Comparing and contrasting two United Nations Environment Programme reports on COVID-19

Colin David Butler
{"title":"Comparing and contrasting two United Nations Environment Programme reports on COVID-19","authors":"Colin David Butler","doi":"10.1016/j.soh.2022.100003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In 2022 a report was published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) into the causes and implications of the pandemic. This adds to an earlier UNEP report into the pandemic. Each of these reports identifies a small number of important drivers for zoonotic emergence. While the two reports substantially agree, there are also some divergences, the discussion of which is the main purpose of this letter. Each report agrees that the farming of livestock to supply meat and other animal products is an underlying driver of potential zoonotic spillover. The chief difference between these reports, with regard to this aspect, concerns the word “protein”. The other important difference is that the later report identifies a potential role of laboratory and medical procedures contributing to zoonotic outbreaks and even to pandemics. Each of these differences are described. The letter concludes by discussing a recent WHO report that also warns of the risk of viral manipulation, and argues that this is an emerging topic relevant to One Health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101146,"journal":{"name":"Science in One Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704322000038/pdfft?md5=024595686eee141744269206733ab430&pid=1-s2.0-S2949704322000038-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704322000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2022 a report was published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) into the causes and implications of the pandemic. This adds to an earlier UNEP report into the pandemic. Each of these reports identifies a small number of important drivers for zoonotic emergence. While the two reports substantially agree, there are also some divergences, the discussion of which is the main purpose of this letter. Each report agrees that the farming of livestock to supply meat and other animal products is an underlying driver of potential zoonotic spillover. The chief difference between these reports, with regard to this aspect, concerns the word “protein”. The other important difference is that the later report identifies a potential role of laboratory and medical procedures contributing to zoonotic outbreaks and even to pandemics. Each of these differences are described. The letter concludes by discussing a recent WHO report that also warns of the risk of viral manipulation, and argues that this is an emerging topic relevant to One Health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较和对比联合国环境规划署关于COVID-19的两份报告
2022年,联合国环境规划署(环境署)发表了一份报告,探讨了这一流行病的原因和影响。这是对联合国环境规划署早些时候关于这一流行病的报告的补充。每一份报告都指出了导致人畜共患疾病出现的少数重要驱动因素。虽然这两份报告大体上一致,但也有一些分歧,讨论这些分歧是本函的主要目的。每一份报告都一致认为,为供应肉类和其他动物产品而养殖牲畜是潜在的人畜共患病溢出效应的潜在驱动因素。在这方面,这些报告的主要区别在于“蛋白质”一词。另一个重要区别是,后一份报告确定了实验室和医疗程序对人畜共患病暴发甚至大流行的潜在作用。本文描述了每一种差异。这封信最后讨论了世卫组织最近的一份报告,该报告也警告了病毒操纵的风险,并认为这是一个与“同一个健康”相关的新兴话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern technologies and solutions to enhance surveillance and response systems for emerging zoonotic diseases Dietary exposure assessment of perchlorate and chlorate in infant formulas marketed in Shanghai, China Irrational use of colistin sulfate in poultry and domestic animals in Nepal-an emerging public health crisis How far has the globe gone in achieving One Health? Current evidence and policy implications based on global One Health index Microbiome One Health model for a healthy ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1