The European Convention on Human Rights and the Lithuanian Constitutional Court: the echr’s Formal Status, Impact and Interaction Between the Court and the ECtHR

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW Review of Central and East European Law Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1163/15730352-bja10081
Karolina Bubnytė-Širmenė
{"title":"The European Convention on Human Rights and the Lithuanian Constitutional Court: the echr’s Formal Status, Impact and Interaction Between the Court and the ECtHR","authors":"Karolina Bubnytė-Širmenė","doi":"10.1163/15730352-bja10081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article explores the attitude of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court to the European Convention on Human Rights, revealing its evolution from the establishment of the Court in 1993 until today. It is assumed that the most significant impact of the Convention was perceived in earlier constitutional jurisprudence, while its increased quality and quantity brought changes in the Court’s attitude to the Convention, also influencing its relationship with the European Court of Human Rights. The author undertakes the following tasks: 1) to define the formal legal status of the Convention within the Lithuanian legal system; 2) to reveal the impact of the Convention on Lithuanian constitutional jurisprudence and to identify related changes; 3) to discuss the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights as it has evolved and 4) to find out whether there is room for domestic development of the rights guaranteed under the Convention and how this manifests.","PeriodicalId":42845,"journal":{"name":"Review of Central and East European Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Central and East European Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores the attitude of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court to the European Convention on Human Rights, revealing its evolution from the establishment of the Court in 1993 until today. It is assumed that the most significant impact of the Convention was perceived in earlier constitutional jurisprudence, while its increased quality and quantity brought changes in the Court’s attitude to the Convention, also influencing its relationship with the European Court of Human Rights. The author undertakes the following tasks: 1) to define the formal legal status of the Convention within the Lithuanian legal system; 2) to reveal the impact of the Convention on Lithuanian constitutional jurisprudence and to identify related changes; 3) to discuss the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights as it has evolved and 4) to find out whether there is room for domestic development of the rights guaranteed under the Convention and how this manifests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《欧洲人权公约》与立陶宛宪法法院:欧洲人权法院的正式地位、影响和法院与欧洲人权法院之间的相互作用》
本文探讨了立陶宛宪法法院对《欧洲人权公约》的态度,揭示了立陶宛宪法法院自1993年成立至今的演变。人们认为,《公约》最重要的影响体现在早期的宪法判例中,而其质量和数量的增加改变了法院对《公约》的态度,也影响了法院与欧洲人权法院的关系。作者承担了以下任务:1)确定《公约》在立陶宛法律体系中的正式法律地位;2)揭示《公约》对立陶宛宪法学的影响,并识别相关变化;3)讨论宪法法院与欧洲人权法院之间的关系演变;4)查明国内是否有发展《公约》所保障的权利的空间,以及这种空间如何体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Review of Central and East European Law critically examines issues of legal doctrine and practice in the CIS and CEE regions. An important aspect of this is, for example, the harmonization of legal principles and rules; another facet is the legal impact of the intertwining of domestic economies, on the one hand, with regional economies and the processes of international trade and investment on the other. The Review offers a forum for discussion of topical questions of public and private law. The Review encourages comparative research; it is hoped that, in this way, additional insights in legal developments can be communicated to those interested in questions, not only of law, but also of politics, economics, and of society of the CIS and CEE countries.
期刊最新文献
Is Transparency Enough? Informal Governance Networks and the Selection Process of a Georgian Judge to the European Court of Human Rights Validity of Jurisdiction Clauses in Standard Terms and Conditions of International Commercial Contracts under Turkish Law Multiplication of Extraordinary Appeal Measures in Polish Criminal Proceedings: A Guarantee of Justice or Erosion of the Principle of Legal Certainty? Balancing Initial Copyright Ownership in Czech and Slovak Private International Law Accented Universality: Exploring Accountability as a Non-Translatable Concept in Central Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1