Is spinopelvic sagittal alignment correlated with pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome? A cross-sectional study

A. Elmelhat, Ahmed SA Youssef, Rami L. Abbas, Ahmed S. Ali, Hamada Ahmed Hamad, Sara Magdy Ahmed, S. Zahran
{"title":"Is spinopelvic sagittal alignment correlated with pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome? A cross-sectional study","authors":"A. Elmelhat, Ahmed SA Youssef, Rami L. Abbas, Ahmed S. Ali, Hamada Ahmed Hamad, Sara Magdy Ahmed, S. Zahran","doi":"10.6018/sportk.537601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing interest concerning the understanding of measurements of spinal and leg alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). However, evaluating spinopelvic alignment in the sagittal plane with pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) in PFPS has not been adequately addressed. The aim of the study was to identify the correlation of spinopelvic parameters with pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle in women with PFPS. This was a cross–sectional study involving sixty female patients diagnosed with PEPS, with a mean age of 32±6.47. The measurements used in the study included: radiographic parameters (X-Ray), the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), the Arabic anterior knee pain scale (AAKP/Kujala) and the 2D-FPPA. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these parameters. The results of our study demonstrated a strong positive correlation of lumbar lordosis (LL) with pain level and FPPA (r=0.825, r=0.812, p=0.0001). Also, a strong positive correlation of sacral slope (SS) with pain level (r = 0.0.820) and FPPA (r= 0.783). Pelvic tilt (PT) showed a moderate correlation with pain level (r = 0.0.614) and FPPA (r= 0.605), while a weak negative correlation was found between LL, SS and PT and functional disability score (r=-0.397, r=-0.385 and, r=-0.215 p=0.002). It was concluded that LL, SS and PT were significantly related to the pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle in women with PFPS. These spinal alignments should be considered in clinical evaluation of knee-related disorders associated with PFPS.","PeriodicalId":44430,"journal":{"name":"Sport TK-Revista Euroamericana de Ciencias del Deporte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport TK-Revista Euroamericana de Ciencias del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.537601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing interest concerning the understanding of measurements of spinal and leg alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). However, evaluating spinopelvic alignment in the sagittal plane with pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) in PFPS has not been adequately addressed. The aim of the study was to identify the correlation of spinopelvic parameters with pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle in women with PFPS. This was a cross–sectional study involving sixty female patients diagnosed with PEPS, with a mean age of 32±6.47. The measurements used in the study included: radiographic parameters (X-Ray), the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), the Arabic anterior knee pain scale (AAKP/Kujala) and the 2D-FPPA. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these parameters. The results of our study demonstrated a strong positive correlation of lumbar lordosis (LL) with pain level and FPPA (r=0.825, r=0.812, p=0.0001). Also, a strong positive correlation of sacral slope (SS) with pain level (r = 0.0.820) and FPPA (r= 0.783). Pelvic tilt (PT) showed a moderate correlation with pain level (r = 0.0.614) and FPPA (r= 0.605), while a weak negative correlation was found between LL, SS and PT and functional disability score (r=-0.397, r=-0.385 and, r=-0.215 p=0.002). It was concluded that LL, SS and PT were significantly related to the pain level, functional disability and frontal plane projection angle in women with PFPS. These spinal alignments should be considered in clinical evaluation of knee-related disorders associated with PFPS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髌股痛综合征女性的脊柱-骨盆矢状面排列与疼痛程度、功能残疾和额平面投影角度相关吗?横断面研究
人们对髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)患者脊柱和腿部对齐测量的理解越来越感兴趣。然而,评估矢状面脊柱骨盆对齐与PFPS患者疼痛程度、功能残疾和额平面投影角(FPPA)的关系尚未得到充分解决。本研究的目的是确定脊柱骨盆参数与PFPS女性疼痛程度、功能障碍和额平面投影角度的相关性。这是一项横断面研究,涉及60名确诊为PEPS的女性患者,平均年龄为32±6.47岁。研究中使用的测量方法包括:x射线参数(x射线)、数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)、阿拉伯膝关节前痛量表(AAKP/Kujala)和2D-FPPA。采用Spearman相关分析评价这些参数之间的关系。我们的研究结果显示腰椎前凸(LL)与疼痛程度和FPPA有很强的正相关(r=0.825, r=0.812, p=0.0001)。骶骨斜率(SS)与疼痛程度(r= 0.820)和FPPA (r= 0.783)呈正相关。骨盆倾斜(PT)与疼痛程度(r= 0.0.614)、FPPA (r= 0.605)呈中度相关,而LL、SS、PT与功能失能评分呈弱负相关(r=-0.397、r=-0.385、r=-0.215 p=0.002)。结果表明,LL、SS和PT与PFPS患者疼痛程度、功能障碍和额平面投影角度有显著相关。在临床评估与PFPS相关的膝关节相关疾病时,应考虑这些脊柱对准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Publication trends on sports sociology: Global perspectives and emerging themes The effect of a life skill-based learning model on improving students' basic ability to survive in water for 60 minutes through swimming Talent identification among elite Czech male junior tennis players (U12) according to their future tennis performance and birthdate Impact of Covid-19 outbreak on stress and depression among Indian football players Antropometría y habilidades acuáticas de los niños que asisten a la natación
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1