«Post-truth» in Social Reality: Risks and Threats

I. S. Sushpanova
{"title":"«Post-truth» in Social Reality: Risks and Threats","authors":"I. S. Sushpanova","doi":"10.31857/S013216250003173-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current post-truth culture, the problem of reliable reflection of socio-political reality in the public consciousness is topical. Widespread dissemination of false, fake news is a threat to society and democracy. The term «post-truth» is ambiguously defined in scientific, journalistic circles, among politicians and public figures. The post-truth politics is reflected in the international arena, in conflicts between countries, as well as at the regional level in the battle for the votes. The post-truth culture spreads widely on the Internet, creating a non-alternative personalized «world of truth» for the user. Fake news is gradually becoming a source of concern for the authorities of many states, threatening their internal security and destabilizing international democratic order. Average citizen might hardly tell false information from truth. Information can undermine public trust of citizens and cause widespread protest activity against authorities and democratic values, discrediting both professional journalists, politicians, and the power structures. The fight against false sources of information in the electronic and digital field is gaining momentum. In order to prevent the spread of the post-truth culture, a number of countries have chosen a strategy for strengthening censorship and introducing control over information posted in various media. This way can lead to infringement on civic rights and freedoms, threat to democracy and emergence of authoritarian regimes. Another strategy is to consolidate efforts of civil society, state, means and sources of information dissemination and companies engaged in digital technologies. This – in sum – contributes to the fight against the post-truth culture.","PeriodicalId":85741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of sociological studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"94-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of sociological studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250003173-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the current post-truth culture, the problem of reliable reflection of socio-political reality in the public consciousness is topical. Widespread dissemination of false, fake news is a threat to society and democracy. The term «post-truth» is ambiguously defined in scientific, journalistic circles, among politicians and public figures. The post-truth politics is reflected in the international arena, in conflicts between countries, as well as at the regional level in the battle for the votes. The post-truth culture spreads widely on the Internet, creating a non-alternative personalized «world of truth» for the user. Fake news is gradually becoming a source of concern for the authorities of many states, threatening their internal security and destabilizing international democratic order. Average citizen might hardly tell false information from truth. Information can undermine public trust of citizens and cause widespread protest activity against authorities and democratic values, discrediting both professional journalists, politicians, and the power structures. The fight against false sources of information in the electronic and digital field is gaining momentum. In order to prevent the spread of the post-truth culture, a number of countries have chosen a strategy for strengthening censorship and introducing control over information posted in various media. This way can lead to infringement on civic rights and freedoms, threat to democracy and emergence of authoritarian regimes. Another strategy is to consolidate efforts of civil society, state, means and sources of information dissemination and companies engaged in digital technologies. This – in sum – contributes to the fight against the post-truth culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会现实中的“后真相”:风险与威胁
在当前的后真相文化中,在公众意识中可靠地反映社会政治现实的问题是一个热门话题。虚假新闻的广泛传播是对社会和民主的威胁。“后真相”一词在科学界、新闻界、政治家和公众人物中定义模糊。后真相政治既体现在国际舞台上,也体现在国家间的冲突中,也体现在地区层面的选票争夺中。后真相文化在互联网上广泛传播,为用户创造了一个不可替代的个性化“真相世界”。假新闻正逐渐成为许多国家当局关注的问题,威胁着他们的内部安全,破坏了国际民主秩序。一般公民很难分辨真假。信息会破坏公众对公民的信任,引发针对当局和民主价值观的广泛抗议活动,使专业记者、政治家和权力结构失去信誉。在电子和数字领域,打击虚假信息来源的斗争势头正在增强。为了防止后真相文化的传播,一些国家选择了加强审查和对各种媒体发布的信息进行控制的策略。这种方式可能导致侵犯公民权利和自由,威胁民主主义,出现独裁政权。另一项战略是巩固民间社会、国家、信息传播手段和来源以及从事数字技术的公司的努力。总而言之,这有助于对抗后真相文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Оккультизм в сознании горожан Казахстана Опыт перехода российских компаний на удалённую работу в ситуации пандемии The Elderly and Physical Activity: A Qualitative Method The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Balancing between Culturalism and Scientism Sociology and Military Studies: Broadening the Perspective, Using the Classics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1