Indications and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section at St Paul's Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017: (Afoul Month Retrospective Cohort Study)

Bizuneh Ayano, Ayana Guto
{"title":"Indications and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section at St Paul's Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017: (Afoul Month Retrospective Cohort Study)","authors":"Bizuneh Ayano, Ayana Guto","doi":"10.33425/2639-9342.1053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cesarean section (CS) rates and their indications vary all over the World. Audit of indications and factors affecting infant and maternal outcome remain an important activity in rationalizing the use of this major procedure in obstetrics practice. Cesarean section (CS) carries a higher maternal morbidity and mortality compared to vaginal delivery. No researches have been done on this area. Objective: To determine the leading indications for ECS and their associated maternal and neonatal outcomes in St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC). Methodology: Retrospective facility-based study was used and data was collected by reviewing the log book of patients who underwent CS operations at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) gynecology obstetric department from 1st February to 30th May 2017. The leading indications for Emergency Cesarean Section (ECS) were determined in terms of frequency and percentage. Clinical outcomes of the mothers and the delivered newborns were gauged by morbidity, mortality and survival rates (i.e. within the hospital confinement). Results: A total of 2345, deliveries were conducted, of which 582 deliveries were by cesarean section procedures making the institutional cesarean section rate of 24.8%. Records of patients who underwent Emergency Cesarean section (ECS) were retrieved and comprised the study population (N=522). Perinatal Asphyxia (PNA) was the most common cause of the neonatal death 6 (42.9%). Dystocia (26.4%) emerged as the leading indication for ECS followed by Non reassurance fetal heart rate pattern (NRFHRP) (18.8%). an association between indications of EC/S, Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR) scores at 5th minute and fetal outcome with p value of <0.05 was observed. Conclusions: The institutional cesarean section rate is 25%, Maternal outcome was favorable with 94.8% of smooth post operation course and Surgical site wound infection was 63.0% among post operation complications that mothers developed. Dystocia (26.4%) emerged for ECS followed by Non reassurance fetal heart rate pattern (NRFHRP) (18.8%), Meconium stained Amniotic fluid (10.7%) and failed induction (5.4%). Neonatal outcome with survival rate of 94.1%. There was an association between indications of Emergency Cesarean Section (ECS), Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR) scores at 5th minute and fetal outcome with p value of <0.05. [Ayano B, Guto A. Assessment of indications for emergency cesarean section and its outcomes at St. Paul’s Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017: (afour month retrospective cohort study)].","PeriodicalId":12828,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology & reproductive health","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology & reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9342.1053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section (CS) rates and their indications vary all over the World. Audit of indications and factors affecting infant and maternal outcome remain an important activity in rationalizing the use of this major procedure in obstetrics practice. Cesarean section (CS) carries a higher maternal morbidity and mortality compared to vaginal delivery. No researches have been done on this area. Objective: To determine the leading indications for ECS and their associated maternal and neonatal outcomes in St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC). Methodology: Retrospective facility-based study was used and data was collected by reviewing the log book of patients who underwent CS operations at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) gynecology obstetric department from 1st February to 30th May 2017. The leading indications for Emergency Cesarean Section (ECS) were determined in terms of frequency and percentage. Clinical outcomes of the mothers and the delivered newborns were gauged by morbidity, mortality and survival rates (i.e. within the hospital confinement). Results: A total of 2345, deliveries were conducted, of which 582 deliveries were by cesarean section procedures making the institutional cesarean section rate of 24.8%. Records of patients who underwent Emergency Cesarean section (ECS) were retrieved and comprised the study population (N=522). Perinatal Asphyxia (PNA) was the most common cause of the neonatal death 6 (42.9%). Dystocia (26.4%) emerged as the leading indication for ECS followed by Non reassurance fetal heart rate pattern (NRFHRP) (18.8%). an association between indications of EC/S, Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR) scores at 5th minute and fetal outcome with p value of <0.05 was observed. Conclusions: The institutional cesarean section rate is 25%, Maternal outcome was favorable with 94.8% of smooth post operation course and Surgical site wound infection was 63.0% among post operation complications that mothers developed. Dystocia (26.4%) emerged for ECS followed by Non reassurance fetal heart rate pattern (NRFHRP) (18.8%), Meconium stained Amniotic fluid (10.7%) and failed induction (5.4%). Neonatal outcome with survival rate of 94.1%. There was an association between indications of Emergency Cesarean Section (ECS), Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR) scores at 5th minute and fetal outcome with p value of <0.05. [Ayano B, Guto A. Assessment of indications for emergency cesarean section and its outcomes at St. Paul’s Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017: (afour month retrospective cohort study)].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017年埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴圣保罗医院医学院急诊剖宫产的适应证和结果:(4个月回顾性队列研究)
背景:世界各地剖宫产率及其适应症各不相同。对影响母婴结局的指征和因素的审计仍然是在产科实践中合理化使用这一主要程序的重要活动。与阴道分娩相比,剖宫产的产妇发病率和死亡率更高。这方面还没有研究。目的:确定圣保罗医院千禧医学院(SPHMMC) ECS的主要适应症及其相关的孕产妇和新生儿结局。方法:采用基于医院的回顾性研究,并通过回顾2017年2月1日至5月30日在圣保罗医院千禧医学院(SPHMMC)妇科产科接受CS手术的患者日志收集数据。急诊剖宫产(ECS)的主要指征是根据频率和百分比确定的。通过发病率、死亡率和生存率(即住院期间)衡量母亲和分娩新生儿的临床结果。结果:共分娩2345例,其中剖宫产582例,机构剖宫产率为24.8%。检索急诊剖宫产(ECS)患者的记录,纳入研究人群(N=522)。围产期窒息(PNA)是新生儿死亡的最常见原因6(42.9%)。难产(26.4%)是ECS的主要指征,其次是非安心胎心率模式(NRFHRP)(18.8%)。5分钟时EC/S、外貌、脉搏、鬼脸、活动、呼吸(APGAR)评分与胎儿结局存在相关性,p值<0.05。结论:医院剖宫产率为25%,产妇结局良好,术后病程顺利率为94.8%,产妇术后并发症手术部位伤口感染率为63.0%。ECS出现难产(26.4%),其次是无保证胎心率(NRFHRP)(18.8%)、胎粪染色羊水(10.7%)和诱导失败(5.4%)。新生儿结局生存率94.1%。急诊剖宫产(ECS)指征、第5分钟外貌、脉搏、鬼脸、活动、呼吸(APGAR)评分与胎儿结局有相关性,p值<0.05。[Ayano B, Guto A.急诊剖宫产指征评估及其预后[j].埃塞俄比亚,亚的斯亚贝巴,2017(4个月回顾性队列研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mosaic 47,XYY/45,X Presenting With Male Infertility: A Rare Case Report Influence of Placental Metalloproteinase-9 Protein on the Branching Architecture of Chorionic Blood Vessels of Human Placenta Uterine Leiomyoma in Postmenopausal Women: Possible Reasons for Growth and Differential Diagnosis Choledocholithiasis Masquerading as Preeclampsia with Severe Features in a Patient with a History of a Cholecystectomy Case Report The Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Benign Ovarian Cyst and Histological Pattern in a Tertiary Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1