The Concept of Power in Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault: A Comparative Analysis/O Conceito de Poder em Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault: Uma Análise Comparativa

Danielle Jacon Ayres Pinto, C. M. Pereira
{"title":"The Concept of Power in Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault: A Comparative Analysis/O Conceito de Poder em Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault: Uma Análise Comparativa","authors":"Danielle Jacon Ayres Pinto, C. M. Pereira","doi":"10.36311/2237-7743.2017.V6N2.07.P344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of power has been the focus of discussion of many thinkers that attempted to understand who are their agents, how it is created and what are its main goals. In this scenario, Michel Foucault and Hannah Arendt have its respective and relevant conceptions of power and how it is expressed in our contemporary society. For the first thinker, power is everywhere and it is exercised in everyday life. For the german philosopher, power is expressed collectivelly. Therefore, the main goal of this essay is to analyse and compare their respective conceptions of power, especially how they understand resistance and violence. In this sense, by using bibliographic resources, this essay is a descriptive and comparative study about the conceptions of power for Hannah Arendt and for Michel Foucault. By a hypothetical-deductive approach, it is understood that the two conceptions are complementary since the French philosopher has a broader concept and Hannah Arendt offers more tools to analyse the possibility of resistance to power. In fact, the two thinkers offer us tools to comprehend power as a positive, criative and fluid factor. Keywords: Power; Michel Foucault; Hannah Arendt. Resumo: O conceito de poder tem sido foco de discussao de muitos pensadores que tentam entender seus agentes, como e criado e quais sao seus objetivos. Neste cenario, Michel Foucault e Hannah Arendt possuem suas respectivas e relevantes contribuicoes sobre o que e poder e como ele e expresso na nossa sociedade contemporânea. Para o primeiro pensador, o poder esta em todos os lugares e e exercicio cotidianamente. Para a pensadora alema, o poder e expressado por uma coletividade. O objetivo deste artigo, portanto, e analisar e comparar suas visoes sobre poder, sobretudo sobre como entendem resistencia e violencia. Dessa forma, partindo de fontes bibliograficas, realiza-se um estudo descritivo e comparado das visoes de poder para Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault. Com abordagem hipotetica-dedutiva, compreende-se que as duas concepcoes podem ser consideradas como complementares uma vez que o filosofo frances possui um conceito mais amplo que Hannah Arendt e esta contribui melhor para se analisar a possibilidade de resistencia ao poder. De fato, estes dois autores nos possibilitam compreender o poder enquanto fator positivo, criador e fluido. Palavras-chave: Poder; Michel Foucault; Hannah Arendt.","PeriodicalId":37936,"journal":{"name":"Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations","volume":"280 1","pages":"344-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36311/2237-7743.2017.V6N2.07.P344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of power has been the focus of discussion of many thinkers that attempted to understand who are their agents, how it is created and what are its main goals. In this scenario, Michel Foucault and Hannah Arendt have its respective and relevant conceptions of power and how it is expressed in our contemporary society. For the first thinker, power is everywhere and it is exercised in everyday life. For the german philosopher, power is expressed collectivelly. Therefore, the main goal of this essay is to analyse and compare their respective conceptions of power, especially how they understand resistance and violence. In this sense, by using bibliographic resources, this essay is a descriptive and comparative study about the conceptions of power for Hannah Arendt and for Michel Foucault. By a hypothetical-deductive approach, it is understood that the two conceptions are complementary since the French philosopher has a broader concept and Hannah Arendt offers more tools to analyse the possibility of resistance to power. In fact, the two thinkers offer us tools to comprehend power as a positive, criative and fluid factor. Keywords: Power; Michel Foucault; Hannah Arendt. Resumo: O conceito de poder tem sido foco de discussao de muitos pensadores que tentam entender seus agentes, como e criado e quais sao seus objetivos. Neste cenario, Michel Foucault e Hannah Arendt possuem suas respectivas e relevantes contribuicoes sobre o que e poder e como ele e expresso na nossa sociedade contemporânea. Para o primeiro pensador, o poder esta em todos os lugares e e exercicio cotidianamente. Para a pensadora alema, o poder e expressado por uma coletividade. O objetivo deste artigo, portanto, e analisar e comparar suas visoes sobre poder, sobretudo sobre como entendem resistencia e violencia. Dessa forma, partindo de fontes bibliograficas, realiza-se um estudo descritivo e comparado das visoes de poder para Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault. Com abordagem hipotetica-dedutiva, compreende-se que as duas concepcoes podem ser consideradas como complementares uma vez que o filosofo frances possui um conceito mais amplo que Hannah Arendt e esta contribui melhor para se analisar a possibilidade de resistencia ao poder. De fato, estes dois autores nos possibilitam compreender o poder enquanto fator positivo, criador e fluido. Palavras-chave: Poder; Michel Foucault; Hannah Arendt.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汉娜·阿伦特与米歇尔·福柯的权力概念:比较分析/汉娜·阿伦特与米歇尔·福柯的权力概念:比较分析
权力的概念一直是许多思想家讨论的焦点,他们试图理解谁是他们的代理人,权力是如何产生的,权力的主要目标是什么。在这种情况下,米歇尔·福柯和汉娜·阿伦特都有各自相关的权力概念,以及它在我们当代社会中的表达方式。对于第一个思想家来说,权力无处不在,它在日常生活中得到运用。对于这位德国哲学家来说,权力是集体表达的。因此,本文的主要目的是分析和比较他们各自的权力概念,特别是他们如何理解抵抗和暴力。从这个意义上说,本文利用文献资源,对汉娜·阿伦特和米歇尔·福柯的权力概念进行了描述性和对比性研究。通过假设-演绎的方法,可以理解这两个概念是互补的,因为法国哲学家有一个更广泛的概念,汉娜·阿伦特提供了更多的工具来分析抵抗权力的可能性。事实上,这两位思想家为我们提供了将权力理解为一种积极的、创造性的、流动的因素的工具。关键词:电力;米歇尔·福柯;汉娜·阿伦特。简历:设想一个项目的目标,讨论一个项目的目标,讨论一个项目的目标,讨论一个项目的目标。在这种情况下,米歇尔·福柯和汉娜·阿伦特被认为是他们各自的相关贡献,他们对当代社会的表达方式做出了重要贡献。第1段第1段指出:“我认为这是一种非常有价值的做法。”Para a pensadora alema, or or or expressado a coletividade。O objetivo deste artigo portanto e analisar e comparar为visoes尤其能够,sobretudo尤其科莫entendem雷西斯滕西亚e violencia。形式上的差异,参考文献的差异,实现了对汉娜·阿伦特和米歇尔·福柯的比较研究。摘要:汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)提出了一种新的概念,认为“综合-综合-综合”和“综合-综合”是两种概念的共同补充,“综合-综合”是两种概念的共同补充,“综合-综合-综合”是两种概念的共同补充。事实上,评估本身就不可能成为一种理解者,也不可能成为一种积极因素、标准因素和流体因素。Palavras-chave:可以;米歇尔·福柯;汉娜·阿伦特。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations
Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: AUSTRAL: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations was the first Brazilian journal in the area of International Relations to be fully published in English (2012). It is an essentially academic vehicle, linked to the Brazilian Centre of Strategy & International Relations (NERINT) and the Doctoral Program in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI) of the Faculty of Economics (FCE) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Its pluralist focus aims to contribute to the debate on the international political and economic order from the perspective of the developing world. The journal publishes original articles in the area of Strategy and International Relations, with special interest in issues related to developing countries and South-South Cooperation – its security problems; the political, economic and diplomatic developments of emerging countries; and their relations with the traditional powers. AUSTRAL is published semi-annually in English and Portuguese. The journal’s target audience consists of researchers, experts, diplomats, military personnel and graduate students of International Relations. The content of the journal consists of in-depth analytical articles written by experts (Professors and Doctors), focusing on each of the great continents of the South: Asia, Latin America and Africa. Thus, the debate and diffusion of knowledge produced in these regions is stimulated. All contributions submitted to AUSTRAL are subject to rigorous scientific evaluation.
期刊最新文献
FROM THE KAZAKHSTAN CRISIS TO SEE HOW RUSSIA INVOLVED IN GLOBAL SECURITY GOVERNANCE AS CONSEQUÊNCIAS DOS ATENTADOS DE 11 DE SETEMBRO DE 2001 PARA A ECONOMIA BRASILEIRA A COR DO GATO GEOPOLÍTICA NORTE-AMERICANA E CHINESA EM PERSPECTIVA COMPARADA CENTRO, PERIFERIA OU SEMIPERIFERIA NAS CADEIAS GLOBAIS DE VALOR? AS POSIÇÕES DO BRASIL E DA CHINA NA ECONOMIA-MUNDO CONTEMPORÂNEA (2005-2015) A RESOLUÇÃO DO CONFLITO ISRAELO-LIBANÊS PELO CONSELHO DE SEGURANÇA DA ONU (2006)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1