Effectiveness of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control and Impulsivity in Nicotine-dependent Individuals

Seyyed AbdolKarim Ghasemi, A. G. Chamanabad, Seyyed Rouhollah Hosseini, AmirMohammad Mahdinia, Zohreh Teymori, Sajjad Abbaszade
{"title":"Effectiveness of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control and Impulsivity in Nicotine-dependent Individuals","authors":"Seyyed AbdolKarim Ghasemi, A. G. Chamanabad, Seyyed Rouhollah Hosseini, AmirMohammad Mahdinia, Zohreh Teymori, Sajjad Abbaszade","doi":"10.32598/jgums.32.2.1977.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Technology-based interventions, such as electrical brain stimulation may be effective in the cognitive and personality processes of substance abusers, including nicotine dependents. Objective We conducted this study to investigate the effectiveness of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) using alpha frequency on inhibitory control and impulsivity in nicotine-dependent individuals. Methods We used a pre-test/post-test/follow-up quasi-experimental design with control and sham groups. We selected 30 eligible nicotine addicts from Mashhad using the available sampling method and randomly divided the subjects into three groups. We applied the intervention in eight sessions for 20 minutes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for the first group, fake interventions for the second group, and no intervention for the third group. The Fagerström questionnaire, Barrett impulsivity questionnaire, and go-no-go task were used to collect data. After eight sessions, people’s inhibitory control and impulsivity were evaluated and analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). Also, after two months, we evaluated inhibitory control data with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results The effectiveness of alpha-tACS intervention on short- and long-term inhibitory control was significantly different in the experimental group compared to other groups (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between these three groups in impulsivity (P=0.700). Conclusion Alpha-tACS intervention effectively increases inhibitory control in nicotine-dependent individuals but does not explicitly affect their impulsivity.","PeriodicalId":15994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jgums.32.2.1977.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Technology-based interventions, such as electrical brain stimulation may be effective in the cognitive and personality processes of substance abusers, including nicotine dependents. Objective We conducted this study to investigate the effectiveness of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) using alpha frequency on inhibitory control and impulsivity in nicotine-dependent individuals. Methods We used a pre-test/post-test/follow-up quasi-experimental design with control and sham groups. We selected 30 eligible nicotine addicts from Mashhad using the available sampling method and randomly divided the subjects into three groups. We applied the intervention in eight sessions for 20 minutes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for the first group, fake interventions for the second group, and no intervention for the third group. The Fagerström questionnaire, Barrett impulsivity questionnaire, and go-no-go task were used to collect data. After eight sessions, people’s inhibitory control and impulsivity were evaluated and analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). Also, after two months, we evaluated inhibitory control data with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results The effectiveness of alpha-tACS intervention on short- and long-term inhibitory control was significantly different in the experimental group compared to other groups (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between these three groups in impulsivity (P=0.700). Conclusion Alpha-tACS intervention effectively increases inhibitory control in nicotine-dependent individuals but does not explicitly affect their impulsivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅交流电刺激对尼古丁依赖个体抑制控制和冲动性的影响
以技术为基础的干预措施,如脑电刺激,可能对药物滥用者(包括尼古丁依赖者)的认知和人格过程有效。目的探讨经颅高频交流电刺激(tACS)对尼古丁依赖个体的抑制控制和冲动性的影响。方法采用前测/后测/随访准实验设计,分为对照组和假手术组。我们采用现有的抽样方法从马什哈德选取了30名符合条件的尼古丁成瘾者,并将受试者随机分为三组。我们对第一组的背外侧前额叶皮层进行了8次干预,每次20分钟,第二组进行了假干预,第三组不进行干预。采用Fagerström问卷、Barrett冲动性问卷和go-no-go任务进行数据收集。8个疗程后,采用多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)对受试者的抑制控制和冲动性进行评估和分析。此外,两个月后,我们用重复测量方差分析评估抑制控制数据。结果实验组α - tacs干预对短期和长期抑制控制的效果与其他组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。三组间冲动性差异无统计学意义(P=0.700)。结论α - tacs干预可有效增强尼古丁依赖个体的抑制控制,但对其冲动行为无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Antidepressant and Antioxidant Activity of the Alcoholic Extract of Melilotus Officinalis L. in Male Rats The Frequency of Septal Abscess and Underlying Factors in Affected Patients in a Referral Hospital in North of Iran The Potential of Tissue Engineering in Treatment of Female Reproductive System Disorders: A Review Professional Autonomy and Safe Nursing Care in Newly Graduated Nurses Working in Emergency Departments Investigation of Microbial Contamination Prevalence in Four Medicinal Plant Species from the Lamiaceae Family in Herbal stores in Rasht City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1