Investigating Student Engagement in First-Year Biology Education: A Comparison of Major and Non-Major Perception of Engagement Across Different Active Learning Activities

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2019-05-31 DOI:10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7993
Devin Hymers, Genevieve Newton
{"title":"Investigating Student Engagement in First-Year Biology Education: A Comparison of Major and Non-Major Perception of Engagement Across Different Active Learning Activities","authors":"Devin Hymers, Genevieve Newton","doi":"10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational techniques that improve student engagement have repeatedly been shown to improve performance at the class level at many institutions and in multiple disciplines. However, knowledge of engagement in individual activities in large first-year classes, where there may be several sub-populations of students in different programs reflecting varied interests, is limited. In this study, we examined two large, lecture-based, introductory first-year biology classes to determine whether there were any relationships between specific learning activities and student engagement and performance, both at the class level and as broken down by program of study. Surveys were used to quantify the level of student engagement through four activities: (a) student response systems (clickers), (b) in-class discussions and activities, (c) lab and seminar activities, and (d) interdisciplinary learning. Engagement scores were then compared to students’ final grades. Students in all majors who reported higher levels of participation in most activities studied also reported feeling more engaged overall and achieved higher grades than their less-engaged peers; however, students in non-biology majors demonstrated notably weaker relationships between their engagement and performance in biology courses, where such relationships existed at all. In this paper, we discuss the learning activities which are associated with the greatest performance increases in both biology and non-biology majors and suggest how these results may be used to inform instructional techniques to benefit all students, regardless of major, in future course offerings.","PeriodicalId":44267,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Educational techniques that improve student engagement have repeatedly been shown to improve performance at the class level at many institutions and in multiple disciplines. However, knowledge of engagement in individual activities in large first-year classes, where there may be several sub-populations of students in different programs reflecting varied interests, is limited. In this study, we examined two large, lecture-based, introductory first-year biology classes to determine whether there were any relationships between specific learning activities and student engagement and performance, both at the class level and as broken down by program of study. Surveys were used to quantify the level of student engagement through four activities: (a) student response systems (clickers), (b) in-class discussions and activities, (c) lab and seminar activities, and (d) interdisciplinary learning. Engagement scores were then compared to students’ final grades. Students in all majors who reported higher levels of participation in most activities studied also reported feeling more engaged overall and achieved higher grades than their less-engaged peers; however, students in non-biology majors demonstrated notably weaker relationships between their engagement and performance in biology courses, where such relationships existed at all. In this paper, we discuss the learning activities which are associated with the greatest performance increases in both biology and non-biology majors and suggest how these results may be used to inform instructional techniques to benefit all students, regardless of major, in future course offerings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查学生在第一年生物教育中的投入:不同主动学习活动中专业和非专业投入感知的比较
在许多机构和多个学科中,提高学生参与度的教育技术一再被证明可以提高班级水平的表现。然而,在大的一年级班级中,参与个人活动的知识是有限的,在不同的课程中可能有几个学生亚群,反映了不同的兴趣。在这项研究中,我们研究了两个大型的,以讲座为基础的,第一年的介绍性生物学课程,以确定在班级层面和学习项目中,特定的学习活动与学生的参与和表现之间是否存在任何关系。通过调查来量化学生参与四个活动的水平:(a)学生响应系统(点击器),(b)课堂讨论和活动,(c)实验室和研讨会活动,以及(d)跨学科学习。然后将参与得分与学生的最终成绩进行比较。所有专业的学生都报告说,在大多数研究活动中,参与程度较高的学生总体上感觉更投入,比参与程度较低的同龄人取得了更高的成绩;然而,非生物专业的学生表现出他们在生物课程中的投入和表现之间的关系明显较弱,如果这种关系存在的话。在本文中,我们讨论了与生物和非生物专业学生成绩提高有关的学习活动,并建议如何将这些结果用于指导教学技术,以使所有学生受益,无论专业如何,在未来的课程设置中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Value of Integrating Writing and Writing Instruction into a Research Methods Course Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Barriers to Study Abroad Renewing our Commitment to Teaching Excellence through SoTL: An Introduction to Issue 14.1 Developing an Undergraduate Career Conference: Leveraging Mentorship to Promote Career Discovery Facilitated Study Groups for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry: Experience from a Large Public Canadian University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1