Facets of primary and secondary school students' wellbeing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis of Austrian and Italian educational policy

Denis Francesconi, Barbara Gross, Evi Agostini
{"title":"Facets of primary and secondary school students' wellbeing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis of Austrian and Italian educational policy","authors":"Denis Francesconi, Barbara Gross, Evi Agostini","doi":"10.5937/psistra24-32602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus pandemic has revealed the limits of current social and educational structures. In most countries, COVID-19 has compromised the wellbeing of students, but also of their families and teachers. During the first wave of the pandemic, school systems all over the world had to respond quickly and appropriately to the systemic shock it represented, and countries put a variety of different policy measures in place to tackle its extensive impact. The theoretical framework adopted in this paper is a critical perspective and the policy framework is the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); it provides a qualitative analysis of selected educational policies deployed by Italy and Austria to support the wellbeing of school pupils. The two countries deployed different education governance and emergency management strategies, in particular during the first wave of the pandemic. We applied our theoretical and policy frameworks to qualitative content analysis of educational policy documents from February to the end of August 2020, aiming to evaluate the responses to crisis of different education systems and potentially to support their improvement. The overall research question was: How did educational policies in Italy and Austria support students' wellbeing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic? The results confirm that the Italian and Austrian systems had different strategies to support wellbeing and put different initiatives in place. However, educational policies in both countries, and especially Italy, had a stronger focus on the physical wellbeing of individual students during the period under study, and tended to neglect social wellbeing. The paper concludes by reflecting on the opportunities presented by this emergency for school systems to position wellbeing (in the broader sense of eudaimonic wellbeing) at the centre of educational policy","PeriodicalId":31561,"journal":{"name":"Psiholoska Istrazivanja","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psiholoska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/psistra24-32602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has revealed the limits of current social and educational structures. In most countries, COVID-19 has compromised the wellbeing of students, but also of their families and teachers. During the first wave of the pandemic, school systems all over the world had to respond quickly and appropriately to the systemic shock it represented, and countries put a variety of different policy measures in place to tackle its extensive impact. The theoretical framework adopted in this paper is a critical perspective and the policy framework is the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); it provides a qualitative analysis of selected educational policies deployed by Italy and Austria to support the wellbeing of school pupils. The two countries deployed different education governance and emergency management strategies, in particular during the first wave of the pandemic. We applied our theoretical and policy frameworks to qualitative content analysis of educational policy documents from February to the end of August 2020, aiming to evaluate the responses to crisis of different education systems and potentially to support their improvement. The overall research question was: How did educational policies in Italy and Austria support students' wellbeing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic? The results confirm that the Italian and Austrian systems had different strategies to support wellbeing and put different initiatives in place. However, educational policies in both countries, and especially Italy, had a stronger focus on the physical wellbeing of individual students during the period under study, and tended to neglect social wellbeing. The paper concludes by reflecting on the opportunities presented by this emergency for school systems to position wellbeing (in the broader sense of eudaimonic wellbeing) at the centre of educational policy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一波COVID-19大流行期间中小学生福祉的各个方面:奥地利和意大利教育政策的定性分析
冠状病毒大流行暴露了当前社会和教育结构的局限性。在大多数国家,COVID-19不仅损害了学生的福祉,也损害了他们的家庭和教师的福祉。在大流行的第一波期间,世界各地的学校系统必须迅速和适当地应对它所带来的系统性冲击,各国采取了各种不同的政策措施,以应对其广泛影响。本文采用的理论框架是批判性视角,政策框架是联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs);它对意大利和奥地利为支持学生福祉而实施的选定教育政策进行了定性分析。两国部署了不同的教育治理和应急管理战略,特别是在大流行的第一波期间。我们将我们的理论和政策框架应用于2020年2月至8月底的教育政策文件的定性内容分析,旨在评估不同教育系统对危机的反应,并可能为其改进提供支持。总体研究问题是:在第一波COVID-19大流行期间,意大利和奥地利的教育政策如何支持学生的福祉?结果证实,意大利和奥地利的系统有不同的策略来支持福祉,并采取不同的举措。然而,这两个国家的教育政策,尤其是意大利,在研究期间更加注重学生个人的身体健康,而往往忽视社会福利。本文最后反思了学校系统在这种紧急情况下将福祉(更广泛意义上的幸福)置于教育政策中心的机会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between dishonest academic behaviour and students' attitudes towards school offences Relations between the Dark Tetrad traits and the subjective indicators of career success O mnogim identitetima velikog istraživača identitetā - biografija Henrija Tajfela - Brown Rupert: Henri Tajfel: Explorer of identity and difference, Routledge, 2019 The role of social support in the relationship between different coping strategies and the emotional distress in the bereaved elderly Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and impulsivity in the Dark Triad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1