那些高收入的穆斯林少数民族被认为是一个虚幻的兴趣,并在其中那些有需要的人的权利如果找到其他允许的方法来实现它,并且认为需要是真正的必要性,在生活的基本问题,这是一个允许穆斯林少数民族只在个别情况下,和不包括重要超过什么生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The method of Imam Al-Damiry (D. 808 AH) in Al-Jarh and Al-Ta’deel through his book Al-Najm Al-Wahaj fi explain Al-Minhaj ما يُخْرَجُ مِنْ رَأْسِ المَالِ، وما يُخْرَجُ مِنْ الثُّلُثِ ضوابط العمارة في القرآن الكريم الإمام إسماعيل بن القاسم ومخطوطه (مسألة طلاق الدور): دراسة وتحقيق ابن مظفر اليمني وكتابه الكواكب النيرة (دراسة وتحقيق بابي الرجعة والاختلاف)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1