Is Paravertebral Block More Effective in Thoracotomy Patients Compared to Thoracic Epidural Block

M. Bakry, Hisham Mohamed Mohamed Salem
{"title":"Is Paravertebral Block More Effective in Thoracotomy Patients Compared to Thoracic Epidural Block","authors":"M. Bakry, Hisham Mohamed Mohamed Salem","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Paravertebral block (PVB) is a simple and safe technique that can be more efficacious than epidural block (EPB) in controlling postoperative pain. We aimed to confirm this by comparing the two methods in patients after thoracotomy. \nMethods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups, PVB or EPB (n=30 in each). Vital signs and the visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated before giving the block then 30 minutes and 3, 6, 9 and 12 hours after thoracotomy. Complications and need for additional analgesic agents were also scrutinized. \nResults: The most significant finding was better preservation of pulmonary function tests at most time points in the PVB group (<0.05). VAS scores trended to be better in the PVB group, but the difference was significant only at 30 minutes after giving the block. There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of complications or the need for additional analgesic agents. \nConclusion: Paravertebral and epidural blocks are effective in a similar degree in controlling post-operative pain but paravertebral block is safer and more tolerable for the patients.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"405 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Paravertebral block (PVB) is a simple and safe technique that can be more efficacious than epidural block (EPB) in controlling postoperative pain. We aimed to confirm this by comparing the two methods in patients after thoracotomy. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups, PVB or EPB (n=30 in each). Vital signs and the visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated before giving the block then 30 minutes and 3, 6, 9 and 12 hours after thoracotomy. Complications and need for additional analgesic agents were also scrutinized. Results: The most significant finding was better preservation of pulmonary function tests at most time points in the PVB group (<0.05). VAS scores trended to be better in the PVB group, but the difference was significant only at 30 minutes after giving the block. There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of complications or the need for additional analgesic agents. Conclusion: Paravertebral and epidural blocks are effective in a similar degree in controlling post-operative pain but paravertebral block is safer and more tolerable for the patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎旁阻滞比胸段硬膜外阻滞更有效吗
目的:椎旁阻滞(PVB)是一种简单、安全的技术,在控制术后疼痛方面比硬膜外阻滞(EPB)更有效。我们的目的是通过比较开胸术后患者的两种方法来证实这一点。方法:患者随机分为PVB组和EPB组,各30例。分别于开胸前30分钟和开胸后3、6、9、12小时评估生命体征和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。并发症和需要额外的镇痛剂也进行了审查。结果:PVB组在大多数时间点肺功能检查结果保存较好(<0.05)。PVB组的VAS评分倾向于较好,但差异仅在给予阻滞后30分钟才显着。两组之间在并发症发生率或需要额外镇痛药方面没有显著差异。结论:椎旁阻滞和硬膜外阻滞对术后疼痛的控制效果相似,但椎旁阻滞对患者更安全、更耐受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Support of Acute Pain Therapy by Analgesia Nociception Index in Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial Neurogenic information in autoimmune diseases and chronic pain syndromes Predictive Validity of Lumbar X-ray Images and MRIs for Chronic Low Back Pain Subtypes Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Spontaneous Pain in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Dexketoprofen for Mild to Moderate Pain among Filipino Adults: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1