Trends in belichaamde cognitie : Spanningen rondom biologie en bewuste ervaring

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 N/A PHILOSOPHY TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE Pub Date : 2009-09-30 DOI:10.2143/TVF.71.3.2042676
F. Keijzer
{"title":"Trends in belichaamde cognitie : Spanningen rondom biologie en bewuste ervaring","authors":"F. Keijzer","doi":"10.2143/TVF.71.3.2042676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Embodied cognition has come of age and is now diversifying. In this paper, I discuss four different approaches within embodied cognition: a biogenic approach, an enactive approach, a sensorimotor approach and a scaffolding approach. The four approaches can be differentiated according to their commitments to either biology (biogenic and enactive approaches) and/or experience (enactive and sensorimotor approaches). I will argue that these differences are substantial, but that a reconciliation is possible and even desirable. Seen in this light, embodied cognition can remain a comparatively unified field, these diverging approaches notwithstanding.","PeriodicalId":53935,"journal":{"name":"TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/TVF.71.3.2042676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Embodied cognition has come of age and is now diversifying. In this paper, I discuss four different approaches within embodied cognition: a biogenic approach, an enactive approach, a sensorimotor approach and a scaffolding approach. The four approaches can be differentiated according to their commitments to either biology (biogenic and enactive approaches) and/or experience (enactive and sensorimotor approaches). I will argue that these differences are substantial, but that a reconciliation is possible and even desirable. Seen in this light, embodied cognition can remain a comparatively unified field, these diverging approaches notwithstanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具体认知的趋势:围绕生物学和意识体验的紧张关系
具身认知已经成熟并呈现多样化。在本文中,我讨论了具身认知的四种不同方法:生物源方法,动作方法,感觉运动方法和脚手架方法。这四种方法可以根据它们对生物学(生物源性和动作性方法)和/或经验(动作性和感觉运动方法)的承诺来区分。我认为,这些差异是巨大的,但和解是可能的,甚至是可取的。从这个角度来看,具身认知可以保持一个相对统一的领域,尽管有这些不同的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: In het Tijdschrift voor Filosofie verschijnen thematische bijdragen, historische en kritische studies, literatuuroverzichten, boekbesprekingen en kronieken. Het staat open voor alle actuele stromingen in en voor discussies op de verscheidene domeinen van de filosofie. Het Tijdschrift voor Filosofie bevat bijdragen van filosofen uit verschillende landen. Het besteedt in het bijzonder aandacht aan het wijsgerige leven in Nederland en Vlaanderen en wil op wetenschappelijk niveau het wijsgerig gesprek in het Nederlands bevorderen. Elke bijdrage wordt ‘dubbel blind’ beoordeeld door tenminste twee deskundigen, afkomstig van verschillende universiteiten.
期刊最新文献
Een zee in het midden van de wereld : Afrikaans-Europese migratie, zwarte filosofie en het einde van de witte mythologie De nieuwe poortwachters van de waarheid Vieweg, Klaus: Hegel. Der Philosoph der Freiheit. Biographie. München: C.H. Beck 2019 "The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation" redactie: Lisa Disch, Nadia Urbinati, Mathijs van de Sande Free will skepticism, just deserts and justice without retribution an interview with Farah Focquaert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1