Manufacturing of firearms parts: Relevant sources of information and contribution in a forensic context

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY WIREs. Forensic science Pub Date : 2020-10-25 DOI:10.1002/wfs2.1401
Denis Werner, R. Berthod, Damien Rhumorbarbe, A. Gallusser
{"title":"Manufacturing of firearms parts: Relevant sources of information and contribution in a forensic context","authors":"Denis Werner, R. Berthod, Damien Rhumorbarbe, A. Gallusser","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.1401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of forensic cases involving firearms, a major issue to address is the identification of the firearm used to discharge questioned elements of ammunition – bullets or cartridge cases – found during the scene investigation. When a questioned firearm is available, reference bullets and cartridge cases are produced through controlled test-fires. The marks left on both the questioned and reference elements of ammunition are analysed before being compared. The processes used to manufacture the firearms tend to influence the type and frequency of some of these marks. Knowing how the questioned firearm was produced is a key element to identify the relevant marks for comparison purposes. Finding this information can be challenging, as it is not necessarily publicly available. After presenting the manufacturing processes used to produce the main parts of firearms in contact with the elements of ammunition, this review includes an updated list of processes used by specific manufacturers, relying not only on the literature. The results highlight the necessity to consider a wide range of sources when gathering information about the manufacturing processes. Apart from general and specialized forensic literature, the online content made available by the manufacturers themselves is also a valuable complementary source of information. Contacting the manufacturers or visiting their premises is sometimes necessary to understand the full extent of the processes and how they can influence the marks of forensic interest.","PeriodicalId":75325,"journal":{"name":"WIREs. Forensic science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs. Forensic science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the context of forensic cases involving firearms, a major issue to address is the identification of the firearm used to discharge questioned elements of ammunition – bullets or cartridge cases – found during the scene investigation. When a questioned firearm is available, reference bullets and cartridge cases are produced through controlled test-fires. The marks left on both the questioned and reference elements of ammunition are analysed before being compared. The processes used to manufacture the firearms tend to influence the type and frequency of some of these marks. Knowing how the questioned firearm was produced is a key element to identify the relevant marks for comparison purposes. Finding this information can be challenging, as it is not necessarily publicly available. After presenting the manufacturing processes used to produce the main parts of firearms in contact with the elements of ammunition, this review includes an updated list of processes used by specific manufacturers, relying not only on the literature. The results highlight the necessity to consider a wide range of sources when gathering information about the manufacturing processes. Apart from general and specialized forensic literature, the online content made available by the manufacturers themselves is also a valuable complementary source of information. Contacting the manufacturers or visiting their premises is sometimes necessary to understand the full extent of the processes and how they can influence the marks of forensic interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枪械零件的制造:有关资料的来源和在法医方面的贡献
在涉及火器的法医案件方面,需要解决的一个主要问题是查明在现场调查期间发现的用于发射可疑弹药成分-子弹或弹壳-的火器。当被质疑的枪支可用时,参考子弹和弹壳是通过受控的试射生产的。在进行比较之前,对弹药的质疑元素和参考元素上留下的标记进行分析。用于制造枪支的工艺往往会影响这些标记的类型和频率。了解有关枪械的制造方法,是识别有关标志以作比较的关键因素。查找这些信息可能具有挑战性,因为它不一定是公开的。在介绍了用于生产与弹药元素接触的枪支主要部件的制造工艺之后,本审查不仅依靠文献,还包括特定制造商使用的最新工艺清单。结果强调了在收集有关制造过程的信息时考虑广泛来源的必要性。除了一般和专门的法医文献外,制造商自己提供的在线内容也是一种有价值的补充信息来源。有时有必要与制造商联系或访问他们的场所,以了解整个过程以及它们如何影响法医感兴趣的标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The prevalence, risks, and detection of driving under the influence of nitrous oxide Chlorate‐based homemade explosives: A review The importance of digital evidence strategies The metaverse—Not a new frontier for crime “Noble cause casuistry” in forensic genetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1