{"title":"Giant Polarization in Nanodielectrics: (Invited Paper)","authors":"C. Homes","doi":"10.1109/NMDC50713.2021.9677542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relative permittivity of a material is a scaling factor for capacitors and the devices based upon them; the larger the relative permittivity, the greater the degree of miniaturization, or potential for energy storage. Materials with a relative permittivity than that of silicon nitride (approximately 7) are referred to as high-dielectric constant materials. Values of about 100 are typical in titanium dioxide rutile. Values of about 10,000 are observed in barium titanate in the region of the ferroelectric transition, which while impressive, is not very useful due to the strong temperature dependence. The observation of a relative permittivity of over 100,000 in the calcium copper titanate material sparked considerable interest because it showed little temperature dependence between 100 and 600 K over most of the radio-frequency range. Further investigation revealed that this material appears to be naturally nanotextured and that the colossal permittivity was likely due to the surface and/or internal barrier layer capacitance effect, although the issue is not settled. Unfortunately, the dielectric losses in this class materials are relatively high. A new strategy to achieve high dielectric permittivity with low loss involves using localized lattice defect states through ambipolar co-doping; these intrinsic defect complexes give rise to strong dipoles that are responsible for a relative permittivity of 10,000 with exceptionally low dielectric losses over most of the radio frequency range and excellent thermal stability.","PeriodicalId":6742,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 16th Nanotechnology Materials and Devices Conference (NMDC)","volume":"9 4 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 16th Nanotechnology Materials and Devices Conference (NMDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NMDC50713.2021.9677542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The relative permittivity of a material is a scaling factor for capacitors and the devices based upon them; the larger the relative permittivity, the greater the degree of miniaturization, or potential for energy storage. Materials with a relative permittivity than that of silicon nitride (approximately 7) are referred to as high-dielectric constant materials. Values of about 100 are typical in titanium dioxide rutile. Values of about 10,000 are observed in barium titanate in the region of the ferroelectric transition, which while impressive, is not very useful due to the strong temperature dependence. The observation of a relative permittivity of over 100,000 in the calcium copper titanate material sparked considerable interest because it showed little temperature dependence between 100 and 600 K over most of the radio-frequency range. Further investigation revealed that this material appears to be naturally nanotextured and that the colossal permittivity was likely due to the surface and/or internal barrier layer capacitance effect, although the issue is not settled. Unfortunately, the dielectric losses in this class materials are relatively high. A new strategy to achieve high dielectric permittivity with low loss involves using localized lattice defect states through ambipolar co-doping; these intrinsic defect complexes give rise to strong dipoles that are responsible for a relative permittivity of 10,000 with exceptionally low dielectric losses over most of the radio frequency range and excellent thermal stability.