Measuring social justice in the light of effectiveness of public distributive policy

Q1 Social Sciences Administratie si Management Public Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.24818/AMP/2019.32-05
H. Mishchuk, N. Samoliuk, Y. Bilan
{"title":"Measuring social justice in the light of effectiveness of public distributive policy","authors":"H. Mishchuk, N. Samoliuk, Y. Bilan","doi":"10.24818/AMP/2019.32-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Our paper stems from the basis of the fundamental principles of equity theory and other justice theories. It suggests integral index of social justice that includes two partial indices: observance of fundamental rights and distribution of socio-economic achievements. Design/methodology/approach – We employ the index method based on normalization of partial indices according to their impact on overall social justice. For computing the integral index of social justice (ISJ) we select countries with obvious links between economic outcomes and efficiency of social sphere regulation (16 EU Member States). We use the data from Global Competitiveness Report which are the most appropriate to components of partial indices. Findings – We assessed the level of social justice basing on the case study of the EU Member States which demonstrate the most obvious relationship of economic efficiency and quality of social sphere regulation. The research confirmed that the economic leadership of the countries has a close connection with social justice in the respective society. At the same time, targeting and ensuring the effectiveness of the state distribution policy in terms of availability of socio-economic benefits beyond the minimum social guarantees is still inferior to efforts aimed at creating an infrastructure for social support of the population and guarantees of fundamental rights and freedoms. Originality/value – We suggest a unique method that allows to identify the reserves of the state distributive mechanisms' improvement and to analyse the links of social justice of the living environment and doing business with the economic successes of the states. Our approach to determining the weighting factors and the composition of the indicators according to the social justice categories can be specified depending on the research objectives.","PeriodicalId":38266,"journal":{"name":"Administratie si Management Public","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administratie si Management Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/AMP/2019.32-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Purpose Our paper stems from the basis of the fundamental principles of equity theory and other justice theories. It suggests integral index of social justice that includes two partial indices: observance of fundamental rights and distribution of socio-economic achievements. Design/methodology/approach – We employ the index method based on normalization of partial indices according to their impact on overall social justice. For computing the integral index of social justice (ISJ) we select countries with obvious links between economic outcomes and efficiency of social sphere regulation (16 EU Member States). We use the data from Global Competitiveness Report which are the most appropriate to components of partial indices. Findings – We assessed the level of social justice basing on the case study of the EU Member States which demonstrate the most obvious relationship of economic efficiency and quality of social sphere regulation. The research confirmed that the economic leadership of the countries has a close connection with social justice in the respective society. At the same time, targeting and ensuring the effectiveness of the state distribution policy in terms of availability of socio-economic benefits beyond the minimum social guarantees is still inferior to efforts aimed at creating an infrastructure for social support of the population and guarantees of fundamental rights and freedoms. Originality/value – We suggest a unique method that allows to identify the reserves of the state distributive mechanisms' improvement and to analyse the links of social justice of the living environment and doing business with the economic successes of the states. Our approach to determining the weighting factors and the composition of the indicators according to the social justice categories can be specified depending on the research objectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从公共分配政策的有效性来衡量社会公正
本文从公平理论和其他正义理论的基本原理出发。它提出了社会正义的整体指数,其中包括两个部分指数:遵守基本权利和分配社会经济成就。设计/方法/方法-我们根据部分指数对整体社会公正的影响,采用基于标准化的指数方法。为了计算社会公正的综合指数(ISJ),我们选择了经济成果与社会领域监管效率之间存在明显联系的国家(16个欧盟成员国)。我们使用的数据来自全球竞争力报告,这是最适合部分指数的组成部分。调查结果-我们根据欧盟成员国的案例研究评估了社会公正水平,这些国家证明了经济效率和社会领域监管质量之间最明显的关系。研究证实,各国的经济领导地位与各自社会的社会公正有着密切的联系。与此同时,在提供最低社会保障以外的社会经济利益方面,确定国家分配政策的目标并确保其有效性,仍然不如旨在为人口的社会支助和保障基本权利和自由建立基础设施的努力。原创性/价值-我们提出了一种独特的方法,可以识别国家分配机制改进的储备,并分析生活环境的社会正义和与国家经济成功开展业务的联系。我们根据社会正义类别确定权重因子和指标组成的方法可以根据研究目标具体规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Administratie si Management Public
Administratie si Management Public Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Is an international academic journal, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Faculty of Administration and Public Management and the International Centre for Public Management. Is an open access journal published in English, twice a year. Is double peer-reviewed. Includes articles prepared by scholars, researchers and practitioners. Is addressed to the teachers, researchers, Ph. D students, master students, undergraduate students, public managers, civil servants and to other categories of readers. The papers published in this journal: - Contain the research results of some researches and surveys developed by the authors. - Include new theoretical/practical and original approaches that were presented and analysed by the authors. - Offer solutions for the public managers problems. - Stimulate the know-how transfer from an institution to another, from a country to another in the areas of administration and public management. The paper proposed for evaluation can be sent throughout the year, preferably by the end of April or before the end of October. Main areas covered by the journal articles are: public management; public administration; public policy; public services; social economy; social environment; management of the nongovernmental organizations; human resources management in the public sector; decision making in public organizations; governance; communication in public sector; sociology; demografy; migration; globalization; other related domains.
期刊最新文献
Government assistance programs for internally displaced persons: assessing the impact on economic growth and labour market Greening public organisations: is there room for pro-environmental public servants to participate? Decision support in the budget management of a public institution: a constructivist multicriteria model Differences of motivation profile of public sector employees in Israel depending on age and job seniority New Public Management rhetoric in developing country: will agencification and management control lead to organisational culture transformation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1