EVOLUTION OF COHESION POLICY. MISSION AND GOVERNANCE

IF 1.2 4区 法学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.34135/sjpppa.210807
Igor Jašurek
{"title":"EVOLUTION OF COHESION POLICY. MISSION AND GOVERNANCE","authors":"Igor Jašurek","doi":"10.34135/sjpppa.210807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cohesion policy is the major investment vehicle and the most reforming EU budgetary chapter. Its landmark reforms mark key integration processes in the European Union. The present policy paper provides reflections of the dynamics of the main development trends in cohesion policy as determined by global phenomena, namely the economic and financial crisis and the current COVID-19 pandemic. They severely hit the entire EU, inevitably also affecting cohesion policy. The article shows that governance and the mission of cohesion policy has been adjusted to their aftermaths. Reforms introduced new measures and reinforced policy’s centralized European profile. Thus, evolution of cohesion policy is an illustration of its transformation from the merely redistributive tool with limited budgetary resources into the full-fledged development policy aimed at safeguarding that EU’s visions and goals will be pursued. The paper concludes that a new architecture poses the major challenge for cohesion policy after 2020 as its responsibilities and ever tightening governance continues while its budgets shrinks.","PeriodicalId":34601,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34135/sjpppa.210807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cohesion policy is the major investment vehicle and the most reforming EU budgetary chapter. Its landmark reforms mark key integration processes in the European Union. The present policy paper provides reflections of the dynamics of the main development trends in cohesion policy as determined by global phenomena, namely the economic and financial crisis and the current COVID-19 pandemic. They severely hit the entire EU, inevitably also affecting cohesion policy. The article shows that governance and the mission of cohesion policy has been adjusted to their aftermaths. Reforms introduced new measures and reinforced policy’s centralized European profile. Thus, evolution of cohesion policy is an illustration of its transformation from the merely redistributive tool with limited budgetary resources into the full-fledged development policy aimed at safeguarding that EU’s visions and goals will be pursued. The paper concludes that a new architecture poses the major challenge for cohesion policy after 2020 as its responsibilities and ever tightening governance continues while its budgets shrinks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凝聚力政策的演变。使命及管治
凝聚力政策是主要的投资工具,也是最具改革意义的欧盟预算章节。其里程碑式的改革标志着欧盟关键的一体化进程。本政策文件反映了全球现象(即经济和金融危机以及当前的COVID-19大流行)所决定的凝聚力政策主要发展趋势的动态。它们严重打击了整个欧盟,也不可避免地影响到凝聚力政策。本文表明,治理和凝聚力政策的使命已经根据其后果进行了调整。改革引入了新的措施,加强了政策的欧洲中央形象。因此,凝聚力政策的演变是其从预算资源有限的再分配工具转变为旨在保障欧盟愿景和目标将被追求的成熟发展政策的一个例证。该报告的结论是,2020年后的新架构对凝聚力政策构成了重大挑战,因为其责任和日益严格的治理将继续,而其预算将萎缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A stakeholder analysis for sustainable development of Maritime Village in Semarang coastal community, Indonesia Indigenous cultures and employee efficiency: the moderating effect of cronyism in state-owned enterprises in Ghana Agencification, policy reversal and the reforms of the French health care system Critical success factors of Public-Private Partnerships in the education sector Citizens’ trust and digital attitudes: evidence from city digital transformation in Shanghai, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1