Erratum: Concepts of and Approaches toward a developmental prevention of radicalization

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/mks-2021-0149
A. Beelmann
{"title":"Erratum: Concepts of and Approaches toward a developmental prevention of radicalization","authors":"A. Beelmann","doi":"10.1515/mks-2021-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the introduction of this article we cited several slightly incorrect data and used some misleading formulations. Although these mistakes do not change our general statements, they nevertheless should be corrected (corrections are marked bold). Introduction Despite the urgency of the current Covid19 pandemic, radicalization and extremism continue to be pressing problems throughout the world. According to the Global Terrorism Index, about 16,000 people lost their lives in 2018 as a result of politically or religiously motivated terrorist attacks (Institute for Economics and Peace, 2019). Although these are mainly people from Afghanistan, Nigeria, Iraq, and Syria, problems of radicalization and extremism are still a realistic threat within European societies. For example, about 41,000 politically motivated offenses were registered in Germany in 2019 - an increase of about 14 percent compared to 2018 (BMI, 2020). Of these, about 31,500 offences and 2,800 violent crimes had an explicit extremist background. In addition, more than 30,000 people in each group of right-wing, left-wing, or religious extremists have been observed as suspected cases, and a substantial number of these express a readiness to use violence. These and other data underline the need for effective prevention measures as a prominent future challenge facing the world community. However, when designing and implementing programs, it will be important to do this against the background of scientific knowledge on how radicalization and extremism emerge. This article presents an overview of relevant issues and promising approaches with which to tackle growing radicalization in young people from a developmental science perspective. © 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":43577,"journal":{"name":"Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform","volume":"35 1","pages":"85 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the introduction of this article we cited several slightly incorrect data and used some misleading formulations. Although these mistakes do not change our general statements, they nevertheless should be corrected (corrections are marked bold). Introduction Despite the urgency of the current Covid19 pandemic, radicalization and extremism continue to be pressing problems throughout the world. According to the Global Terrorism Index, about 16,000 people lost their lives in 2018 as a result of politically or religiously motivated terrorist attacks (Institute for Economics and Peace, 2019). Although these are mainly people from Afghanistan, Nigeria, Iraq, and Syria, problems of radicalization and extremism are still a realistic threat within European societies. For example, about 41,000 politically motivated offenses were registered in Germany in 2019 - an increase of about 14 percent compared to 2018 (BMI, 2020). Of these, about 31,500 offences and 2,800 violent crimes had an explicit extremist background. In addition, more than 30,000 people in each group of right-wing, left-wing, or religious extremists have been observed as suspected cases, and a substantial number of these express a readiness to use violence. These and other data underline the need for effective prevention measures as a prominent future challenge facing the world community. However, when designing and implementing programs, it will be important to do this against the background of scientific knowledge on how radicalization and extremism emerge. This article presents an overview of relevant issues and promising approaches with which to tackle growing radicalization in young people from a developmental science perspective. © 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
勘误:发展预防激进化的概念和方法
在本文的介绍中,我们引用了几个稍微不正确的数据,并使用了一些误导性的公式。虽然这些错误不会改变我们的总体陈述,但它们还是应该被纠正(更正用粗体标出)。尽管当前的covid - 19大流行很紧迫,但激进化和极端主义仍然是世界各地的紧迫问题。根据全球恐怖主义指数,2018年约有1.6万人因政治或宗教动机的恐怖袭击而丧生。(经济与和平研究所,2019)尽管这些人主要来自阿富汗、尼日利亚、伊拉克和叙利亚,但激进化和极端主义问题仍然是欧洲社会面临的现实威胁。例如,2019年德国登记了约4.1万起出于政治动机的犯罪,比2018年增加了约14% (BMI, 2020年)。其中,约有3.15万起犯罪和2800起暴力犯罪具有明显的极端主义背景。此外,每组右翼、左翼或宗教极端分子中都有3万多人被视为疑似病例,其中相当一部分人表示随时准备使用暴力。这些和其他数据强调需要采取有效的预防措施,这是国际社会未来面临的一项突出挑战。然而,在设计和实施计划时,重要的是要在对激进主义和极端主义如何产生的科学知识的背景下进行。本文从发展科学的角度概述了解决年轻人日益激进化的相关问题和有希望的方法。©2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
58. Kolloquium der Südwestdeutschen und Schweizerischen Kriminologischen Institute und Lehrstühle – Tagungsbericht Sig Sauers Rüstungsexporte nach Kolumbien: eine Fallanalyse organisationaler Devianz Threats to Scientifically Based Standards in Sex Offense Proceedings: Progress and the Interests of Alleged Victims in Jeopardy Frontmatter Vorurteilskriminalität vor Gericht – die Berücksichtigung von rassistischen, fremdenfeindlichen, antisemitischen oder sonstigen menschenverachtenden Zielen und Beweggründen gem. § 46 Abs. 2 S. 2 StGB im Rahmen der Strafzumessung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1