Analysis of the Effects and Regional Heterogeneity of Wind Energy Industry Policy in China

Yan Chen, Caihong Tian
{"title":"Analysis of the Effects and Regional Heterogeneity of Wind Energy Industry Policy in China","authors":"Yan Chen, Caihong Tian","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3880846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subject to the dual constraints of energy and climate, wind energy has become a major development trend in the world as a renewable energy next only to hydropower. In this paper, the effects of wind energy industry policy are evaluated based on fixed-effect model, and the regional heterogeneity of wind energy industry policy is discussed based on wind resources. It is concluded that the implementation of wind energy industry policy can significantly increase wind power output without regard to the the regional differences in wind resources. In terms of the effectiveness of policy, demand-oriented policy instruments play a most important role, supply-oriented policy instruments play the second role, and environment-oriented policy instruments play the weakest role. Considering the regional differences in wind resources, the effect of the same policy varies greatly in areas with different wind resources: Supply-oriented policy instruments are slightly more effective in areas with rich wind resources, demand-oriented policy instruments are more effective in areas with poor wind resources, and environment-oriented policy instruments are significantly more effective in areas with poor wind resources.","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"14 10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subject to the dual constraints of energy and climate, wind energy has become a major development trend in the world as a renewable energy next only to hydropower. In this paper, the effects of wind energy industry policy are evaluated based on fixed-effect model, and the regional heterogeneity of wind energy industry policy is discussed based on wind resources. It is concluded that the implementation of wind energy industry policy can significantly increase wind power output without regard to the the regional differences in wind resources. In terms of the effectiveness of policy, demand-oriented policy instruments play a most important role, supply-oriented policy instruments play the second role, and environment-oriented policy instruments play the weakest role. Considering the regional differences in wind resources, the effect of the same policy varies greatly in areas with different wind resources: Supply-oriented policy instruments are slightly more effective in areas with rich wind resources, demand-oriented policy instruments are more effective in areas with poor wind resources, and environment-oriented policy instruments are significantly more effective in areas with poor wind resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国风能产业政策效果及区域异质性分析
在能源和气候的双重约束下,风能作为仅次于水电的可再生能源,已成为世界发展的一大趋势。本文基于固定效应模型对风电产业政策效果进行了评价,并基于风电资源分析了风电产业政策的区域异质性。结果表明,在不考虑风电资源区域差异的情况下,实施风能产业政策可以显著提高风电产量。在政策有效性方面,需求导向的政策工具作用最大,供给导向的政策工具作用次之,环境导向的政策工具作用最弱。考虑到风资源的区域差异,同一政策在不同风资源地区的效果差异较大:供给导向的政策工具在风资源丰富的地区略显有效,需求导向的政策工具在风资源贫乏的地区更有效,环境导向的政策工具在风资源贫乏的地区显著更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and State-Building in the World’s Most Agricultural Countries The heterogeneous effects of agricultural conservation easements on the loss of farmland to development in New England Displacement Risk in Agricultural Commodity Markets: The Impact of Plant-Based Meat Interest Group Responses to Reform Efforts in the U.S. House of Representatives: The Case of Big Sugar Fishing under the Radar: Illuminating the Compliance Gap of Fishing Bans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1