Liberal Internationalism and the Populist Backlash

E. Posner
{"title":"Liberal Internationalism and the Populist Backlash","authors":"E. Posner","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2898357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A populist backlash around the world has targeted international law and legal institutions. Populists see international law as a device used by global elites to dominate policymaking and benefit themselves at the expense of the common people. This turn of events exposes the hollowness at the core of mainstream international law scholarship, for which the expansion of international law and the erosion of sovereignty have always been a forgone conclusion. But international law is dependent on public trust in technocratic rule-by-elites, which has been called into question by a series of international crises.","PeriodicalId":80553,"journal":{"name":"Arizona State law journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"795"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona State law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2898357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

A populist backlash around the world has targeted international law and legal institutions. Populists see international law as a device used by global elites to dominate policymaking and benefit themselves at the expense of the common people. This turn of events exposes the hollowness at the core of mainstream international law scholarship, for which the expansion of international law and the erosion of sovereignty have always been a forgone conclusion. But international law is dependent on public trust in technocratic rule-by-elites, which has been called into question by a series of international crises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由国际主义和民粹主义的反弹
世界各地的民粹主义反弹针对的是国际法和法律机构。民粹主义者认为,国际法是全球精英用来主导政策制定、以牺牲普通民众为代价为自己谋利的工具。这一事件的转变暴露了主流国际法学术核心的空洞,因为国际法的扩张和主权的侵蚀一直是不可避免的结果。但国际法依赖于公众对精英技术官僚统治的信任,而这一点已被一系列国际危机所质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guns, Knives, and Swords: Policing a Heavily Armed Arizona Liberal Internationalism and the Populist Backlash Google Glass While Driving Behavioral Legal Ethics Raising the Bar: Law Schools and Legal Institutions Leading to Educate Undocumented Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1