Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pus/Wound Swab Samples of the Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal

Raghabendra Adhikari, N. Pant, S. Neupane, Mukesh Neupane, Roshan Bhattarai, S. Bhatta, R. Chaudhary, B. Lekhak
{"title":"Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pus/Wound Swab Samples of the Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal","authors":"Raghabendra Adhikari, N. Pant, S. Neupane, Mukesh Neupane, Roshan Bhattarai, S. Bhatta, R. Chaudhary, B. Lekhak","doi":"10.1155/2017/2191532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was conducted to evaluate the performance of cefoxitin disc diffusion method and oxacillin broth microdilution method for detection of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), taking presence of mecA gene as reference. In addition, inducible clindamycin resistance and beta-lactamase production were studied and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin for S. aureus isolates was determined. A total of 711 nonrepeated pus/wound swab samples from different anatomic locations were included in the study. The Staphylococcus aureus was identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram's stain, and biochemical tests. A total of 110 (15.47%) S. aureus isolates were recovered, of which 39 (35.50%) isolates were identified as MRSA by cefoxitin disc diffusion method. By oxacillin broth microdilution method, 31.82% of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates were found to be MRSA. However, mecA gene was present in only 29.1% of the isolates. Further, beta-lactamase production was observed in 71.82% of the isolates, while inducible clindamycin resistance was found in 10% of S. aureus isolates. The MIC value of vancomycin for S. aureus ranged from 0.016 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL. On the basis of the absolute sensitivity (100%), both phenotypic methods could be employed for routine diagnosis of MRSA in clinical microbiology laboratory; however cefoxitin disc diffusion could be preferred over MIC method considering time and labour factor.","PeriodicalId":22481,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology = Journal Canadien des Maladies Infectieuses et de la Microbiologie Médicale","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology = Journal Canadien des Maladies Infectieuses et de la Microbiologie Médicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2191532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the performance of cefoxitin disc diffusion method and oxacillin broth microdilution method for detection of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), taking presence of mecA gene as reference. In addition, inducible clindamycin resistance and beta-lactamase production were studied and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin for S. aureus isolates was determined. A total of 711 nonrepeated pus/wound swab samples from different anatomic locations were included in the study. The Staphylococcus aureus was identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram's stain, and biochemical tests. A total of 110 (15.47%) S. aureus isolates were recovered, of which 39 (35.50%) isolates were identified as MRSA by cefoxitin disc diffusion method. By oxacillin broth microdilution method, 31.82% of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates were found to be MRSA. However, mecA gene was present in only 29.1% of the isolates. Further, beta-lactamase production was observed in 71.82% of the isolates, while inducible clindamycin resistance was found in 10% of S. aureus isolates. The MIC value of vancomycin for S. aureus ranged from 0.016 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL. On the basis of the absolute sensitivity (100%), both phenotypic methods could be employed for routine diagnosis of MRSA in clinical microbiology laboratory; however cefoxitin disc diffusion could be preferred over MIC method considering time and labour factor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的检测及万古霉素对尼泊尔加德满都三级医院脓/伤口拭子标本中金黄色葡萄球菌的最低抑菌浓度测定
本研究以mecA基因的存在为参照,评价头孢西丁圆盘扩散法和奥西林肉汤微量稀释法检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的性能。此外,还研究了万古霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌的诱导耐药性和β -内酰胺酶的产生,并确定了万古霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌的最低抑制浓度(MIC)。共有711份来自不同解剖部位的非重复脓液/伤口拭子样本被纳入研究。根据菌落形态、革兰氏染色和生化试验鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌。共检出金黄色葡萄球菌110株(15.47%),其中头孢西丁纸片扩散法检出MRSA 39株(35.50%)。用莫西林肉汤微量稀释法检出金黄色葡萄球菌为MRSA的比例为31.82%。然而,mecA基因仅在29.1%的分离株中存在。71.82%的金黄色葡萄球菌产生β -内酰胺酶,10%的金黄色葡萄球菌产生克林霉素诱导耐药。万古霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌的MIC值为0.016 ~ 1 μg/mL。在绝对敏感性(100%)的基础上,两种表型方法均可用于临床微生物实验室常规诊断MRSA;但考虑到时间和劳动因素,头孢西丁圆盘扩散法优于MIC法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circulating Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Variants between April 2021 and February 2022 in Turkey Global Occupational Exposure to Blood and Body Fluids among Healthcare Workers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Baptism of Fire: Modeling the Effects of Prescribed Fire on Lyme Disease Spatiotemporal Study of COVID-19 in Fars Province, Iran, October-November 2020: Establishment of Early Warning System Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 New Variants and Their Clinical Significance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1