Stories of White World. Samuel Beckett’s Posthuman Authorship

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Avant Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.26913/avant.2021.03.08
M. Kisiel
{"title":"Stories of White World. Samuel Beckett’s Posthuman Authorship","authors":"M. Kisiel","doi":"10.26913/avant.2021.03.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the posthuman authorship in the late short stories of Samuel Beckett in relation to the recent developments in new materialism and material ecology. Beckett’s works insist on the distinctive signature of their author, joining together his trademark minimalist style with his persistence in retelling the same narrative situations over and over again. At the same time, hardly ever does Beckett cease to deprive his narrators of their voices, forcing them to stammer, to struggle with their speech, to be betrayed by it, or to remain completely mute. His hardly readable later short stories seem to abandon any form of the sentient narrator in favour of treating language as self-sufficient matter his abstract spaces consist of, albeit in a manner different from that adopted by the concrete literature. These circumstances interestingly correspond to Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann’s notion of storied matter which emphasises the textual capacities of non-human actors, blurs human and non-human reader-ships/authorships, and affirms the narratives embedded in the material, understood – after Jane Bennett – as the realm of vibrant entities. In my reading, I analyse how these concepts might allow us to rethink those “materialist works” of Beckett and the possible non-human agencies they are entangled in.","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avant","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2021.03.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article focuses on the posthuman authorship in the late short stories of Samuel Beckett in relation to the recent developments in new materialism and material ecology. Beckett’s works insist on the distinctive signature of their author, joining together his trademark minimalist style with his persistence in retelling the same narrative situations over and over again. At the same time, hardly ever does Beckett cease to deprive his narrators of their voices, forcing them to stammer, to struggle with their speech, to be betrayed by it, or to remain completely mute. His hardly readable later short stories seem to abandon any form of the sentient narrator in favour of treating language as self-sufficient matter his abstract spaces consist of, albeit in a manner different from that adopted by the concrete literature. These circumstances interestingly correspond to Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann’s notion of storied matter which emphasises the textual capacities of non-human actors, blurs human and non-human reader-ships/authorships, and affirms the narratives embedded in the material, understood – after Jane Bennett – as the realm of vibrant entities. In my reading, I analyse how these concepts might allow us to rethink those “materialist works” of Beckett and the possible non-human agencies they are entangled in.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白色世界的故事。塞缪尔·贝克特的后人类作者
本文从新唯物主义和物质生态学的新发展出发,探讨了塞缪尔·贝克特后期短篇小说的后人类作者身份。贝克特的作品坚持其作者的独特签名,将他标志性的极简主义风格与他一遍又一遍地复述相同叙事情景的坚持结合在一起。与此同时,贝克特几乎从未停止剥夺他的叙述者的声音,迫使他们口吃,挣扎于他们的语言,被它背叛,或者保持完全沉默。他后来难以读懂的短篇小说似乎放弃了任何形式的感性叙述者,而倾向于将语言视为他的抽象空间所组成的自给自足的物质,尽管其方式不同于具体文学所采用的方式。有趣的是,这些情况与Serenella Iovino和Serpil Oppermann关于故事物质的概念相一致,强调非人类演员的文本能力,模糊了人类和非人类读者/作者身份,并肯定了材料中嵌入的叙事,在Jane Bennett之后被理解为充满活力的实体的领域。在我的阅读中,我分析了这些概念如何让我们重新思考贝克特的“唯物主义作品”以及它们所纠缠的可能的非人类代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Avant
Avant HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
From Cultured Chats to the Chirrups of Choo-Choo-Da-Choos, or How We Found a Key to the Gate of Eden Borrowed Time: Imposed Synchronicity An Examination of Time and its Meaning Festiwale nauki z perspektywy publiczności: analiza treści programów wydarzeń Co ze mną zrobisz, choć mnie nie zobaczysz? Afordancje i Noc Kultury Współtworzenie wiedzy i procesy uczenia się w złożonych systemach społecznych. Przypadek współpracy polskich naukowców z podmiotami spoza uniwersytetu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1