Second-trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Pulsatility Index in Singleton Pregnant Women with and without Risk of Pre-eclampsia

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Women s Health Reviews Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.2174/1573404820666230823153426
K. Shojaei, Shima Elahian, N. Saadati, R. Jafari, M. M. Gharibvand, M. Seyedtabib, Shooka Mohammadi
{"title":"Second-trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Pulsatility Index in Singleton Pregnant Women with and without Risk of Pre-eclampsia","authors":"K. Shojaei, Shima Elahian, N. Saadati, R. Jafari, M. M. Gharibvand, M. Seyedtabib, Shooka Mohammadi","doi":"10.2174/1573404820666230823153426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nPreeclampsia (PE) is gestational hypertension and one of the most serious disorders in pregnant women.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to compare second-trimester uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index (UA-PI) in singleton pregnant women with and without risk of PE.\n\n\n\nA case-control study was carried out among 200 singleton pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy, who were referred to Imam Hospital in Ahvaz (Iran). The data were recorded on their demographic, obstetric, clinical characteristics, and Doppler indices. The average UA-PI value was considered as the mean PI between the right and left arteries. Women who were categorized into Groups 1 and 2 had a moderate-high and low risk of PE, respectively.\n\n\n\nThe mean UA-PI, right UA-PI, left UA-PI, systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP), age, body mass index (BMI), and abdominal circumference (AC) of women in Group 1 were significantly higher than those in Group 2 \n(p<0.05). Furthermore, Group 1 had a higher frequency of abortions, comorbidities, abnormal UA Doppler results, and nulliparous \nwomen than Group 2 (p<0.05). Based on maternal age (<35, ≥35), BMI (<25, ≥25), comorbidities (yes, no), and nulliparity (yes, no) \ncategories, those who were in Group 1 had a significantly higher mean systolic and diastolic BP, UA-PI, right UA-PI, and left UA-PI than \ntheir counterparts in Group 2 (P<0.001).\n\n\n\nThis study declared the second-trimester UA-PI had good potential for timely prediction of PE risk in pregnant women.\n","PeriodicalId":11030,"journal":{"name":"Current Women s Health Reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Women s Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230823153426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is gestational hypertension and one of the most serious disorders in pregnant women. This study aimed to compare second-trimester uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index (UA-PI) in singleton pregnant women with and without risk of PE. A case-control study was carried out among 200 singleton pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy, who were referred to Imam Hospital in Ahvaz (Iran). The data were recorded on their demographic, obstetric, clinical characteristics, and Doppler indices. The average UA-PI value was considered as the mean PI between the right and left arteries. Women who were categorized into Groups 1 and 2 had a moderate-high and low risk of PE, respectively. The mean UA-PI, right UA-PI, left UA-PI, systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP), age, body mass index (BMI), and abdominal circumference (AC) of women in Group 1 were significantly higher than those in Group 2 (p<0.05). Furthermore, Group 1 had a higher frequency of abortions, comorbidities, abnormal UA Doppler results, and nulliparous women than Group 2 (p<0.05). Based on maternal age (<35, ≥35), BMI (<25, ≥25), comorbidities (yes, no), and nulliparity (yes, no) categories, those who were in Group 1 had a significantly higher mean systolic and diastolic BP, UA-PI, right UA-PI, and left UA-PI than their counterparts in Group 2 (P<0.001). This study declared the second-trimester UA-PI had good potential for timely prediction of PE risk in pregnant women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有和无先兆子痫风险的单胎妊娠中期子宫动脉多普勒脉搏指数
先兆子痫(PE)是妊娠期高血压,是孕妇最严重的疾病之一。本研究旨在比较有和无PE风险的单胎孕妇妊娠中期子宫动脉多普勒脉搏指数(UA-PI)。对200名妊娠中期的单胎孕妇进行了病例对照研究,这些孕妇被转诊到阿瓦士(伊朗)的伊玛目医院。记录患者的人口学、产科、临床特征和多普勒指数。平均UA-PI值作为左右动脉之间的平均PI值。被分为第一组和第二组的女性分别有中高和低的PE风险。1组妇女的平均UA-PI、右UA-PI、左UA-PI、收缩压、舒张压、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、腹围(AC)均显著高于2组(p<0.05)。此外,1组流产、合并症、UA多普勒异常、无产妇女的发生率均高于2组(p<0.05)。根据产妇年龄(<35、≥35)、BMI(<25、≥25)、合并症(有、无)和无产(有、无)分类,1组患者的平均收缩压和舒张压、UA-PI、右侧UA-PI和左侧UA-PI明显高于2组(P<0.001)。本研究表明,妊娠中期UA-PI在及时预测孕妇PE风险方面具有良好的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Women s Health Reviews
Current Women s Health Reviews OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Current Women"s Health Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on obstetrics and gynecology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms with Herbal Medicines: A Review Menstrual Cup Awareness and Future Usage Possibilities of Consumers: A Cross-sectional Study Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Scratching in Follicular and Luteal Phases in Pregnancy Rate of Frozen Embryo Transfer Candidate Women Marital Satisfaction in Postpartum Women: The Role of Personality, Body Image Satisfaction, Anxiety, and Sexual Function A Complex Condition; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Review of its Recent Advanced Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1