Validity of the classification of emergency service requests related to suicidal behavior

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Salud Mental Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.008
Javier Ramos-Martín, Évelin Lourdes Rueda-Artero, J. D. Campo-Ávila, A. I. Martínez-García, Pilar Castillo-Jiménez, B. Moreno-Küstner
{"title":"Validity of the classification of emergency service requests related to suicidal behavior","authors":"Javier Ramos-Martín, Évelin Lourdes Rueda-Artero, J. D. Campo-Ávila, A. I. Martínez-García, Pilar Castillo-Jiménez, B. Moreno-Küstner","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Suicide attempts are the most predictive risk factor for suicide deaths. Most people who attempt suicide receive care from out-of-hospital Emergency Services (OES), where these requests are managed and classified. Objective. Validate the Emergency Coordination Center (ECC) classification for the detection of suicidal behavior requests. Method. A descriptive, cross-sectional study of requests to the ECC of Málaga (Spain) during 2013 and 2014 was conducted. To classify the requests, the authors considered the ECC categorization when answering the call and the clinical assessment of the healthcare professional when attending the person who had made the call at the scene, which was considered the reference standard. To analyze the validity of the ECC classification system, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. Results. The total number of requests for medical assistance analyzed was 112,599. The validity indicators of the classification system for suicidal behavior were sensitivity = 44.78%, specificity = 99.34%, PPV = 46.91% and NPV = 99.28%. Discussion and conclusion. The ECC classification system has a lower capacity to detect the presence of suicidal behavior and a higher capacity to identify its absence in the requests received. OES provide key information on suicidal behavior requests as they can be one of the first places people with this problem go to. It would therefore be extremely useful to improve the classification systems for requests related to suicidal behavior.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. Suicide attempts are the most predictive risk factor for suicide deaths. Most people who attempt suicide receive care from out-of-hospital Emergency Services (OES), where these requests are managed and classified. Objective. Validate the Emergency Coordination Center (ECC) classification for the detection of suicidal behavior requests. Method. A descriptive, cross-sectional study of requests to the ECC of Málaga (Spain) during 2013 and 2014 was conducted. To classify the requests, the authors considered the ECC categorization when answering the call and the clinical assessment of the healthcare professional when attending the person who had made the call at the scene, which was considered the reference standard. To analyze the validity of the ECC classification system, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. Results. The total number of requests for medical assistance analyzed was 112,599. The validity indicators of the classification system for suicidal behavior were sensitivity = 44.78%, specificity = 99.34%, PPV = 46.91% and NPV = 99.28%. Discussion and conclusion. The ECC classification system has a lower capacity to detect the presence of suicidal behavior and a higher capacity to identify its absence in the requests received. OES provide key information on suicidal behavior requests as they can be one of the first places people with this problem go to. It would therefore be extremely useful to improve the classification systems for requests related to suicidal behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与自杀行为有关的紧急服务请求分类的有效性
介绍。自杀企图是自杀死亡的最具预测性的风险因素。大多数企图自杀的人接受院外急救服务(OES)的治疗,这些请求在那里得到管理和分类。目标。验证紧急协调中心(ECC)分类,以检测自杀行为请求。方法。对2013年和2014年期间向Málaga(西班牙)的ECC提出的请求进行了描述性横断面研究。为了对请求进行分类,作者在接听电话时考虑了ECC分类,在现场就诊时考虑了医疗保健专业人员的临床评估,并将其作为参考标准。为了分析ECC分类系统的有效性,我们计算了敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值(PPV和NPV)。结果。所分析的医疗援助请求总数为112 599件。自杀行为分类系统的效度指标为敏感性44.78%、特异性99.34%、PPV 46.91%、NPV 99.28%。讨论与结论。在收到的请求中,ECC分类系统检测自杀行为存在的能力较低,而识别其不存在的能力较高。OES提供了有关自杀行为请求的关键信息,因为它们可能是有自杀问题的人最先去的地方之一。因此,改进与自杀行为有关的请求的分类系统将是非常有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Mental
Salud Mental PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with the presence of depression, anxiety, and substance use in health students from 10 Latin American countries during the COVID-19 pandemic Predictive Factors for Suicidal Behaviors among University Students in the North-Central Region of Mexico Protection and Risk Factors for Attempted Suicide in Mexican Students Majoring in Psychology The relevance of social analysis in mental health research Inferential confusion in the worldview of individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD): a qualitative approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1