Sociological Theory from Dialogic Democracy

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS Pub Date : 2019-11-30 DOI:10.17583/rimcis.2019.4919
Elisabeth Torras-Gómez, Mengna Guo, M. Ramis
{"title":"Sociological Theory from Dialogic Democracy","authors":"Elisabeth Torras-Gómez, Mengna Guo, M. Ramis","doi":"10.17583/rimcis.2019.4919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the long dialogical tradition both in Eastern and Western societies, in recent years the social dialogical turn is more and more evident in many domains of life. Citizens increasingly demand to have a saying in the seeking of solutions for their problematics, and advocate for a more democratic approach to science that fosters the inclusion of all voices and enhances the agency of citizens in social transformation. Therefore, global scientific research is progressively more oriented towards co-creation as a means to ensure social impact. In this context, social theory can provide the theoretical foundations to better address the societal challenges of concern, as well as the mechanisms to properly design research oriented to produce social impact, such as communicative methodology, and to monitor and evaluate such impact. Social theory would then serve its ultimate goal: to contribute to the improvement of societies. Sociology was born as part of the democracies to provide citizens with elements of analysis that would make it possible for them to make their decisions with the prior evidence of the consequences of each option. After a process of democratization, we return to the original sense, but now in a more democratic situation.","PeriodicalId":43006,"journal":{"name":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.4919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Despite the long dialogical tradition both in Eastern and Western societies, in recent years the social dialogical turn is more and more evident in many domains of life. Citizens increasingly demand to have a saying in the seeking of solutions for their problematics, and advocate for a more democratic approach to science that fosters the inclusion of all voices and enhances the agency of citizens in social transformation. Therefore, global scientific research is progressively more oriented towards co-creation as a means to ensure social impact. In this context, social theory can provide the theoretical foundations to better address the societal challenges of concern, as well as the mechanisms to properly design research oriented to produce social impact, such as communicative methodology, and to monitor and evaluate such impact. Social theory would then serve its ultimate goal: to contribute to the improvement of societies. Sociology was born as part of the democracies to provide citizens with elements of analysis that would make it possible for them to make their decisions with the prior evidence of the consequences of each option. After a process of democratization, we return to the original sense, but now in a more democratic situation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对话民主的社会学理论
尽管东西方社会都有着悠久的对话传统,但近年来,社会对话转向在生活的许多领域越来越明显。公民越来越多地要求在为他们的问题寻求解决方案时拥有发言权,并倡导一种更民主的科学方法,促进所有声音的包容,增强公民在社会转型中的作用。因此,全球科学研究逐渐趋向于将共同创造作为确保社会影响的手段。在此背景下,社会理论可以提供理论基础,以更好地解决所关注的社会挑战,以及适当设计以产生社会影响为导向的研究的机制,如交际方法,并监测和评估这种影响。这样,社会理论将服务于它的最终目标:促进社会的改善。社会学是作为民主制度的一部分而诞生的,目的是为公民提供分析的要素,使他们能够根据每种选择的后果的先验证据做出决定。经过一个民主化的过程,我们回到了原来的意义上,只不过现在处于一个更加民主的境地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Harmonization Between Humans and Animals Particularly the Balinese Dog Race in Bali Ethics And Social Procedures In Lontara Pappaseng As A Guideline And Philosophy Of Life Of Buginese Society In South Sulawesi Hindu Religious Ethics Values and Tolerance In Darmakaya's Gaguritan An Analysis of Differences in Online and Offline Learning at Mahardika Elementary School of Denpasar Humanist, Pluralist, and Dialogical Concepts in Hindu Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1