Performances Evaluation of Sugarcane Genotypes (Cuba 2012) at Finchaa Sugar Estate

A. Shitahun, T. Feyissa, S. Abebech, F. Mabrahtom, T. Essaya, T. Melaku, D. Zinawu, S. Dereje
{"title":"Performances Evaluation of Sugarcane Genotypes (Cuba 2012) at Finchaa Sugar Estate","authors":"A. Shitahun, T. Feyissa, S. Abebech, F. Mabrahtom, T. Essaya, T. Melaku, D. Zinawu, S. Dereje","doi":"10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate to evaluate the performance of eleven introduced in 2012 Cuban sugarcane genotypes for Plant Cane (PC) and first ratoon (R-I). The experimental design used was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), laid out in three replicates. Data were collected for millable stalk, plant height, stalk diameter, single stalk weight, cane yield, brix % juice, pol percent, sugar recovery percent and sugar yield. The differences among the Elven Cuban genotypes and two standard checks were highly significant for all analyzed quantitative traits. Generally, in both plant cane and Ratoon I crop cycles C88-556, C88-356, C90530 and C13281gave higher performances in cane and sugar yield (tons/ha) than the checks B 52298 and NCO 334. Therefore C 88-556, C 132-81, C 90-530 and C 88356 were recommended for seed increase to use in further verification on large plots sooner as Ratoon II data will be confirmed.","PeriodicalId":13830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":"251-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate to evaluate the performance of eleven introduced in 2012 Cuban sugarcane genotypes for Plant Cane (PC) and first ratoon (R-I). The experimental design used was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), laid out in three replicates. Data were collected for millable stalk, plant height, stalk diameter, single stalk weight, cane yield, brix % juice, pol percent, sugar recovery percent and sugar yield. The differences among the Elven Cuban genotypes and two standard checks were highly significant for all analyzed quantitative traits. Generally, in both plant cane and Ratoon I crop cycles C88-556, C88-356, C90530 and C13281gave higher performances in cane and sugar yield (tons/ha) than the checks B 52298 and NCO 334. Therefore C 88-556, C 132-81, C 90-530 and C 88356 were recommended for seed increase to use in further verification on large plots sooner as Ratoon II data will be confirmed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finchaa糖业庄园甘蔗基因型性能评价(古巴,2012)
本研究是在Fincha糖业庄园进行的,目的是评估2012年引进的11个古巴甘蔗基因型植物甘蔗(PC)和第一再生甘蔗(r - 1)的性能。试验设计采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD),设3个重复。收集了可磨茎、株高、茎粗、单茎重、甘蔗产量、糖度%果汁、pol率、糖回收率和糖产量的数据。在所有分析的数量性状上,古巴精灵基因型和两个标准检验之间的差异都非常显著。一般来说,在甘蔗和Ratoon I作物周期中,C88-556、C88-356、C90530和c13281在甘蔗和糖产量(吨/公顷)方面的表现都高于b52298和NCO 334。因此,推荐C 88-556、C 132-81、C 90-530和C 88356进行增种,以便在Ratoon II数据得到确认后尽快在大面积地块上进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 62 – Polycystic Ovary Syndrome COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THE SPLEEN OF YOUNG AND AGED BALB/C AND CD-1 MICE A Review study on “The effect of Metoprolol and Losartan on Isoprenaline Induced Heart Failure Mice”. Sophisticated Instrumental Evaluation of Novel Siddha Raw Drug -Manosilai: An Modern Approach towards Drug Standardization Investigation of effects of sleep disorder in infertile couples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1